Posted on 01/01/2002 8:22:44 PM PST by kattracks
LAMATH FALLS, Ore., Jan. 1 A security fence, video cameras and motion detectors have taken the place of the federal police guarding the head gates of the Klamath Reclamation Project irrigation system. The $90,000 security system was completed last week around the Klamath project, a United States Bureau of Reclamation site that became the center of protests last summer over federal restrictions on irrigation for farms. The limits were put in place to conserve water for threatened and endangered fish, a bureau spokesman, Dave Jones, said on Monday. The cutoff forced farmers with no other source of water to sell cattle, let pastures and hay fields go brown and forgo annual plantings of potatoes, grain and other crops. The federal police were brought in after irate farmers pried open the head gates to an irrigation canal four times and siphoned off water with a pump and a pipe. The bureau spent about $750,000 guarding the head gates from July 14 to Sept. 26, when the federal police left the site, after protesters agreed to scale back their activities in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. Security guards will remain through mid-January, when a final decision will be made on relying solely on the fence, cameras and motion detectors to protect the head gates, Mr. Jones said. Mr. Jones said water restrictions might not be necessary this year. "We are hoping for a very peaceful new year," he said. "The snowpack building up in the Siskiyous and the area there gives us every hope this will not be another contentious year, that we have enough water to meet both the environmental obligations we have as well as our longstanding relations with the farmers who depend on that water." Because of last winter's drought, there was not enough water to supply farmers after meeting Endangered Species Act requirements for the endangered suckerfish in Upper Klamath Lake, the project's primary reservoir, and the threatened coho salmon in Klamath River, which drains the region. More than 240,000 acres of ranches and farms rely on water from the federal irrigation project in the Klamath Basin in southern Oregon. A report from Oregon State University said the water dispute polarized the Klamath Basin and involved an undercurrent of racism against the Klamath Tribes, which consider the suckerfish to be sacred gifts from their creator.
Meanwhile the BOR gets new enforcement powers and pork for buying out the farmers.
No need for long johns this thing's going to get hot this month.
redrock--Constitutional Terrorist
Stop sign or security cam? I know what I'd pick.
Or can you actually help fellow Americans....in their quest for something that is theirs.
Or will you stand by your Republican President...even when he terrorizes Americans???
I'll be there sometime this year (seeing as how it's going)...will YOU???
Or is your devotion to the Constitution just words???
redrock--Constitutional Terrorist
He was stictching up GI's in Viet Nam and stood with us at Klamath Falls.
Headgates can be rendered moot if the bypass is completed.
I don't think that I will be responding to your posts any longer. I find your claim that I am only capable of bashing and smashing highly insulting, I have tried to give reasoned, and thought out responses.
"Or can you actually help fellow Americans....in their quest for something that is theirs."
Which fellow Americans? Those who fish, or those who farm?
"Or will you stand by your Republican President...even when he terrorizes Americans???"
Constitutional terrorist indeed redrock, by your complete disregard for it.
The Legislative Branch makes Laws, the Judicial Branch interprets them, and the Executive Branch enforces the Laws, as well as the decisions of the Courts.
Everything that has gone on in Klamath has been by Court order, after a sitution was brought to the Court system by a group of citizens.
Would you be supportive of a President who ignored the wishes of the Courts?"I'll be there sometime this year (seeing as how it's going)...will YOU???""Or is your devotion to the Constitution just words???
Oh, please...
But let me put it this way.....you have 1400 (approx) AMERICAN Families...husbands...wives...children.
Families dependent on the water from a lake and dam that either they,or their fathers, helped to create.
Created for one reason...to irrigate their land.
The Dam is NOT OWNED by the Federal Government......neither is the lake.
So...think about people like Castro...taking over private property .."for the good of the state".
I KNOW you would not approve of Castro doing it..(even WITH a Court Order)...so why approve of an American President doing it??
redrock
The lawsuit was brought to a Federal Court by US citizens. I am well-read on BOTH sides of this question. Spinning will not work with me here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.