Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UFO Invasion at Rendlesham on the SCI FI channel (Live Thread)
www.scifi.com ^ | Friday, December 12, 2003 | Bryant Gumbel

Posted on 12/12/2003 5:37:54 PM PST by Momaw Nadon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-187 next last
To: FreedomCalls
The OSI is secretive and does mysterious things.

But it's a very experienced and well known org with a wide diversity of methods uncommon to normal police and investigative work.

It's understandable that you don't know that. One might suggest humility when in possession of significant ignorance of a topic.
101 posted on 12/12/2003 10:03:15 PM PST by Quix (Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
I've known for a long time that there was likely more than one landing site in this situation. This is not that much new information. It wasn't made a big deal of before. But it has been in the literature for a long time per witness reports.

Your skepticism still seems to be in charge of your logic.
102 posted on 12/12/2003 10:04:32 PM PST by Quix (Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
You are simply wrong on a number of points of fact.

I gather you have not read the record to any significant degree.
103 posted on 12/12/2003 10:06:13 PM PST by Quix (Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Uhhhh, hello?

They did NOT spend ALL their time looking ONLY through their scopes!

Sheesh!
104 posted on 12/12/2003 10:07:42 PM PST by Quix (Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
FOR SURE.
105 posted on 12/12/2003 10:08:15 PM PST by Quix (Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Riiiight. Sure there are.

<backing away slowly>

106 posted on 12/12/2003 10:08:41 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: lstanle
For sure.

And he wasn't the only one seeing it more or less up close and personal, as I recall.
107 posted on 12/12/2003 10:09:07 PM PST by Quix (Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Actually,

I consider CLINTON NASTY NUMBNUTS

TO BE EXCEEDINGLY LESS TRUSTWORTHY

than the SciFi channel's

FICTION shows.
108 posted on 12/12/2003 10:11:47 PM PST by Quix (Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Yet your uh, ..."logic," tells you that little alien men in an interplanetary spacecraft landed in the woods that night.
109 posted on 12/12/2003 10:12:27 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Uhhhhh, hello . . . ?

It doesNOT matter whether it was the light ship or the light house.

He could clearly see a craft in the air which clearly did not fit either the lighthouse or the light ship.

I can imagine you reporting an incident and many of us not believing you because of your . . . logic or manner or some such.

This is not the case with my reading of these witnesses.

110 posted on 12/12/2003 10:14:14 PM PST by Quix (Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Quix
So do the same experiment then. Play the tape and time the observations. You will find the period to be precisely the same as the rotation of the Orfordness lighthouse. The Shipwash lightship beacon flashed at a faster rate still.
111 posted on 12/12/2003 10:15:10 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Quix
I think this was an authentic ET UFO.

What are your main arguments to support this assertion?

112 posted on 12/12/2003 10:15:30 PM PST by Momaw Nadon (Goals for 2004: Re-elect President Bush, over 60 Republicans in the Senate, and a Republican House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
Welllllll, if you believe he was lying,

I think you have not interviewed many people

and/or

you are so skeptical that it wouldn't matter how accurate your personality etc. assessment skills were.

I found him exceedingly believable. I found it highly unlikely he was even consciously or unconsciously distorting things very significantly and far to ridiculous that he would be lying.
113 posted on 12/12/2003 10:16:03 PM PST by Quix (Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Raht.

Triangular 3 point indentations in the soil would clearly have NOTHING to do with a triangular craft.

/sarcasm.
114 posted on 12/12/2003 10:17:20 PM PST by Quix (Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Not at all convincingly to me.

His argument has holes big enough to drive a convoy of semi's through.
115 posted on 12/12/2003 10:18:31 PM PST by Quix (Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Pro-Bush
Thanks.

Just too many puzzle pieces in that direction.

1) Their usual tendency to dink around with, probe, even disable nuclear weapons seems to be repeated in this case.
116 posted on 12/12/2003 10:19:38 PM PST by Quix (Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Quix
I don't doubt that they saw something, and they realize the credibility they are putting on the line in coming forward.

It would take a very profound event to coax someone out of their comfort zone into the spotlight of world opinion. Some think it was an ET event, others think it's some secret aircraft of our own, and other's think it's a visit from residents of our own future that have traveled back in time.

In the bible Daniel records such events as being a result of the "watchers" and the "ancient ones". Rather than being ET's the bible refers to them as super natural immortals from another dimension, perhaps a spiritual dimension. I think I can buy that easier than them being from another planet. No matter how fast the craft, it would take many lifetimes to travel here from another planet.
117 posted on 12/12/2003 10:20:01 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Quix
He could clearly see a craft in the air which clearly did not fit either the lighthouse or the light ship.

That's where you are mistaken. It DID fit the lighthouse. He thought he was seeing both the UFO and the lighthouse. But the directions he gave match up with the lightship being at the location he thought was the lighthouse and the lighthouse being at the location he thought was the UFO. He thought he was seeing the UFO and the lighthouse, but he was actually seeing the lightship and the lighthouse. Like I said, the lightship was not always lit and he was not familiar with it.

118 posted on 12/12/2003 10:20:47 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
That the lighthouse theory is a

shallow, transparent, obvious

pile of horse manure

several times bigger than the UFO(s) involved.
119 posted on 12/12/2003 10:20:48 PM PST by Quix (Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Back away all you wish.

You will have to deal with the reality in your lifetime. And it is not likely to be smooth or pretty though it may be billed that way depending on how the puppet masters feel they can best play it to their best advantage.

I suppose I could apologize for getting so weary of folks who are clearly little read in the extensive literature of the last 50 years.

And I suppose I can't blame you for not having had close relatives or friends involved with such craft and programs.

But your dogmatic, religious skepticism still rather annoys me and somewhat still surprises me.
120 posted on 12/12/2003 10:24:33 PM PST by Quix (Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson