Skip to comments.
Zoroastrians Fight Extinction
VOANews ^
| 12/23/03
| VOANews
Posted on 12/23/2003 10:01:12 PM PST by freedom44
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-123 next last
1
posted on
12/23/2003 10:01:12 PM PST
by
freedom44
To: freedom44
Three Kings bump.
2
posted on
12/23/2003 10:02:17 PM PST
by
Liberal Classic
(No better friend, no worse enemy.)
To: Doctor Stochastic; SJackson; knighthawk; McGavin999; Stultis; river rat; Live free or die; ...
on or off iran ping.
3
posted on
12/23/2003 10:04:16 PM PST
by
freedom44
To: freedom44
Rohinton Mistry wrote a couple of books which touches upon the Zoroasters in India...interesting reading. "A Fine Balance" is an excellent novel.
4
posted on
12/23/2003 10:07:52 PM PST
by
Guillermo
To: freedom44
Muslims are scratching their heads.... wait... it was not a Zionist Conspiracy afterall... it was a Zoroastrian Conspiracy!!
5
posted on
12/23/2003 10:22:11 PM PST
by
GeronL
(The Revolution should be televised! Imagine the ratings!)
To: freedom44
Zoroastrianism had a tremendous impact on both Judaism and Christianity-especially on Christian ideas about the end of the world.
The Parsis leave the bodies of their dead on the top of towers to be eaten by vultures.
Cool, and very-eco-friendly!
6
posted on
12/23/2003 10:24:12 PM PST
by
WackyKat
To: freedom44
Great post, thanks! I've always wondered about this religion, I'm glad to hear it isn't completely defunct. Maybe once the Mullahs get tossed in Iran it will have a revival.
7
posted on
12/23/2003 10:27:49 PM PST
by
jocon307
(The dems don't get it, the American people do!)
To: freedom44
Zoroastrians, and Parsis in particular, are a fascinating people. Many of them are not particularly religious... and they tend to be smart as all get-out. This makes them ideal marriage partners for people of other cultures... contributing to the decline problem.
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F
To: freedom44
General information: The "Three Wise Men" who journeyed to Bethlehem were of course
magi, Zoroastrian priests and scholars.
Our word "magic" comes from magi.
9
posted on
12/23/2003 10:40:49 PM PST
by
SedVictaCatoni
(You keep nasty chips.)
To: jocon307; freedom44
Great post...thanks from here too... :)
10
posted on
12/23/2003 10:41:35 PM PST
by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
To: freedom44
Isn't Rosicrucianism somehow related?
To: SedVictaCatoni
Who knows how many there were. It could have been two. It could have been dozens. When Daniel and his brethren were in captivity in Persia, they had ample chance to teach their hosts about the Torah, and thus they knew about the Messiah. The predicted star finally shone, and they said let's hop on our camels and get going to worship this Kid.
To: HiTech RedNeck
Who knows how many there were. It could have been two. It could have been dozens. Well, I think that the New Testament account probably would have mentioned it if dozens of Persian mystics had abruptly showed up. That likely would have been the most startling sight ever to occur in Bethlehem.
13
posted on
12/23/2003 10:46:54 PM PST
by
SedVictaCatoni
(You keep nasty chips.)
To: SedVictaCatoni
In Bethlehem itself, maybe. But on the hillsides out in the country I beg to differ. Not some whizbang hairsplitting Jewish philosopher, but outcast ruffian redneck sheepherders (yeehaw!), those were the ones that God first picked to hear the news. Courtesy of a downright righteous passel of angels.
To: SedVictaCatoni
Well it was an impressive enough caravan to get Herod's attention, seeing how he then ordered that all male children under two years of age be killed so that his rival would be eliminated.
15
posted on
12/23/2003 10:59:45 PM PST
by
DryFly
To: DryFly
Yeah, a band of three sounds like it would be a mite puny to have such an effect. Were these dudes particularly wealthy? Or would it take a large group to amass enough gold, frankincense, and myrrh to make a worthy gift?
To: freedom44
I'm sure the world would be a better place if all Muslims converted to Zoroastrianism. But, aside from that, I suppose I don't have a whole lot to say about this :)
To: DryFly
[would it take a large group to amass enough gold, frankincense, and myrrh to make a worthy gift?] (They reached into their "treasures"... doesn't sound quite like Bill Gates hauling out "small change" from his wallet)
To: freedom44
He bitterly complains that evil rulers attacked just and innocent people, that the rich robbed the poor, that judges produced false decisions in order to aid their benefactors. Sounds like he met Clinton and the democratic party.
19
posted on
12/23/2003 11:09:36 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
(Resolve to perform what you ought, perform without fail what you resolve.)
To: freedom44
Cool article. I always took Zoroasterianism to be a fairly sane religion as such things go, and with many ideas that would be very familiar to most modern monotheistic religions. As the article points out, nobody really knows precisely how old the religion is, but it is one of the older religions currently practiced and easily pre-dating both Christianity and Islam by a wide margin.
20
posted on
12/23/2003 11:09:49 PM PST
by
tortoise
(All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-123 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson