Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/09/2004 3:27:34 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale

Looks like we have about 18,000 years more of good weather, huh?


2 posted on 06/09/2004 3:28:20 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

But...but... but, I thought it was all SUVs' and Bush's fault.


4 posted on 06/09/2004 3:32:59 PM PDT by JeeperFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
The Epica team has noticed the interglacial period of 400,000 years ago closely matches our own - because the shape of the Earth's orbit was the same then as it is now.

Can we expect an apology from the envirowackos of Kyoto? Maybe just a little "Oops" from Algore?

9 posted on 06/09/2004 3:39:06 PM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Tiny bubbles of ancient air are locked in the ice

As compared with the air outside that was manufactured, what, last year?

19 posted on 06/09/2004 4:03:21 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Analysis of the ice proves our planet has had eight Ice Ages during that period, punctuated by rather brief warm spells - one of which we enjoy today.

Already I don't like this.

23 posted on 06/09/2004 4:07:23 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

bmp...read later


29 posted on 06/09/2004 4:31:03 PM PDT by shield (The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

So, the human species is the product of an interglacial..... when the cold resumes, so will the species.


33 posted on 06/09/2004 5:28:54 PM PDT by bert (Don't Panic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I wonder how closely they can narrow down a time period when they are looking back across that many years. Really, the C02 levels that they talking about today as so high represent a few years - 10, 20 or so. Averaged across the last century they likely are still really normal. Can they find a section that correlates to a particular century? I wouldn't think so - I think they'd be lucky to be able to identify particular 1000 year time spans. That means that statistically it's meaningless to compare this years C02 to anything they find in the cores.

That would be like taking the last few letters of a book and comparing them to the entire book - "THE END has a far greater representation the the capital E than the rest of the book, demonstrating a trend toward increasing capitalized vowels". Comparing this year to nearly a million years worth of ice core is just as meaningless.


37 posted on 06/09/2004 6:26:26 PM PDT by Kay Ludlow (Free market, but cautious about what I support with my dollars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

bttt


44 posted on 06/09/2004 7:20:25 PM PDT by rightofrush (right of Rush, and Buchanan too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

This could take awhile to analyze; each foot represents 40.4 years.


45 posted on 06/09/2004 7:24:43 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Very interesting. "Tiny bubbles of ancient air are locked in the ice"

What will analysis of the air show I wonder?

47 posted on 06/09/2004 7:38:17 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

How did this get in here. Fire the Editor!

""The next ice-age is not imminent," said Dr Wolff, "and greenhouse warming makes it even less likely"


61 posted on 06/10/2004 8:17:24 AM PDT by PoorMuttly (""Let us speak courteously, deal fairly, and keep ourselves armed and ready." - T. Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam; Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; forester; calcowgirl; hedgetrimmer; B4Ranch; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
The Epica team has noticed the interglacial period of 400,000 years ago closely matches our own - because the shape of the Earth's orbit was the same then as it is now.

Big surprise there!

66 posted on 06/10/2004 3:49:50 PM PDT by farmfriend ( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry; VadeRetro; RadioAstronomer; Ichneumon

Ping.


73 posted on 06/11/2004 4:19:01 AM PDT by Junior (Love isn't always on time. Sometimes you have to pay for it up front.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Catastrophism

74 posted on 05/14/2006 5:02:40 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam; Ernest_at_the_Beach; FairOpinion; StayAt HomeMother
Just adding this to the GGG catalog, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
Gods, Graves, Glyphs PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

75 posted on 05/14/2006 5:03:23 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson