Homosexuality and totalitarianism

Jewish World Review ^ | 3/17/04 | Marianne M. Jennings

[Zender500]

Three op-ed topics bring out the Stephen King ids. Topic one: Animals can survive in conditions less charming than a Kennebunkport bed and breakfast. Animal rights activists wish me death by dismemberment. Two: Overeating is responsible for heft. Fat rights activists place curses upon me. A husky idler from New Zealand wished me an early death from my exercise and use of cottage cheese.

Topic three: gay marriage. Homosexual activists are unequaled in both the length and volume of their op-ed mental snaps. They too wish me death by dismemberment, preferably early on, and also hurl curses, but they are Energizer Bunnies. They go on and on and on. Columns from 5 years ago still bring hate mail. Rational discussions or thoughtful rebukes are welcomed, even at 5 years out, but childish attacks grow tiresome. One homosexual correspondent insists that my data on homosexual men having higher education levels are skewed. This chap fervently argues, "The dumb ones stay in the closet."

These groups have three tactics in common: emotion, not rational thought; facts, science, or studies be damned; and hatred toward those who disagree. Gay rights activists have one more trait - they harass the employers of their opponents. Applying economic pressure, they obtain agreement, or, at a minimum, silence. They preach tolerance and acceptance, but are, oddly, totalitarians. I cannot speak for the views of my correspondent's doofuses in the closet.

The rash of defiant homosexual marriages and judicial usurpation of public policy formulation on marriage are further evidence of the gay movement's totalitarian nature. The slumbering and subservient public has finally awakened to the homosexual movement's usurpation of process through press-starved politicos and courts that relish end-runs.

Cornering straights and frightening them into submission is the gay modus operandi. An entire nation is now backed into a corner with the U.S. Constitution's full faith and credit clause serving as one wall and the borrowed emotion of the civil rights movement as the other.

Judicial, media, economic and political forces have allowed the gay movement to run roughshod over complacent straights. Forced silence on the parts of the straights now finds gay marriage an inevitability. I predicted as much years ago. I write now with one additional thought that accompanies policies totalitarians impose: bad idea.

Homosexual activists argue that the straights don't deserve dominance over marriage policy because they have an abysmal record. Moral authority here is misplaced. Dr. Maria Xiridou's 2003 study of Dutch homosexual men found their relationships last an average of 1.5 years. Other studies found an average of 8 partners per year among male homosexuals and near 100% rates of unfaithfulness even in committed relationships, with the longest lasting having some "provision for outside sexual activity." In the U.S., heterosexual first marriages last an average of 10 years. . . .

[Zender500]

BUMP

[LiteKeeper]

read later

[Mears]

When the homosexual activists threw condoms at people coming out of Mass in a Catholic church in Boston a few years back,they lost me forever.

That single incident said it all.

[VRW Conspirator]

Prdon me, Miss Jennings, but I think the word that best describes teh militant gay movement is "sadistic".

[CzarNicky]

Dr. Maria Xiridou's 2003 study of Dutch homosexual men found their relationships last an average of 1.5 years. Other studies found an average of 8 partners per year among male homosexuals and near 100% rates of unfaithfulness even in committed relationships, with the longest lasting having some "provision for outside sexual activity."

Whenever I cite this study at another website I frequent. I hear a cacophony of moronic statements about it. The funniest one is, "this study doesn't mean anything because it is a study of gay men, in Amsterdam"! The depths the left will sink to protect perversion so they can avoid the eye of shame is astounding.

[longtermmemmory]

Applying economic pressure, they obtain agreement, or, at a minimum, silence. They preach tolerance and acceptance, but are, oddly, totalitarians.

These are worth emphasising. Up until this election cycle,
the left and their homosexual lackies could count on imposing silence.
They were able to keep conservative from unifying by imposing silence.
Now conservatives can do more than listen and sometimes call.

The logic of homosexuals in pushing to impose homosexual marriage
must have included a calculus of forced silence of opposing views.
The lamda legal and HRC had to have believed conservatives could
be sileced with claims of homophobe or "religious fanatices.

Perhaps they are also copying some laws (ala 1960 gun laws copied from 1930's nazi germany)

Conservative can fight back by opening their mouths.
I am usually very pleasantly surprised by how many good people
I meet just by saying I am voting for GWBush.

[longtermmemmory]

The relationship may be 1.5 years but the number of sex partners during those 1.5 years is not limited to the one partner.

[little jeremiah]

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

(thanks, Zender500!)

I didn't go to the article to read it all, but so far so good. Except she sounds as though she thinks "gay" marriage is inevitable. I don't. I think the "gay" rights movement is going to die the death it deserves, and the remants will sneak back into the closet.

(Don't worry, I'm not talking about war, blood, or murder. I'm using rhetorical speech. Plus, they're killing themselves with AIDS. People like me aren't killing them with AIDS, they're doing it to their brethren.)

[little jeremiah]

Correction: that would be REMNANTS sneaking...

[EdReform]

Bump

What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda

Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1)

The Stamp of Normality