Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Running on Hearsay--John Kerry looks to the black helicopter crowd for votes.
Wall St Journal ^ | March 23, 2004 | LAWRENCE F. KAPLAN

Posted on 03/23/2004 4:36:35 AM PST by SJackson

Edited on 04/22/2004 11:51:20 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

In a campaign soon to be measured in weeks, this promises to be a very good week for Democrats. On Sunday, former counter-terrorism czar Richard Clarke took to the airwaves to accuse the Bush team of ignoring the issue of terrorism for eight months "when maybe we could have done something to stop 9/11" -- leaving unsaid exactly what the Clinton team, of which Mr. Clarke was also a member, was doing for the previous eight years. Today, too, a parade of former Clinton administration officials will appear before Congress, presumably to make the same case. By the end of the week, John Kerry will surely be echoing their claims, with a conspiratorial twist.


(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; kerry; richardclarke

1 posted on 03/23/2004 4:36:36 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson
NOW:

"Please buy my new book which lists the "soft sites" to be targetted by terrorists
all around America; and leaks and leaks and leaks US secrets mixed with my delusions.
Yes, my book IS owned by CBS. Did not Lesley Stahl tell you?.
I was the greatest in DC because I use remote viewing; and I see that my
book will one of "the" future terrorist handbooks.
And don't forget to vote for John Kerry in at least a few states, OK?
"


FLASHBACK:

"Mr. Clarke, Mr. Clarke, this urgent. We can take out Osama. Please!!! We have him in our sight."

Clarke: "Nope. Forgetaboutit. No big deal. They will attack our Apple computers first."


PARTIAL LIST OF TERRORIST ACTIVITIES IGNORED BY CLARKE
AND CONDUCTED BY TERRORISTS SUPPORTED BY CBS (WHICH OWNS CLARKE'S BOOK AS Ms. STAHL REFUSED TO ADMIT)

1993 Attempted Assassination of Pres. Bush Sr., April 14,1993
1993 First World Trade Center bombing, February 26th, 7 Killed, Hundreds injured, Billions
1995 Attack on US Diplomats in Pakistan, Mar 8,1995
1996 Khobar Towers attack
1998 U.S. Embassy Bombing in Peru, Jan 15, 1998
1998 U.S. Kenya Embassy blown up, 100's murdered
1998 U.S. Tanzania Embassy blown up, 100's murdered
1999 Plot to blow up Space Needle (thwarted)
2000 USS Cole attacked, many U.S. Navy sailors murdered


2 posted on 03/23/2004 4:43:22 AM PST by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
hey buchananistas and JBScrewballs are ya listening?
3 posted on 03/23/2004 4:46:16 AM PST by rrrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
God how I hate those pictures from 9/11 - but it is good to see them again every one in a while - helps maintain perspective...
4 posted on 03/23/2004 4:58:06 AM PST by An.American.Expatriate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: An.American.Expatriate
They remind. So will this.

GOTTA HEAR THIS (911 in sound ~ 3 megabytes)

=====> (click here, or download with right mouse button)


5 posted on 03/23/2004 5:01:35 AM PST by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
By the end of the week, John Kerry will surely be echoing their claims, with a conspiratorial twist.... Hence, just as John Kerry says he heard from "a friend of mine who was in Paris the other day" that France really does intend to further America's cause in Iraq, and just as he heard that he has a lock on the votes of foreign leaders, the candidate has also "heard" a series of much more bizarre conjectures....

One could argue, as many do, that the Democratic Party's embrace of the paranoid style in American politics amounts to evidence of vigorous populist dissent... But at this particular historical moment, when the U.S. itself has become the object of murderous conspiracy theories, a line of argument that rejects critical thinking, exploits paranoia at the expense of reason and ignores the contingency of events in search of plots the powerful few implement at the expense of the powerless many -- this is not simply the everyday pollution of political discourse. It is the nullification of political discourse. If it is true that the sleep of reason breeds monsters, then we may awaken in November to a nasty surprise indeed.

To quote candidate Kerry is to mislead the American public.

6 posted on 03/23/2004 5:43:38 AM PST by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Saddam's capture was timed explicitly to give Jim McDermott recurring nightmares.
7 posted on 03/23/2004 5:47:16 AM PST by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
So what... but if he gets the Chemtrail Vote, it might be different.
8 posted on 03/23/2004 5:47:55 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim (Just once I'd like to get by on my looks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
Every time Kerry opens his mouth, the GOP has a new TV ad.
9 posted on 03/23/2004 5:49:20 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; E.G.C.
a line of argument that rejects critical thinking, exploits paranoia at the expense of reason and ignores the contingency of events in search of plots the powerful few implement at the expense of the powerless many . . . is not simply the everyday pollution of political discourse.

It is the nullification of political discourse.

I put it to you that political discourse is not nullified but vigorously exerted here on FR and on the typical "right wing" talk radio show, but it is nullified in news reporting. Political discourse can be nullified only to the extent that the mind is diverted from reason, and the format of discourse known as "news" is designed to do that in two ways:
  1. by rejecting self-criticism, which is the implication of claiming objectivity and using power (in this case, PR power) to "reject labels." That is what journalists do - and journalists allow Teddy Kennedy to do exactly the same thing.
  2. by using the deadline and the arbitrary enforcement of the "rules" which determine what is news and what is not. Journalism's agenda is that journalism be important, the corollary is that what journalism can easily cover is important. Since government happens at a predetermined place and time, journalists know where to be, when, to cover it - in the same way that a sports reporter knows where and when to put his TV camera to capture the drama of a ball game. The principle that the least government is the best government is actual liberalism; the principle that government should be dominant is the ersatz "liberalism" of the socialist.
    Why Broadcast Journalism is
    Unnecessary and Illegitimate

10 posted on 03/23/2004 6:18:44 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (No one is more subjective than the person who believes in his own objectivity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Media bias bump.
11 posted on 03/23/2004 6:48:30 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson