Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CHENEY: CLEAR LINKS BETWEEN SADDAM, AL-QAEDA; CALLS NY TIMES ARTICLE 'OUTRAGEOUS'
Drudge Report ^ | June 17, 2004

Posted on 06/17/2004 5:02:46 PM PDT by RWR8189

In an EXCLUSIVE interview with CNBCÕs 'Capital Report':

Vice President Dick Cheney said that there were clearly ties between Saddam Hussein and the al-Qaeda terrorists, and he called the New York Times coverage of the story "outrageous."

The vice president was responding to a report from the 9-11 Commission saying it had found no evidence of "collaboration" between Iraq and Al Qaeda.

ALAN MURRAY, co-host:

Hello and welcome to CAPITAL REPORT. I'm Alan Murray. Our top story tonight, the 9-11 Commission ended its hearings today with some surprising news. Among other things, the panel says it's found no evidence that Saddam Hussein collaborated with al-Qaida terrorists, seeming to contradict the White House, which has emphasized links between the two. In a CNBC exclusive tonight, we get Vice President Dick Cheney's first reaction to today's news.

My partner, Gloria Borger, is with the vice president in the battleground state of Ohio, where he campaigned in Lewis City, just outside of Columbus, today. Gloria.

GLORIA BORGER, co-host:

That's right, Alan. We are at NexTech Materials, which is a high-tech manufacturer in Lewis Center, Ohio. Of course, as you know, the vice president just gave a speech here this afternoon. John Kerry has also been here this week and, as you mentioned, Ohio is, of course, a battleground state.

Thank you so much for being with us, Mr. Vice President. And we will get to talk about the economy in a few minutes.

Vice President DICK CHENEY: OK.

BORGER: But obviously first the news of the week is the 9-11 Commission report. And as you know, the report found, quote, "No credible evidence that al-Qaida collaborated with Iraq or Saddam Hussein. Do you disagree with its findings?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: I disagree with the way their findings have been portrayed. This has been enormous confusion over the Iraq-al-Qaida connection, Gloria. First of all, on the question of whether or not there was any kind of a relationship, there clearly was a relationship. It's been testified to. The evidence is overwhelming. It goes back to the early '90s.

It involves a whole series of contacts, high-level contacts between Osama bin Laden and Iraqi intelligence officials. It involves a senior official, a brigadier general in the Iraqi intelligence service going to the Sudan before bin Laden ever went to Afghanistan to train them in bomb-making, helping teach them how to forge documents. Mr. Zarqawi, who's in Baghdad today, is an al-Qaida associate who took refuge in Baghdad, found sanctuary and safe harbor there before we ever launched into Iraq. There's a Mr. Yasin, who was a World Trade Center bomber in '93, who fled to Iraq after that and we found since when we got into Baghdad, documents showing that he was put on the payroll and given housing by Saddam Hussein after the '93 attack; in other words, provided safe harbor and sanctuary. There's clearly been a relationship.

There's a separate question. The separate question is: Was Iraq involved with al-Qaida in the attack on 9/11?

BORGER: Was Iraq involved?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: We don't know. You know, what the commission says is that they can't find any evidence of that. We had one report which is a famous report on the Czech intelligence service and we've never been able to confirm or to knock it down.

BORGER: Well, let me just get to the bottom line here...

Vice Pres. CHENEY: But it's very important that people understand these two differences. What The New York Times did today was outrageous. They do a lot of outrageous things but the headline, Panel Find Qaida-Iraq Tie. The press wants to run out and say there's a fundamental split here now between what the president said and what the commission said. Jim Thompson is a member of the commission who's since been on the air. I saw him with my own eyes. And there's no conflict. What they were addressing was whether or not they were involved in 9/11. And there they found no evidence to support that proposition. They did not address the broader question of a relationship between Iraq and al-Qaida in other areas, in other ways.

BORGER: Well, my reading of the report is that it says that, yes, contacts were made between al-Qaida and Iraq, but they could find no evidence that any relationship, in fact, had been forged between al-Qaida and Iraq.

Vice Pres. CHENEY: And you're talking generally now, not just 9/11.

BORGER: Not just 9/11. And let's talk generally and then we'll get to 9/11.

Vice Pres. CHENEY: Talk generally.

BORGER: Generally.

Vice Pres. CHENEY: That's not true.

BORGER: So you disagree?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: Absolutely. Look at the Zarqawi case. Here's a man who's Jordanian by birth. He's described as an al-Qaida associate. He ran training camps in Afghanistan back before we went to war in Afghanistan. After we went in and hit his training camp, he fled to Baghdad. Found safe harbor and sanctuary in Baghdad in May of 2002. He arrived with about two dozen other supporters of his, members of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, which was Zawahiri's organization. He's the number two to bin Laden, which was merged with al-Qaida interchangeably. Egyptian Islamic Jihad, al-Qaida, same-same. They're all now part of one organization. They merged some years ago. So Zarqawi living in Baghdad. We arranged for information to be passed on his presence in Baghdad to the Iraqis through a third-party intelligence service. They did that twice. There's no question but what Saddam Hussein really was there. He was allowed to operate out of Baghdad. He ran the poisons fact ory in northern Iraq out of Baghdad, which became a safe harbor for Ansar al-Islam??? as well as al-Qaida fleeing Afghanistan. There clearly was a relationship there that stretched back over that period of time to at least May of '02, a year before we launched into Iraq. He is the worst offender. He's probably killed more Iraqis than any other man in Iraq today. He is probably the leading terrorist still operating in Iraq today.

BORGER: Now some say that he corresponded with al-Qaida only after Saddam was deposed.

Vice Pres. CHENEY: That's not true. He had been involved working side by side, as described by the CIA, with al-Qaida over the years. This is an old established relationship. He's the man who killed our man Foley in Jordan, an AID official, during this period of time. To suggest that there's no connection between Zarqawi, no relationship if you will, and Iraq just simply is not true.

BORGER: Well, let's get to Mohammad Atta for a minute, because you mentioned him as well. You have said in the past that it was, quote, "pretty well confirmed."

Vice Pres. CHENEY: No, I never said that.

BORGER: OK.

Vice Pres. CHENEY: Never said that.

BORGER: I think that is...

Vice Pres. CHENEY: Absolutely not. What I said was the Czech intelligence service reported after 9/11 that Atta had been in Prague on April 9th of 2001, where he allegedly met with an Iraqi intelligence official. We have never been able to confirm that nor have we been able to knock it down.

BORGER: Well, now this report says it didn't happen.

Vice Pres. CHENEY: No. This report says they haven't found any evidence.

BORGER: That it happened.

Vice Pres. CHENEY: Right.

BORGER: But you haven't found the evidence that it happened either, have you?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: No. All we have is that one report from the Czechs. We just don't know.

BORGER: So does this put it to rest for you or not on Atta?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: It doesn't add anything from my perspective. I mean, I still am a skeptic. I can't refute the Czech plan. I can't prove the Czech plan. It's ...(unintelligible) the nature of the intelligence (unintelligible).

BORGER: OK, but let's...

Vice Pres. CHENEY: But that is a separate question from what the press has gotten all in a dither about, The New York Times especially, on this other question. What they've done is, I think, distorted what the commission actually reported, certainly according to Governor Thompson, who's a member of the commission.

BORGER: But you say you disagree with the commission...

Vice Pres. CHENEY: On this question of whether or not there was a general relationship.

BORGER: Yes.

Vice Pres. CHENEY: Yeah.

BORGER: And they say that there was not one forged and you were saying yes, that there was. Do you know things that the commission does not know?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: Probably.

BORGER: And do you think the commission needs to know them?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: I don't have any--I don't know what they know. I do know they didn't talk with any original sources on this subject that say that in their report.

BORGER: They did talk with people who had interrogated sources.

Vice Pres. CHENEY: Right.

BORGER: So they do have good sources.

Vice Pres. CHENEY: Gloria, the notion that there is no relationship between Iraq and al-Qaida just simply is not true. I'm going to read this material here. Your show isn't long enough for me to read all the pieces...

BORGER: Sure it is.

Vice Pres. CHENEY: ...but in the fall of '95 and again in the summer of '96, bin Laden met with Iraqi intelligence service representatives at his farm in Sudan. Bin Laden asked for terror training from Iraq. The Iraqi intelligence service responded. It deployed a bomb-making expert, a brigadier general in the Iraqi intelligence.

BORGER: OK, but now just let me stop you there, because what this report says is that he was not given the support that he had asked for from Iraq, that he had requested all of these things but, in fact, did not get them.

Vice Pres. CHENEY: He got this. We know for a fact. This is from George Tenet's testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee February 12th, 2003, etc. I mean, it's there. It's ...(unintelligible).

BORGER: So is the commission credible as far as you're concerned?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: I haven't read their entire report on everything. I think they're doing good work. I think it's a very tough job they've been doing and I don't mean to be overly critical of them. I think this is not an area they looked at. According to Governor Thompson again, they didn't spend a lot of time on the question of Iraq and al-Qaida except for the 9/11 proposition.

That's what they're asked to look at. They did not spend a lot of time on these other issues. They've got one paragraph in the report that talks about that. And so the notion that you can take one paragraph from the 9-11 Commission and say, `Ah, therefore that says there was never a connection between Iraq and al-Qaida.' It's just wrong. It's not true. I'd love to go on on all of this stuff, but the fact of the matter is there clearly was a relationship there. Now...

BORGER: Let me just ask you, bottom line, though, on 9/11...

Vice Pres. CHENEY: On 9/11...

BORGER: ...Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: We have never been able to prove that there was a connection there on 9/11. The one thing we have is the Czech intelligence service report saying that Mohammad Atta had met with the senior Iraqi intelligence official at the embassy on April 9th, 2001. That's never been proven. It's never been refuted.

BORGER: OK. And let me ask you one more personal note. The commission also reported today that you gave the order to shoot down those airplanes that were commandeered by the terrorists but that your orders never reached the American pilots. Can you tell us how agonizing that was?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: Well, actually it went very fast. First of all, I discussed it with the president. The president made the decision. Then I was asked sometime after that--an officer came into the emergency operations center into the White House where I was located and wanted to know if they were authorized to shoot down the aircraft. And based on my earlier discussion with the president I said yes. I didn't spend a lot of time thinking about it. They needed a fast decision. There was a report of an airplane 80 miles out headed towards the White House and towards Washington.

So it was a quick decision. It had to be quick. Planes were flying 500 miles an hour at buildings. It turned out--we didn't know this at the timeÑit turned out that by the time the order was given, the plane that was headed that way--United 93--had crashed. The passengers had obviously...

BORGER: Had your order gotten to the planes?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: No.

BORGER: Would that happen another time? I mean, is that fixed?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: Well, is it fixed? I think it is now, but at the time, nobody had ever trained for or planned on having American fighters shoot down American commercial airliners. That's not a drill that, you know, anybody's ever practiced before and it's not clear that day that if the pilot had received that order that he would have quickly and instantly followed it. It would have been a hard thing to do to fall in on a United Airlines flight and shoot it out of the sky if you're up there with--an American flying an F-15.

So again, what we know now based on the timelines and so forth that were established is that by the time that order was transmitted, United 93 had already gone down because of the action of the passengers.

BORGER: Let me ask you what your response is to the Democratic presidential candidate, John Kerry, who said upon looking at this 9/11 report that this administration, quote, "misled America."

Vice Pres. CHENEY: In what respect? I haven't seen that.

BORGER: In terms of the relationship between al-Qaida and Iraq.

Vice Pres. CHENEY: We never said that Iraq was responsible for 9/11. We never said that. You can't find any place where I said it, where the president said it. I was asked that, as a matter of fact, by Tim Russert on "Meet the Press" on the Sunday after the attack and said, `No, we don't have any evidence of it.' Later on we received this information from the Czechs, but again, as I say, we've never been able to prove that nor have we been able to knock it down.

BORGER: Now the report says, though, that there isn't any relationship, so...

Vice Pres. CHENEY: They've concluded, based on what they've done.

BORGER: And you're not there.

Vice Pres. CHENEY: They've concluded and I haven't had a chance to read all of their report. They've concluded based on the work they've done that there was no connection, that Iraq was not responsible for 9/11. And I can't say they were. I've never seen evidence that supports that, except this one report from the Czechs.

BORGER: Are we close to getting Osama bin Laden?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: I think we will get Osama bin Laden. I wouldn't want to put a time frame on it. We're actively in the hunt. We have been now for some considerable period of time and I think eventually we'll run him to ground.

BORGER: Now recently the Saudis have also been victims of al-Qaida. There was an attack that killed 22 people. Now an American is being held hostage there. The family of this hostage, Paul Johnson Jr., has asked for the release of al-Qaida detainees so he can be released. What's your response to their request?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: Well, we're working closely with the Saudis on this matter. We're--our officials have been in touch with the Johnson family, as it should be. We do not, as a general proposition, believe it makes any sense to negotiate with hostage takers. All you do when you do that is put a price on the head of every other American out there. If, in fact, the terrorists can come capture an American and trade him for 12 of their own who are in custody for their past murderous acts, then you will almost guarantee there will be further kidnappings. So as a general proposition, the policy of this administration and our predecessors has always been you don't negotiate with terrorists.

BORGER: In hindsight, Mr. Vice President, are you disappointed in the quality of the intelligence that you received before launching an attack against Iraq?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: I can't say that, Gloria. I think the decision we made was exactly the right one. Everything I know today, everything the president knows today, we would have done exactly the same thing. Saddam Hussein was an evil man. He'd launched two wars. He'd produced and used weapons of mass destruction in the past. He had provided safe harbor and sanctuary for terrorists. He was paying $25,000 a pop to the families of suicide bombers who'd kill Israelis. He hosted Abu Nidal in Baghdad, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, had established a relationship with al-Qaida. This was an evil man who had tried previously to expand his influence in the area and we did exactly the right thing.

Now could we have better intelligence? You always want better intelligence. If you had complete knowledge on these kinds of decisions and issues, you wouldn't need a president to make the decision; some robot could. The President has to make judgments. You go to the president of the United States and you lay down a very strong case that this guy is all the things I've said plus had reconstituted his weapons of mass destruction program, tell him it's a slam dunk case and you've got the ongoing evidence of a relationship with al-Qaida and we had 9/11. 9/11 changed a lot. Remember what happened after 9/11. We said henceforth we will no longer make a distinction between the terrorists and states that sponsor or have safe harbor sanctuary for terrorists. If you're going to host a terrorist, you're going to be held responsible for their actions just as much as the terrorists are, which is what we did in Afghanistan. And it's very important for us to remember that when 9/11 occurred, it forced us to look at the world a new way, that part of the world in particular, where in fact Saddam Hussein operated.

BORGER: Mr. Vice President, I don't think I've ever seen you, in all the years I've interviewed you, as exercised about something as you seem today.

Vice Pres. CHENEY: I was. I admit, Gloria, and you and I have known each other a long time. But I do believe that the press has been irresponsible, that there's this temptation to take...

BORGER: But the press is making a distinction between 9/11 and...

Vice Pres. CHENEY: No, they're not. They're not. The New York Times does not. The Panel Finds No Qaida-Iraq Ties. That's what it says. That's the vaunted New York Times. Numerous--I've watched a lot of the coverage on it and the fact of the matter is they don't make a distinction. They fuzz it up. Sometimes it's through ignorance. Sometimes it's malicious. But you'll take a statement that's geared specifically to say there's no connection in relation to the 9/11 attack and then say, `Well, obviously there's no case here.' And then jump over to challenge the president's credibility or my credibility and say ...(unintelligible).

BORGER: Do you feel it's your personal credibility on the line, because obviously you have been portrayed as...

Vice Pres. CHENEY: No, I'm grateful. I...

BORGER: ...the hard-liner in the administration...

Vice Pres. CHENEY: No.

BORGER: ...somebody who's...

Vice Pres. CHENEY: Gloria, I don't feel persecuted. I don't need to. The fact of the matter is, the evidence is overwhelming. The press is, with all due respect, and there are exceptions, oftentimes lazy, oftentimes simply reports what somebody else in the press said without doing their homework.

BORGER: But it's the commission that reached--I mean, I know. I don't want to go back over the old ground here, but...

Vice Pres. CHENEY: No, but you need to go back and look...

BORGER: OK.

Vice Pres. CHENEY: ...at what Governor Jim Thompson said today about his conclusion as a commissioner based on the work that's been done; that they focused on 9/11. Their conclusion based on what they've seen on 9/11 is there was no Iraqi involvement, but he said, we did not address the rest of it. That was not our mission. That wasn't our assignment, to look at the broader relationship between Iraq and al-Qaida.

BORGER: OK, Mr. Vice President, we are here in Ohio and I promised you that I would talk about the economy, so I will do that.

Vice Pres. CHENEY: It's very important.

BORGER: It is an important subject. State by state job numbers are coming out tomorrow. You're here in a must-win state for either party. Your administration says that 1.2 million jobs have been created this year. John Kerry says 1.2 million fewer people are employed since you took office. So what do you say to that and what do you say to the 200,000 or so people in Ohio who are still out of work?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: Well, the unemployment rate in Ohio has dropped from 6.2 percent to 5.8 percent. The Ohio economy is improving significantly just like the economy across the rest of the country. I said the economy is growing by 5 percent over the past year. That's the fastest rate of growth since the first Reagan term, nearly 20 years ago. I look at real personal disposable income and it's up 3.3 percent in the last year. In the last year of the Clinton administration it was only 1.4 percent, so it's almost three times as fast. If you look at inflation, if you look at interest rates, if you look at productivity, if you look at housing starts, if you look at manufacturing, everything's moving in the right direction. This is a very strong economy. It's getting stronger. I've heard John Kerry say this is the worst economy since the Great Depression. That's just wrong. And anybody who hears that says, `What the hell's he talking about?' He doesn't know what he's talking about obviously. And I think this notion that we're trying here to look at exactly the same situation and that you can't conclude this is a strong, healthy economy--you clearly can and I think he's clearly not credible when he tries to make the case that the economy's terrible.

BORGER: Well, he talked about--he's been talking about a middle-class squeeze this week, even in this state, saying job loss is rising, health-care costs, huge budget deficits that are going to result in cuts in social programs.

Vice Pres. CHENEY: If John Kerry had had his way, there would be no economic recovery today because he voted against the Bush tax cuts. He would not support the very policies we put in place, cutting tax rates, getting rid of the child tax credit, increasing their credit and reducing the marriage penalty, providing greater expensing for companies like this one right here, NexTech, and allow them to invest and go out and buy new equipment and hire more people. All of those policies flow directly out of the tax policies that we put in place in 2001, 2002 and 2003. John Kerry opposed it.

BORGER: Well, do we need more tax cuts now?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: There would be no economic recovery today if John Kerry had had his way. His problem is he's got to try and find some way to create a sense of disappointment and pessimism about the economy and that's exactly what he's doing.

BORGER: Do we need more tax cuts?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: We need to make the ones we've got permanent. That's the most important thing, because the way the Senate rules work, the ones that we put in place will expire over the next few years unless we make them permanent. And when those cuts expire, that'll result in a tax increase on the American people and that's exactly the wrong medicine.

BORGER: And, Mr. Vice President, what do you say to people who argue that the gap between the wealthy and the poor has grown?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: I look at numbers that point out the extent to which we have reduced the taxes on everybody in America who pays income taxes. That the average reduction for a family in the US has been $1,500 from those cuts and, as I say, things like real disposable personal income, which is probably the best measure of all of what people have in their pockets. It's the after tax income and it includes benefits they receive on the job. And that is growing by leaps and bounds because of the policies we put in place.

BORGER: Now just to go to a few more subjects sort of potpourri very quickly, there is obviously as you know an ongoing investigation into who within the Bush administration may have leaked the name of a covert CIA operative to Bob Novak, who is a columnist in The Washington Post. Can you say that no one in your office was involved in this?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: Gloria, you need--you get the same answer the president gives when he gets asked this question. This is a matter that is being looked at by the Justice Department. You need to go to the Justice Department if you have any questions about the matter.

BORGER: And that's all you'll say on that?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: That's all.

BORGER: Let me also ask you about the vice presidency. Obviously now John Kerry is in the process of trying to pick his vice president. If you were to wake up tomorrow and discover that, say, John Edwards was going to be the person who was going to debate you, what would come to mind?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: I'd first start out by thinking about the last debate against Joe Lieberman four years ago, which I enjoyed and I thought was a good debate between the two of us. Vice presidents only get to debate once during the course of the campaign. That's probably enough. I'm not sure the country could tolerate more than that. But I look forward to it, whoever it is. I don't know who John Kerry's going to pick. I don't have any idea. But whoever it is, I would expect we'll both do our parts and the debate's an important part of that.

BORGER: Any advice for John Kerry's running mate, whomever he may be--or she?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: Well, I offered to head up his search committee but he didn't accept the offer.

BORGER: Any other advice?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: No.

BORGER: No. Let me just ask you one final question, Mr. Vice President. And that is, for better or worse, your public image in this administration over these last few years has become that of the enforcer. You are an influential foreign policy hard-liner, some would say. You are the hawk in this administration. You are somebody the president listens to. You're the man who had to tell Secretary O'Neil it was time for him to go. So you are the enforcer. Is all of that you?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: Oh, I don't know if I would describe myself in quite those terms, but I can't quarrel with what you said basically. I'm hear to serve the president. I retired from public life in 1993, when I left the Defense Department. The only reason I came back is because he asked me to come back as his running mate. It's been a fascinating four years. I wouldn't have missed it for the world but I'm here to do what he needs to have done.

There's always a temptation on the part of people outside, especially in the press, trying to understand and explain what's happening, to try to attribute what happens in the administration to the subordinates. But the most accurate portrayal is the president of the United States makes the decision and this one especially is actively and aggressively engaged across the board. My job is to offer advice, which I do, to take on assignments which he gives me, which I do, but I say I'm there specifically to serve him any way I can and not worry a lot about what my public image might be. Am I warm and fuzzy or am I perceived as a tough guy? I really don't worry about that. This is probably my last fling in public life and I have no plans to run for anything else when I get through here and I've enjoyed immensely the privilege of serving and look forward to four more years.

BORGER: Mr. Vice President, thank you so much for being with us on CAPITAL REPORT.

Vice Pres. CHENEY: Thank you very much.

BORGER: And back to you, Alan.

MURRAY: Thank you, Gloria. Some very harsh words there for the press, The New York Times in particular, and Senator John Kerry. Gloria will join me after the break for more on this interview with Vice President Dick Cheney. Then later we're going to get reaction to the 9/11 hearings from former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani in an exclusive interview. That and more when CAPITAL REPORT continues on CNBC. ##


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 911commission; alqaedaandiraq; cheney; cheneykicksbutt; dumberthanboxofrocks; mediabias; nyt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-105 next last

1 posted on 06/17/2004 5:02:46 PM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

James Thompson (R) is discussing this right now on Bill O'Reilly show.


2 posted on 06/17/2004 5:05:32 PM PDT by buffyt (Clinton has MALIGNANT NARCISSISTIC personality disODER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Thanks for posting this!

Related Item:

Bush: Iraq Linked With Al Qaeda

3 posted on 06/17/2004 5:06:31 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
FReepers pointed this out in advance
4 posted on 06/17/2004 5:06:41 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Borger still had her Clinton kneepads on. And was also wearing a blue dress with a stain on it. You could not see the stain however, it was covered by the Kerry in 04 button she was wearing.


5 posted on 06/17/2004 5:06:47 PM PDT by Ron in Acreage (Kerry is a threat to national security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Great!!!!


6 posted on 06/17/2004 5:06:55 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

good week for the VP, I think


7 posted on 06/17/2004 5:08:52 PM PDT by gilliam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Gov. Thompson particularly outraged by the NYT article..


8 posted on 06/17/2004 5:09:25 PM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

BTTT


9 posted on 06/17/2004 5:09:36 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Al-Qaeda may still be operating in Iraq. Fortunately, Saddam Hussein is not. At least, he is no longer in the command structure of the few remaining Ba'athist forces.


10 posted on 06/17/2004 5:10:08 PM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buffyt

I'm glad Bush and Cheney are being aggressive on combatting this nonsense.


11 posted on 06/17/2004 5:12:50 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Fox News tonight shows the two co-chairs of the commission both clearly state (today) that there WAS a clear connection between Saddam and Al Qaeda.

The commissioners (one D and the other R) said they didn't know what all the fuss was about. That the connection between the two was clearly established.


12 posted on 06/17/2004 5:12:57 PM PDT by edwin hubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

"At least, he is no longer in the command structure of the few remaining Ba'athist forces."


Nope, it appears that Zarqawi is leading them to some extent.


13 posted on 06/17/2004 5:13:29 PM PDT by cripplecreek (you tell em i'm commin.... and hells commin with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Vice Pres. CHENEY: I disagree with the way their findings have been portrayed. This has been enormous confusion over the Iraq-al-Qaida connection,

The media and the libs are playing a parsing game--shades of the Clinton era.

At least the Administration is finally getting people out onto the talk shows to counter the lib lies.

The Admin needs to improve greatly its PR; find ways to circumvent the mainstream media to get their message out; otherwise, the Administration is going to lose the PR war. And that means Kerry will could very well win in November.
14 posted on 06/17/2004 5:13:51 PM PDT by TomGuy (Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Yes Gloria, The NY Times are a bunch of Clymers.

15 posted on 06/17/2004 5:15:11 PM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
He stuck me as downright nervous and he should be. Its not as though the Democrats are not playing Russian Roulette with the security of the USA and combat forces.

We are entering into unknown territory and boy is this scary.

16 posted on 06/17/2004 5:16:10 PM PDT by Helms
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES. (a) IN GENERAL- That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.

S.J. Resolution 23 - Authorization for Use of Military Force (Enrolled Bill); September 18, 2001

The operative words up there seem to be "aided or harbored."

Did Saddam have to be personally involved in 9/11 for him to have "aided or harbored" those "nations, organizations or persons" who were directly responsible?

Of course not....and evidence of Saddam's personal involvement in a very specific, clandestine decision is unlikely to surface.

17 posted on 06/17/2004 5:17:39 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Well, one Richard Clarke seemed to have thought that there was a connection between Saddam and the terrorists...when he worked for Bubba.
Iraq conspired with Bin Laden to produce WMDs...according to Richard Clarke

...and lets not forget that he was paying off suicide bombers' families to send their kids to blow themselves up for Allah
Salaries For Suicide Bombers
18 posted on 06/17/2004 5:18:17 PM PDT by walford (http://utopia-unmasked.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Hey Media .. Get the plugs out of your ears and PAY ATTENTION

Are you REALLY THAT STUPID???

19 posted on 06/17/2004 5:18:36 PM PDT by Mo1 (That's right Old Media .... WE LOVED PRESIDENT REAGAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
BORGER: Was Iraq involved?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: We don't know.

So why are we there?

20 posted on 06/17/2004 5:19:39 PM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Cheney's pretty worked up about the press distortions. Borger seems very dense. After a thorough explanation from Cheney she can still ask, "bottom line, though...Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11?" (Patiently, again, he replies, "no evidence." Borger doesn't seem to understand that no-evidence is not the same as no-connection.)


21 posted on 06/17/2004 5:19:58 PM PDT by Graymatter (Let's issue a new $40 bill to honor our 40th president)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
John Kerry say this is the worst economy since the Great Depression. That's just wrong. And anybody who hears that says, `What the hell's he talking about?' He doesn't know what he's talking about obviously...

That's the first time I've heard Dick swear.

22 posted on 06/17/2004 5:20:14 PM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

He should be ... these Liberals are gonna get us all killed if they not stop with their Lies


23 posted on 06/17/2004 5:20:27 PM PDT by Mo1 (That's right Old Media .... WE LOVED PRESIDENT REAGAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Trent Lott is on O'Reilly. Lott is advocating creation of an Intelligence Czar position to operate out of the White House and to be responsible for many, but not all, of the intelligence agencies that currently exist.

I thought that's what the new Homeland Security Department Secretary was supposed to be.

More government isn't the answer to terrorism.
24 posted on 06/17/2004 5:20:33 PM PDT by TomGuy (Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

NYT=Pravda.....


25 posted on 06/17/2004 5:20:51 PM PDT by SeeRushToldU_So (Democrats are enemies of the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze; onyx; Texasforever; CyberAnt; BigSkyFreeper; Tamsey; mrs tiggywinkle; redlipstick; ..

FYI Ping


26 posted on 06/17/2004 5:21:27 PM PDT by Mo1 (That's right Old Media .... WE LOVED PRESIDENT REAGAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
I thought that's what the new Homeland Security Department Secretary was supposed to be

That's what I thought too

27 posted on 06/17/2004 5:22:14 PM PDT by Mo1 (That's right Old Media .... WE LOVED PRESIDENT REAGAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: edwin hubble

The "fuss" is about the Leftist pig news media spinning lies. As usual.


28 posted on 06/17/2004 5:22:35 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Dick must have turned up his pacemaker. Sounds like he was on fire, and on target!


29 posted on 06/17/2004 5:24:23 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buffyt

BTT


30 posted on 06/17/2004 5:24:53 PM PDT by CharlotteVRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Hey Media .. Get the plugs out of your ears and PAY ATTENTION

Are you REALLY THAT STUPID???

We of the media resent that remark. Our reporters
poke their heads everywhere to derive the truth.
As shown below, our reporter has looked high,
and it now looking low.



Reporter: No, I see no connection between al-Qaeda and Iraq.

31 posted on 06/17/2004 5:25:30 PM PDT by TomGuy (Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

Damn! Go Big Time! Too bad I missed it.


32 posted on 06/17/2004 5:25:39 PM PDT by petercooper (Now, who's this Joe Mayo everyone's talking about?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: edwin hubble
The commissioners (one D and the other R) said they didn't know what all the fuss was about. That the connection between the two was clearly established.

The problem is that the 9/11 Commission and some of its members operate a direct conduit to the liberal media where they print all the lies unfit to print. The lunatics like Imus, Barnicle, Jay Severin all repeat for the consumption of their listeners the lies and the lies spread.

And the 9/11 Commissioners are too freaking stupid and self improtant to even understand that they are being played. Walking, talking useful idiots.

33 posted on 06/17/2004 5:26:26 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Thanks for the ping. There's another thread on this and I'm reading that first.

Saw Jim Thompson from the commission on O'Reilly say he has heard President Bush and VP Cheney speak on the subject and he said they are absolutely right.

Thompson said today's media stories are all wrong.


34 posted on 06/17/2004 5:26:34 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Thanks! Cheney got riled up. I am looking forward to that debate between him and the Dim Veep candidate.


35 posted on 06/17/2004 5:26:39 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graymatter
Borger seems very dense...

She misquoted this report at least two times during the interview.

36 posted on 06/17/2004 5:27:10 PM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

That was a hell of an interview. The campaign should have Cheney out front talking to the media 24/7. Despite what the other side deceives themselves into thinking, Dick Cheney is a huge asset for the Bush campaign.


37 posted on 06/17/2004 5:28:26 PM PDT by Califelephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

About Gloria Borger:
Gloria Borger is co-anchor of Capital Report. She also pens a biweekly column, “On Politics,” as contributing editor of U.S. News & World Report and is a regular panelist on PBS's "Washington Week in Review." In addition, Borger will also serve as an NBC News special correspondent, contributing to various programs.

Borger most recently served as a special correspondent for CBS News, appearing weekly on Face the Nation and contributing to the CBS Evening News and 60 Minutes II. She joined U.S. News & World Report in 1986 as a political reporter. She previously served as Newsweek's chief congressional correspondent. Borger began her journalism career at the now defunct Washington Star.

Borger is a 1974 graduate of Colgate University in Hamilton, N.Y., where she has served as a member of the board of trustees.


38 posted on 06/17/2004 5:28:58 PM PDT by petercooper (Now, who's this Joe Mayo everyone's talking about?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
BORGER: And they say that there was not one forged and you were saying yes, that there was. Do you know things that the commission does not know?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: Probably.

Dick Cheney is great. He kicked some major butt in this interview.

39 posted on 06/17/2004 5:28:58 PM PDT by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Other Harry
BORGER: Was Iraq involved?
Vice Pres. CHENEY: We don't know.
So why are we there?

Tell me you're not serious.

40 posted on 06/17/2004 5:29:27 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: The Other Harry
So why are we there? Where else should we be? Has she bothered to look at a map? This is the homeland of the enemy
41 posted on 06/17/2004 5:31:55 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
The Admin needs to improve greatly its PR; find ways to circumvent the mainstream media to get their message out; otherwise, the Administration is going to lose the PR war.

Exactamundo. The administration needs to get Trent Lott off the air and get Cheney out there more. He does a great job making the case. Another thing that needs to be done is to confront these talking faces directly asking them why they are deliberately misrepresenting the facts to the American people. We need better P.R. strategery and this is one way to do it.

42 posted on 06/17/2004 5:33:20 PM PDT by capydick ("There's no question I'm an idealist, which is another way of saying I am an American.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
She misquoted this report at least two times during the interview.

Not only that .. after he answered the question .. she asked it again

ARE THESE PEOPLE REALLY THAT STUPID THEY CAN'T PAY ATTENTION???

Maybe we should give them some Riddilin for their ADD

43 posted on 06/17/2004 5:34:59 PM PDT by Mo1 (That's right Old Media .... WE LOVED PRESIDENT REAGAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: The Other Harry

Are you new around here?


44 posted on 06/17/2004 5:37:57 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: capydick
Exactamundo. The administration needs to get Trent Lott off the air and get Cheney out there more. He does a great job making the case. Another thing that needs to be done is to confront these talking faces directly asking them why they are deliberately misrepresenting the facts to the American people. We need better P.R. strategery and this is one way to do it.

A couple of weeks ago, even Brit Hume commented that the Admin PR is 'pathetic.' If Brit sees it [as bad enough to mention on a media broadcast], someone in the WH better wake up and get on the ball. The Admin's losing the PR is their own damn fault; they can't lay that blame on the libs, dems or media. And they need for than touchy-feel-good political ads.
45 posted on 06/17/2004 5:37:59 PM PDT by TomGuy (Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
This must have JUST taken place, as he cites the Thompson comments and Kerry's accusation that the President misled us about Iraq (Kerry is the one misleading, of course).

Last night some of us were discussing the Atta issue, as it was characterized as debunked when the actual report contained no new information. I am always pleased to see my observations comport with VP Cheney:

There's a separate question. The separate question is: Was Iraq involved with al-Qaida in the attack on 9/11?

BORGER: Was Iraq involved?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: We don't know. You know, what the commission says is that they can't find any evidence of that. We had one report which is a famous report on the Czech intelligence service and we've never been able to confirm or to knock it down.

Cheney says more on this issue, but what he says is in fact the state of the record. It has never been proven.....or debunked.

46 posted on 06/17/2004 5:38:14 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

What the hell's he talking about?'

VP Cheney sums up the Kerry candidacy

47 posted on 06/17/2004 5:38:26 PM PDT by The Wizard (Democrats: enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

VP was great...


48 posted on 06/17/2004 5:39:20 PM PDT by The Wizard (Democrats: enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
BORGER: Any advice for John Kerry's running mate, whomever he may be--or she?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: Well, I offered to head up his search committee but he didn't accept the offer.

LOL

49 posted on 06/17/2004 5:41:47 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard

VP is ALWAYS great. VP is twice any candidate the Dims can put forward. He could (should) be POTUS if not for his health.


50 posted on 06/17/2004 5:41:50 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson