Replies

"Has refusing to vote for a RINO and letting the Democrat win ever worked?"

I'd say that on a large scale, IT HASN'T BEEN TRIED YET!
Oh sure, there were a small percentage that did that, but less than 5 percent at the most.

The lesson to learn, and the lesson the LAME Stream Media and the "ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS" (in lock step with the DemocRATs) are trying to cover up ~ WAS TAUGHT BY RONALD REAGAN and HOW HE CAMPAIGNED.

"Trying to convince the establishment Republicans not to nominate RINOs ..."

What makes you think I'm ""Trying to CONVINCE the "ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS" not to nominate RINOs" ?

I'm NOT trying to CONVINCE !
I'm trying to DESTROY "ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS".
They will NEVER AGAIN get my vote !

I'd say that on a large scale, IT HASN'T BEEN TRIED YET!

Where were you in 2008?

Conservatives sat out the election in droves. What did it get us? A marxist president whose only prior experience was as a community organizer and who is dedicated to destroying the United States, along with Democrat super-majorities in both the House and Senate.

Obama won a larger percentage of the popular vote than any Democrat presidential candidate since Lyndon Johnson in 1964 (one year after Kennedy was assassinated). You would think that might have sent some kind of message to the Republican Party.

So how did the Republican Party respond? Nominating Mittens Romney for President in 2010.

You cannot send the Republican Party a message by electing Democrats. It has never worked and it will never work. Electing Democrats just feeds into the false narrative that conservatives cannot win national elections because of changing demographics. Conservatives cannot win national elections because they don't get nominated.

Do whatever it takes to get a conservative candidate nominated in 2016 and then fight like hell to get him elected by a landslide. That is the only thing that will ever send a message.