Posted on 11/25/2016 10:37:38 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Former Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein has raised nearly $5 million to fund efforts to push for a recount in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. This has led to speculation over what Stein hopes to gain from a potential recount or if she is being used by billionaire investor George Soros or Bill and Hillary Clinton. ‘Stacy on the Right’ Show Host Stacy Washington weighed in on the potential factors driving the push for a recount.
“I saw something interesting this morning on ‘The Hill’ by writer Mary Chastain and she talked about the big deal with Donald Trump saying that he wouldn’t go forward with prosecution on Hillary emails, Hillary Clinton’s email scandal,” Washington told the FOX Business Network’s Charles Payne.
Washington suggests that Trump’s forgiveness of Hillary Clinton shifts her out of the spotlight she desires.
“I thought it was interesting, she [Mary Chastain] points out that the thing that the Clintons crave the most is power and to continue to have influence in Washington, D.C. And by forgiving her he would take away that spotlight.”
Washington explained that this has led to the speculation that Stein’s push for a recount is actually part of a plot by the Clintons to contest the election results without having their names associated with it....
(Excerpt) Read more at foxbusiness.com ...
Yeah, well, we’re all a little paranoid about the Clintons. This will amount to nothing.
They went so far to the left. They forced reality to address them. Looks like they are going to go on for a while.
Where a court has to issue an order, it should be simple. The judge should ask Stein if she is filing on her own behalf or another candidate. If she denies doing it for Clinton, which she would, then the judge should dismiss it as Stein has no chance of winning no matter what.
To hack the voting machines in WI, a person would have to have physical control of the voting machines. I am going to guess that the Russians didn’t have physical control of the machines. :>) So, in other words, Jill Stein, Soros, Hillary and all her globalist backers was FOS when mentioning the Russians hacking voting machines.
Also, Stein and her creeps act like they want to assure integrity in the votes. I wonder if they would be doing this if Hillary had won? LOL!
The judge should ask Stein if she is filing on her own behalf or another candidate.
She could say on behalf of herself to assure integrity of the vote for the American people. If it goes before a liberal judge like I am sure they have placed, it wouldn’t matter.
Busted! Jill Stein’s Election Recount Is Being Paid For By a Bot!
http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=50879
Soros could have thousands of bots or even botnets in the USA donating to Jill Stein’s website.
Stein had to let them in to pass the “Prove you’re not a robot” tests.So Soros , Stein, Hillary in on this “recount” in WI , PA ,MI, a scheme to flip all 3.
Don’t know all the details just a tiny bit. soros knows it all and this was plan 3 after his paid riots etc. Soros is funding most of this recount in WI
Soros and Hillary broke campaign finance laws. This recount in WI is sedition and illegal .Soros and Hillary must be arrested for this treason.
Roger Stone on Twitter: “Jill Stein “recount funded by Soros
https://mobile.twitter.com/RogerJStoneJr/status/802230392493404160
Please Notify Trump about it.
I’m tweeting the Trump team. could use some help on twitter getting this to Trump.
perhaps. but more likely she’s a Soros pawn, with Soros still trying to destablize America any which way he can (and if this were to wind up “electing” (sic!) HilLIARy, Soros would consider that an extra bonus for his $7 million pocket-change investment in Stein’s recount
I love how we’re lectured in the minutiae of cybersecurity by a woman who thinks anti-polio vaccines cause autism and cell phones turn you into the X-Men.
Bitch knows she may have cost Hillary States like WI & MI so she’s trying to get good with Democrats but other people at FOX are saying she’s playing Democrats for $$$ coming in for her recount LOL
Stein is the straw person to collect the money (and pocket her %) and filing the papers for the recount in two states. But there's absolutely no reason to raise and spend that kind of money to request a recount for herself. She can't win with a recount. So she claims it's to protect the integrity of the system. I call that BS. All she wants is her cut for being the public face of this scam.
This recount is only going to potentially benefit one campaign, Clinton's. This is the hilLIARy operation trying to keep their hands from getting overtly dirty by having Stein be their bagman. But be certain, this is coming from the Loser Beast. It's either being funded by Soros or the Clinton Criminal Enterprise or both, funneled through a "legitimate fundraising" vehicle to barely mask what is really going on.
Waiting for the MSM to present their in-depth reporting here. Chirp, chirp, chirp....
Stein is just raking in money from the libtards with butthurt. LOL.
I hope this treachery does not delay the inauguration.
Of course she is!!! No other explanation makes sense.
isn’t that idea a big ‘duh’? Nobody else has anything to gain.
Keep on recounting the votes until the liberal or Democrat (whichever) wins.
Worked for Al Franken in 2008, in race for Senator of Minnesota. Took eight months.
There is no way for the vote recount to be accomplished in time for the December 19 deadline for the electoral college. Especially the way the suit is asking for the recount to be done. Technically, a certification is impossible.
I think you are right. This recount insanity is all about Hillary. She will do anything to become president. Anything.
Democrats will be doing the counting.
If they can manufacture enough votes, she can challenge Trump’s presidency. At the very least, she can undermine him.
Yup.
She’s doing penance for taking the election from Hillary, afraid the Clinton Crime Foundation might add her to their long list of people who are dead...........
It is ridiculous that a candidate who has a zero chance of being declared the winner in a recount can have standing to force a recount.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.