Posted on 12/27/2010 9:23:21 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Why are so many long-shot or no-shot Republicans making noises about running for president? Howard Kurtz on the would-be candidates—and the upside of getting yourself mentioned.
******
You may be unaware that Mike Pence is on the verge of deciding whether to run for president.
“Pence Announcement Looms in January,” a Politico headline blared the other day.
Looming is a great journalistic verb, suggesting that the masses await, eyes turned upward, the great man’s decision. Which isn’t to suggest that the Indiana congressman—who may run instead for governor, a decision that looms over all Hoosiers—isn’t worthy of the Oval Office. It’s just that so many Republicans of all shapes and stripes are eyeing that office that it’s hard to keep track.
There are five basic reasons why everyone and his brother—not to mention one caribou-slaying mama—are contemplating the rigors of a White House campaign:
—They look in the mirror. Lightning might strike, and they could win.
—Barack Obama looks beatable. Which means they could be the ones to take our country back from the not-so-closeted socialist and restore the Constitution.
—They could use the exposure. Why else did Alan Keyes, Dennis Kucinich, Al Sharpton, Ron Paul, Mike Gravel, Fred Thompson, Carol Moseley-Braun, Pat Buchanan, Jim Gilmore, Duncan Hunter, Gary Bauer and Pete DuPont run? None of them had a snowball’s chance of winning, but they got to stand on the stage during the endless debates and be profiled by top-flight reporters.
—They already feel like big shots. Members of Congress in particular are surrounded by sycophantic staffs and are always rushing to subcommittee hearings to insert language in arcane bills. They don’t realize most of the country hasn’t heard of them.
—They are bored. Running for president is a good way to see the country and sample tasty hotel food—at least in Iowa and New Hampshire, since most candidates get knocked out by then.
Against this backdrop, President Pence doesn’t sound so far-fetched.
You already know about those the press has put in the first tier of 2012 aspirants. Mitt Romney has been running since the day he conceded to John McCain last time around. Sarah Palin may be running for celebrity-in-chief, but her reality-show escapades have positioned her for a White House bid that would defy the lamestream media. Mike Huckabee, a long shot in 2008 until he won the Iowa caucuses, would be a credible candidate if he can bring himself to give up his Fox News gig. (If he doesn’t have financial and party support, Huckabee told me a year ago, “I'm not going to jump in a pool with no water.”)
What about the others?
Newt Gingrich (the third Fox commentator in the bunch) seems to threaten to run every four years, hyping his book sales in the process. He’s a big-think guy with lots of ideas, plausible on paper, and recently said he is “more inclined” to think a 2012 campaign is “doable.” (That’s the kind of language you use when it’s a looong tease.) But Gingrich brings a lot of baggage and scars from his days as speaker, and he knows it.
Tim Pawlenty must be running—he’s launching a book tour, with stops in Manchester and West Des Moines, next month. The outgoing Minnesota governor has a solid, fiscally conservative record and was on McCain’s short list for veep. Problem: No one would call him an exciting politician, so Pawlenty may have to rent some charisma.
From there the odds get longer.
John Bolton, a hard-line former undersecretary of State who could never get himself confirmed as U.N. ambassador, is also dreaming of 2012—and is featured on the cover of the latest National Review. Won’t the fact that the Fox analyst has no history of talking about domestic issues, uh, hamper him? “National security issues have to be brought back to center stage,” he told the magazine.
Haley Barbour also has cover-boy cred this week, in the Weekly Standard. Unfortunately for him, his gauzy recollections of life in segregated Mississippi not being so bad sparked a media furor that forced a hasty retreat. Barbour is a skilled pol who handled Katrina well and raised a boatload of money for the Republican governors. But he was a big-time Beltway lobbyist and now has a racial cloud hanging over his head.
John Thune, whose claim to fame is ousting Tom Daschle in South Dakota, certainly has the looks. “Handsome and athletic,” writes ex-Bush speechwriter David Frum, a perfect conservative voting record, and “an almost equally perfect absence of dangerously memorable utterance or action.” Oops. But Thune has plenty of company on that score.
Mitch Daniels, the Indiana governor and a former Bush budget director, has a tax-cutting record and told the Standard that the next president should “call a truce on the so-called social issues.” Great! But those issues are what motivate the Christian conservatives who show up in GOP primaries. Also, Daniels is short (5-7). Not that such things matter.
Rick Santorum (yet another horse from the Fox stable) has spent at least 14 days in Iowa since the last election and is clearly itching to run. Downside: He lost his Pennsylvania Senate seat in 2006 by a near-landslide. Perhaps that sort of thing builds character.
The Donald? “For the first time in my life, I'm actually thinking about it,” Trump told Fox News. (That’s funny; Trump said in early 2000 there was a “very good possibility” he’d mount a $100-million campaign for the Reform Party nomination.) Presumably he realizes he could spend a fortune and still get fired by the electorate with Apprentice-like swiftness. Running would be a riskier bet than buying another casino.
And then there’s Gary Johnson, a former New Mexico governor who wants to legalize marijuana and doesn’t hide the fact that he’s done his share of pot smoking. Maybe he’ll win the nomination if all the primary voters are high.
Oh, and Jeb Bush? Well, he’s got name recognition.
If you’re a Republican mulling a run and I’ve left you out, feel free to e-mail me.
With this large a potential field—the Democrats trotted out only “Seven Dwarfs” in 1988—it’s no wonder that any unindicted Republican can fantasize about getting in. The Dems have a history of outsider candidates catching fire: Jimmy Carter, Gary Hart, Howard Dean. The Republicans tend to anoint the next in line, and this time there is no heir apparent.
The early skirmishing has basically resembled pattycake: Huckabee (who once lost 110 pounds) defending Michelle Obama’s anti-obesity campaign against a swipe from the former Alaska governor–“with all due respect to my colleague and friend Sarah Palin.” Why fire your ammunition now when no one, except underemployed political reporters, is paying attention?
I’m not suggesting it’s an impossible climb for many of these lawmakers and governors, current and former, to reach the nomination. You win a primary or two and you can get awfully famous awfully fast in our media culture. Just ask the skinny kid with the funny name who spoke at the 2004 Democratic convention.
But let’s face it: every presidential race attracts its share of ego-tripping attention-mongers who revel in the all-too-brief spotlight. And we are about to enable a whole new batch of them.
Two other reasons the author left out:
1. Auditioning for VP. If Biden hadn’t run earlier, he wouldn’t have been on the radar.
2. Practice run for later. Huckabee’s odds in 2008 weren’t great. He did well enough to be labeled “front-runner” this time around.
The way this reads, it looks like just an excuse for Kurtz to single out our roster and slam them as dunces and fools. The bottom line is that our weakest candidates like Bolton and Pence still have a far better shot against this garbage in the WH.
Kurtz should examine how his party got stuck with such a loser and what are they going to do about it before the primary.
Only in Bizarro World does a man who’d probably be the best Secretary of State in 100 years considered a “weak” candidate.
We know who we are voting for and it’s up to them to find out after the new conservative POTUS takes office.
Let them try to divide us all they want.
Don’t doubt it. “Journalists” from now until November 2012 are going to jeer at any and all non-RINO Republicans. The other thing they’re going to do is attack Republican candidates with conservative-posing PSYOPS “analysis” articles. They’re going to do their best to scare the public about cost cuts and make “austerity” into a swear word to tack on any successful Republican. If these candidates think they can curry favor with the MSM instead of confronting it at every opportunity, they’ve already lost. The MSM is fighting for its life.
“They’re going to do their best to scare the public about cost cuts and make “austerity” into a swear word to tack on any successful Republican.”
Is the American Electorate so stupid that they will prefer to have their Life savings stolen from them and do with nothing Rather than Keep their savings and have to do with less?
Perhaps, They elected the American Mugabe!
http://www.aipnews.com/talk/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=18211&posts=2
“John Bolton supports “gay” “marriage”, refuses to address the moral questions posed by abortion
AIP-Approved Constitutional Watchdogs -> Patrick Flynn’s “Republican” Watch
Bolton is talking about running for president, and up until now it has been virtually impossible to find out anything concerning his views about the core moral questions of our day. That is no longer the case.
Townhall:
Reiterating a point he made to the Daily Caller, Bolton confirms he’s willing to rankle some social conservatives by positioning himself to the Left of [Alleged] President Obama by explicitly voicing support for gay marriage. “I think [same-sex marriage] is something that in society today, we ought to be able to live with,” he says. “I don’t, however, think this is a matter to be adjudicated in federal courts. I don’t think the Constitution speaks to the question at all. It’s an issue that ought to be primarily decided at the state level, rather than being handed down by judicial edict.”
He also makes really stupid remarks about abortion:
The question that Roe poses is not whether the Court was right or wrong on abortion; it’s whether it was right or wrong as a matter of Constitutional jurisprudence.”
He could serve honorably... but not as CiC.
LLS
Huckabee's prominence this round is attributable to a RINO controlled GOP that's scared to death of Sarah Palin, but can't for their very life produce a candidate that's even remotely acceptable to the American people, so they've resorted to recycled failures.
All Sarah needs to do is announce.
And I leave that to her keen sense of judgment and timing.
{Pause}
Howie here is making some great points. As much as I love many of the personages here-- he is right on target about most of these things.
I learned a hard lesson back in 1996. I was a Phil Gramm guy. I stuffed envelopes and did fund raising calls for his campaign in downtown D.C. after working night shifts. He was everything that I wanted in a possible President.
But his campaign, well funded as it was, went nowhere. And mind you, Phil Gramm was a bigger name than Mike Pence or John Thune.
In our hyperactive 24/7 media environment, charisma and stage presence are HUGH. Being solid on policy issues is simply not enough. A great candidate communicates those ideas to people in terms that can be grasped by them. Ronaldus Magnus was not called The Great Communicator for nothing.
(Yes, Obama's image makers Communicate well too-- they just lie about what he really believes.)
In a land where an empty suit socialist like obama can get elected everyone has a shot............
The whole point of the article, I think, is to conflate Sarah Palin with the pool of long-shot, no-way-in-hell candidates. It is an illusion. As other posters have said, all she needs to do is announce, and this becomes a whole different deal.
It’s funny the flavor of the week, Herman Cain , is not even mentioned...that’s gotta sting!
I now hope they all run. I had been fearful of the establishment splitting the conservative base to elect Romney with a plurality, but now I think the more the merrier, because Sarah’s support is rock solid, and these dwarfs will just divide the anti-Palin vote.
She has a built in 30% from the Palnista’s and Tea Party activists...that should be enough to win in a ten to twelve candidate (or more) field.
This is going to be fun to watch.
“What percentage of the government, much less the electorate, predicted the last housing and banking crisis?”
You have a good point. Most people were Blind sided by this.
Bush tried to reform the Lending rules under the CRA but Barney said Fanny and Freddie were good.
As an example, Lets use Gold. Two years ago I stopped buying Gold because the Price was getting too high for me. Lots of other people kept buying. Today Gold is over 1400. Is that Real value or just a Speculative Bubble?
The same could be said of the housing market. People were buying Homes not with the Idea of having a home to live in but because of Speculation. When the Bubble burst who’s fault was it? People’s own greed put them in a bad situation. But, Congress bailing out the Housing Industry not only cost the Tax payer Billions But actually has slowed the recovery of the Housing market by years if not decades.
My more immediate concern is whether 401K’s and other savings will be seized. Inflation is another way to Rob people.
I could cash it all out and pay the taxes (I am past the age to pay a Penalty) But then where would I put the money if Bank accounts are Not safe? Land and Hard Goods come to mind. Land certainly is not liquid But certain goods may be bartered.
Just my opinion and you know what they say about those.
All I know is I want Chris Christie to be the White House Press Secretary. I would like to see juan mccain appointed to secretary of something just so he could be fired. Ditto for huckabee.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.