Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE FRENCH WAR FOR OIL
New York Post ^ | March 16, 2004 | KENNETH R. TIMMERMAN

Posted on 03/17/2004 6:28:30 PM PST by katagious

March 16, 2004 -- MANY Americans are convinced even today that the war in Iraq was all about oil. And they're right - but oil was the key for French President Jacques Chirac, not for the United States. In documents I obtained during an investigation of the French relationship to Saddam Hussein, the French interest in maintaining Saddam Hussein in power was spelled out in excruciating detail. The price tag: close to $100 billion. That was what French oil companies stood to profit in the first seven years of their exclusive oil arrangements - had Saddam remained in power.

The French claimed their opposition to the U.S.-led war to oust Saddam Hussein was all about policy. The editor of the Paris daily Le Monde, Jean-Marie Colombani, just resuscitated those arguments in an editorial that singled out George W. Bush as "a threat to the very foundation of the historical alliance between the U.S. and Europe," and called fervently for the election of John F. Kerry. (I guess that F now stands for France.)

But Colombani, whose paper's coverage of the war in Iraq was noteworthy for its wanton disregard for the truth, had not a word to say about his country's war for oil. Indeed, the secret deals the French state-owned oil companies negotiated in the 1990s with Saddam Hussein went widely unreported in France.

Almost as soon as the guns went silent after the first Gulf war in 1991, French oil giants Total SA and Elf Aquitaine - who have now merged and expanded to become TotalFinaElf - sought a competitive advantage over their rivals in Iraq by negotiating exclusive production-sharing contracts with Saddam's regime that were intended to give them a stranglehold on Iraq's future oil production for decades to come.

The first of two massive deals was announced in June 1994 by then-Iraqi Oil Minister Safa al-Habobi - a well-known figure whose name had surfaced in numerous procurement schemes in the 1980s in association with the Ministry of Industry and Military Industrialization, which supervised Saddam's chemical, biological, missile and nuclear-weapons programs.

Speaking in Vienna, al-Habobi confirmed that his government was awarding Total SA rights to the future production of the Nahr Umar oil field in southern Iraq, and that Elf was well-placed to be awarded similar terms in the Majnoon oil fields on the border with Iran.

Those two deals, which I detail in "The French Betrayal of America," would have been worth an estimated $100 billion over a seven-year period - but were conditioned on the lifting of U.N. sanctions on Iraq. Simply put, analyst Gerald Hillman told me, the French were saying: "We will help you get the sanctions lifted, and when we do that, you give us this."

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: france; iraq; iraqioil; oil; oilforfood; totalfinaelf; un

1 posted on 03/17/2004 6:28:31 PM PST by katagious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: katagious
"close to $100 billion...was what French oil companies stood to profit in the first seven years of their exclusive oil arrangements - had Saddam remained in power."

Do you suppose this could be why the French LOVE Kerry and hate Bush???

Do you suppose those mysterious "foreign leaders" who want Kerry elected could be French???

2 posted on 03/17/2004 6:56:24 PM PST by Savage Beast ("Vote Democrat!" ~Kim Jong-Il "Kerry for President" ~Osama bin Laden "Viva Kerry" ~Fidel Castro~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katagious
Total Fina Elf.

Nuf' said.

3 posted on 03/17/2004 7:03:50 PM PST by BikePacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Was this part of your investigating?
4 posted on 03/17/2004 7:04:41 PM PST by Maigrey (Tagline Revoked for refusing to make a Dane-Geld payment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katagious
THE FRENCH WAR FOR OIL

I'm not clear on this. Exactly how many of them have to consecutively share a bathtub to extract a barrel.

5 posted on 03/17/2004 7:08:27 PM PST by Focault's Pendulum (I just realized that because I'm lefthanded, the right side of my brain has been working correctly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maigrey
This is not part of what I was doing. I put up a thread last night when Timmerman was on with Al Rantel on KABC in Los Angeles.
6 posted on 03/17/2004 7:11:54 PM PST by doug from upland (Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: katagious
I don't normally watch or quote "The Simpsons." However, I do believe the phrase "cheese eating surrender monkeys" is appropriate here.

With the French it was under-the-table oil deals. With the Germans it was about protecting their Opium supply for making medicinal drugs like morphine.

These "whores" only care about their own pocket books while using high sounding rhetoric. Reminds me kinda of John Kerry!
7 posted on 03/17/2004 7:13:48 PM PST by Sola Veritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katagious
frog bump
8 posted on 03/17/2004 7:15:21 PM PST by the crow (I'm from the government. I'm here to help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katagious
The price tag: close to $100 billion.

The fools...they could have joined the Coalition and probably made this
money in commerce with a post-Saddam Iraq.
9 posted on 03/17/2004 7:17:49 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katagious
What do you call a Frenckman drenched in oil! ?

Answer: CLEANer..

10 posted on 03/17/2004 7:43:55 PM PST by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katagious
MASTER LIST OIL FOR FOOD SCANDAL
11 posted on 03/17/2004 7:46:26 PM PST by GailA (Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katagious
This can NEVER be repeated enough: from Mark Steyn's column from April 10, 2003, Mark Steyn - Welcome to Anglo-Saxon reality:

France, Germany, Russia, Belgium and Canada are not on the side of peace or morality or the Iraqi people. The pictures from the streets of Baghdad make that plain. But we are on the side of TotalFinaElf. Twice in recent columns, Diane Francis has mentioned, almost en passant, a curious little fact:

The Western oil company with the closest ties to the late Saddam is France's TotalFinaElf. That's not the curious fact, that's just business as usual in the Fifth Republic. This is the curious fact: As Diane wrote in February and again last week, "Total's biggest shareholder is Montreal's Paul Desmarais, whose youngest son is married to Prime Minister Jean Chrétien's daughter."

Let's see if I've got this straight: TotalFinaElf's largest shareholder is a subsidiary of Montreal's Power Corp, whose co-chief executive is Jean Chrétien's son-in-law, Andre Desmarais. Mr. Desmarais' brother, Paul Desmarais Jr., sits on the Total board.

For months, the anti-war crowd has insisted that "it's all about oil," that the only reason the Iraqi people were being "liberated" was so that the second biggest oil reserves in the world could be annexed in perpetuity by Dick Cheney and Halliburton and the rest of Bush's Texas oilpatch gang. Instead, it turns out that, if it is all about oil, then the principal North American beneficiary of the continued enslavement of the Iraqi people is the family of the Canadian Prime Minister -- that's to say, his daughter, France Chrétien, and his grandchildren.

-PJ
12 posted on 03/17/2004 7:51:20 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
People who gravitate to socialist power know that a person doesn't necessarily need money if he can get institutional authority. That position is as good as money.

The folks get along with each other because they all see themselves as part of the glitterati. (Almost as if they believe in an ubermensch.)

Chirac, Kerry, Kennedy, Rockefeller, Mellon.....
13 posted on 03/17/2004 8:35:25 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
For months, the anti-war crowd has insisted that "it's all about oil,"

But this article is agreeing with the 'anti-war' crowd. It's saying that it is all about oil. The pacifists/nihilists are against the industrial-military machine in a global sense. They attack the USA because it's the biggest target, but they hate French capitalism too. I don't think we gain anything by attacking a French oil company.
14 posted on 03/18/2004 1:58:37 AM PST by pau1f0rd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: katagious; All
-"No Blood for Oil"- Kojo & Kofi: Unbelievable U.N. stories--
15 posted on 03/18/2004 3:32:38 AM PST by backhoe (Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the TrackBall into the Sunset...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
That is an excellent point. The ubermensch conviction is an important part of "Liberalism" and marxism.

Some "Liberals," leftists, and marxists, of course, are psychopaths, who are cynically exploiting their followers and are well aware of it.

Others tend to feel that they know and are determined to force everyone else to do their will. Many feel that they are intellectually and morally superior ubermenschen and this gives them vast entitlements and anointments.

Those of both groups are ruthless tyrants and bullies. The belief that they are ubermenschen, anointed, entitled, and superior to everyone else, gives their tyranny and ruthlessness ligitimacy to themselves, their comrades, and their followers.

16 posted on 03/18/2004 4:34:08 AM PST by Savage Beast (Flunk history, and you have to go through the whole mess again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pau1f0rd
The excerpt that I quoted shows that the French "war for oil" was really nepotism in that relatives of Chirac (by marriage) in Canada were the one's to benefit. That's a much tighter connection than to say it is about Bush's "oil buddies," and Dick Cheney and Halliburton because he once worked there.

-PJ

17 posted on 03/18/2004 9:01:22 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Well, I don't know if there was nepotism. Surely people are allowed to have businesses even if their relatives are in government.
18 posted on 03/18/2004 9:13:16 AM PST by pau1f0rd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
Do you suppose those mysterious "foreign leaders" who want Kerry elected could be French???

I'm even wondering if the DNC angel, George Soros has a finger in this pie. Figures like $100 billion usually draw his attention.

19 posted on 03/20/2004 7:39:01 AM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson