Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Cruz Endorse Trump?
PJ MEDIA ^ | 5-28-2016 | MICHAEL VAN DER GALIEN

Posted on 05/29/2016 7:26:15 AM PDT by Brookhaven

owa radio host Steve Deace -- who was one of Ted Cruz's most important backers in the first primary state and who has a nationally syndicated radio show -- recently asked his followers on Twitter whether they want Senator Ted Cruz to publicly endorse Donald Trump.

The results show that 83% say no, while only 17% say they want Cruz to use his political capital to help Trump.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Iowa; New York; Texas; Campaign News; Parties
KEYWORDS: 2016election; 2016endorsements; cruz; dominionist; election2016; iowa; newyork; nothingburgers; radiodemagogue; stevedeace; tedcruz; texas; theocracy; trump; twitter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-196 last
To: Windflier

That should have said crs.

I hate autofill. Tricks me every time


181 posted on 05/29/2016 3:25:07 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

At this point, to hell with his endorsement.


182 posted on 05/29/2016 3:33:47 PM PDT by Rastus (#AlwaysTrump #NeverHillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon
I most certainly am on the right forum.

No, you're not. If you're not supporting the GOP nominee, you need to get the hell out.

Bye.

183 posted on 05/29/2016 4:00:42 PM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57

Keep in mind that the Rules for the 2016 Convention haven’t even been prepared as of yet.
The 112 member Rules Committee will meet the week or so before the Convention to develope
the Rules which will be presented to the Convention for adoption. I’m not sure of the
process to change, delete, etc the Rules that are presented. Remember the Rule was
changed in 2012 on the number of states needed to place a name in nomination. It was
raised to eight states to keep Paul’s name out of nomination.

It will be interesting to see if this is a smooth process or a very continious convention.


184 posted on 05/29/2016 4:19:44 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Roos_Girl
It's weird how you dogmatic Cruz supporters ... not all ... but the one's like you ... speak just like Cruz, with smarmy condescension and self righteousness.

Wake up from your arrogant intellectual dream state! Leadership, which is what the country needs, is not about winning the debate. That's why it's called 'LEADERship' and not 'DEBATORship.'

You should all give up politics for 3 years and go actually build something, start a business, learn basic sills of connecting with other human beings, and then come back and tell how you see things differently.

Within your narrow context of thought, where you have set up, studied, practiced, rehearsed the framework of facts, where you have chosen the architecture and context of that about which you will argue, all things which all of us dumb Trump supporters already understand (you socio-emotional retard!) you are completely right (much of the time), and you will never understand why merely 'being right' is not what reality cares about, because reality operates within total reality, not the narrow little sandbox in which you construct your debate.

So Croos-girl, understand this about your argument and your candidate and your small intellectual-only-on-paper-only world - a fact of reality (rather than a fact in your intellect) about which there is no debate:

You are right, dead right.

185 posted on 05/29/2016 5:58:09 PM PDT by tinyowl (A equals A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: tinyowl; Roos_Girl
It's weird how you dogmatic Cruz supporters ... not all ... but the one's like you ... speak just like Cruz, with smarmy condescension and self righteousness. ...

...and you will never understand why merely 'being right' is not what reality cares about, because reality operates within total reality, not the narrow little sandbox in which you construct your debate. ...


186 posted on 05/29/2016 6:08:55 PM PDT by WVKayaker (What separates the winners from the losers is how a person reacts to each new twist of fate -D.Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: tinyowl

Bless your heart. I might agree with you except that the person(s) I originally replied to asked about the conscience clause and the answers given were incorrect. If I know the answer to a question I will answer it, and if I don’t I will either say I don’t know or I won’t comment to begin with. In this case I gave a correct information along with the link I got the information from. Everyone is welcome to read and critique with references of their own to refute. I can’t help it nor do I care if people don’t like the answer. Have a good weekend.


187 posted on 05/29/2016 6:19:08 PM PDT by Roos_Girl (The world is full of educated derelicts. - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Roos_Girl
"In this case I gave a correct information along with the link"

Yeah, exactly ... on paper ... you were right.

What else, not on paper, was included? Part of why your candidate is so unpopular can be found in the correct answer to that question. But the answer to that question can not be found on paper.

Stretch yourself Roos ... there is something for you to learn in this. Bless your heart back.

188 posted on 05/29/2016 6:27:03 PM PDT by tinyowl (A equals A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: tinyowl

I have no idea what you’re talking about. There was no discussion about popularity. It was just a discussion of the process. I’m an engineer, not a politician. I talk in facts and figures, not feelings. I appreciate frank discussion. I’m not in to guessing or reading meaning in to what other people have written. I write what I mean as best I can. If you don’t like blunt conversation then you should discuss with someone else.

There was a question. I provided an answer. Like I said, I don’t care if people don’t like the answer. I am simply the messenger.


189 posted on 05/29/2016 6:45:34 PM PDT by Roos_Girl (The world is full of educated derelicts. - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: StAntKnee

You said it well.


190 posted on 05/29/2016 7:43:54 PM PDT by CrimsonTidegirl (Proud Islamophobe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher

I think I will stay. Someone has to be a voice of sanity for the lunatics like you.


191 posted on 05/29/2016 7:52:42 PM PDT by ColdSteelTalon (Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon

GFY.


192 posted on 05/29/2016 9:28:52 PM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher

You have a lack of self-control. A feature of lunatics and democrats.


193 posted on 05/29/2016 11:00:22 PM PDT by ColdSteelTalon (Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon
Cite the law or court cases to back up what you say.

How does the Constitution presently read. 'Natural born', because NO judge or act of Congress can make anyone a 'natural born' US citizen... YES, this nation played dumb and allowed obama to hold the office, and the 'republicans' calling themselves conservative went underground. Conservatives would never ever subvert the Constitution... I have know since the late 60's what the founders intent was when they require only a 'natural born' US citizen was eligible to hold the office of president. And Cuban Canadian born Ted Cruz is not now nor will he ever be a 'natural born' US citizen. He knows what the framers original intent was, but he is a diabolical narcissist and believes that he is entitled.

Even after Ted Cruz, carried Mitch the Senate's water, Mitch the Senate refused to 'resolve' that Ted Cruz was eligible to hold the office of president like the Senate did for lord McCain. Cruz is a fraud.

194 posted on 05/30/2016 12:44:08 PM PDT by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon

I apologize for my nasty comment. Hope you can forgive.


195 posted on 05/31/2016 5:09:39 PM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher
I apologize for my nasty comment. Hope you can forgive.

Forgiven.

196 posted on 06/01/2016 6:48:36 PM PDT by ColdSteelTalon (Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-196 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson