Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Graymatter
Au contraire~~~~~~~~~

You really ought to read the June 6 2nd DCA opinion before you commit yourself to this statement.

From that opinion: "The Schlindlers have urged this court to conduct a de novo review of the evidence in this case, primarily because of the finality of this decision for their daughter."

The court then correctly pointed out that "it would be improper to reveiw such a fact-intensive determination using a de novo standard." The Judges of the appellate court then "closely examined all of the evidence in this record". They go on to say:

"We have repeatedly examined the video tapes, not merely watching short segment but carefully observing the tapes in their entirety. (emph. added) We have examined the brain scans with the eyes of educated laypersons and condsidered the explanations provided by the doctors in the transcripts. We have concluded that, if we were called upon to review th guardianship's decision de novo, we would still affirm it". (emph. added)

It would seem that while the de novo review "is not appropriate" from a legal standpoint, what they did in arriving at their decision was a de novo review.

If you would take the time to read this opinion in its entirety you will see the lengths the Court went to in arriving at their decision.

When I read this extrordinary decision, I wept.

318 posted on 11/03/2003 4:56:52 PM PST by daylate-dollarshort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]


To: daylate-dollarshort
If you would take the time to read this opinion in its entirety you will see the lengths the Court went to in arriving at their decision.

Do you have a link?

328 posted on 11/03/2003 6:33:51 PM PST by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies ]

To: daylate-dollarshort
Now that's de novo! Someone suggesting that I, Graymatter, do more reading :)
Your original remark was about the Florida Supreme Court and the US Supreme Court. "Are all the judges biased?" Now you are talking about the DCA. As you point out they refused to re-try the case, which is what I said also. BTW, examining all the evidence, as they claim to have done, is not all there is to re-trying the case.
335 posted on 11/03/2003 8:08:23 PM PST by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies ]

To: daylate-dollarshort
>>When I read this extrordinary decision, I wept.

For what? The "freak of nature?"
336 posted on 11/03/2003 8:10:55 PM PST by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson