Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Fat Zapper' Breaks Down Flab
BBC Online ^ | Monday, 19 November, 2001, 13:25 GMT | unattributed

Posted on 11/19/2001 6:41:37 AM PST by Ratatoskr

An easier alternative to liposuction could allow patients to go for treatments during the lunch hour, claim researchers.

The handheld ultrasound device pummels unsightly fat cells - without the need for the resulting liquid to be sucked out of the body using a thin tube inserted through the skin.

The conventional technique often needs to be performed under general anaesthetic, and requires a period of recuperation for patients.

Scientists at the Sheba Medical Centre in Tel Aviv, Israel, who have developed the device, say that their technique will cause far less "collateral damage" to blood vessels and other tissues such as skin and muscle.

It will, they say, also allow more accurate targeting of even relatively small areas of excess fat. However, their machine has so far only been tested on pigs.

It is well-known that ultrasound waves are able to break down fat cells, releasing the fat contained within them.

Some forms of liposuction already employ ultrasound probes to liquefy fat and make it easier to suck out.

However, the Israeli researchers found that, even when used externally, the broken down fatty liquid could simply be re-absorbed back into the bloodstream over the following few weeks.

They claim that there is no need for patients even to go on a diet for the technique to be effective.

Dr Ami Glickman told a newspaper: "It is going to be a totally non-invasive procedure - no operating room will be needed.

"You walk in, you get it, and you walk out."

While the inventors say that less fat could be removed in one session, the patient could return for further sessions much more quickly.

'Inherent safety'

Dr Yoram Eshel, another research on the project, told the newspaper: "The inherent safety of our method lies in the fact that we do half the traditional job compared to liposuction and let nature do the rest.

"Physiological clearance of the fat tissue occurs over a period of about three weeks following the procedure, similar to the way that the body clears out damaged tissue found in a bruise."


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Yay! Race you to the bacon and eggs!
1 posted on 11/19/2001 6:41:37 AM PST by Ratatoskr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ratatoskr
without the need for the resulting liquid to be sucked out of the body using a thin tube inserted through the skin.

Ack. So much for lunch.

2 posted on 11/19/2001 6:45:49 AM PST by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ratatoskr
"However, their machine has so far only been tested on pigs"
The writer misspelled Palestinians.
3 posted on 11/19/2001 6:45:53 AM PST by Moridin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ratatoskr
so far it has only been tested on pigs

test it on liberal's craniums.
4 posted on 11/19/2001 6:51:28 AM PST by mlocher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ratatoskr
However, their machine has so far only been tested on pigs

I was wondering why we haven't been seeing much of Jerry Nadler lately.

5 posted on 11/19/2001 6:56:41 AM PST by Clintons a commie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ratatoskr
Wouldn't a time lock on the refrigerator door work as well!!!!
6 posted on 11/19/2001 6:58:34 AM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ratatoskr
I would be very concerned with this newly liberated fat circulating in the bloodstream. I suppose the good doctors expect this fat to merely be excreted in the urine? Or maybe it would be redeposited somewhere else.. another part of the body, or maybe the arteries, leading to coronary heart disease... I have to see more info on this technique..
7 posted on 11/19/2001 7:00:25 AM PST by Paradox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ratatoskr
Now, how deep does this go? Body organs are surrounded with fat, it is what takes up the room in your body between muscle and bone and organs. Will this just get the stuff on the outside of the muscle or inside near the organs?

Either way, Where can I sign up to be one of the guinea pigs??

8 posted on 11/19/2001 7:06:15 AM PST by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ratatoskr
Be aware however you would have the same problem as with liposuction, you remove the fat from one place you tend to gain it back somewere else.
9 posted on 11/19/2001 7:13:59 AM PST by tophat9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
I would be very concerned with this newly liberated fat circulating in the bloodstream.

I know. It doesn't sound good, does it? There was more detail in the paper version of the article, though, which said that sessions are limited to a pound of fat at a time. Since fat is fluffy, a pint of the stuff carefully targetted would be cosmetically significant without (maybe) being medically dangerous.

By the time the FDA approves it, I'll probably be losing weight the old fashioned way: by decomposing.

10 posted on 11/19/2001 7:25:09 AM PST by Ratatoskr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ratatoskr
Actually, research I have read shows that this type of system can work only if the patient has enough additional activity over the subsequent days to burn the extra calories.

You may recall the development of creams which were touted as a way to eliminate cellulite. While researchers have said they don't work, there is enough anecdotal evidence among certain groups to indicate that they do. Specifically, body builders have used the creams to increase definition in areas where they have pockets of fat. They have found, however, that they need to either reduce calories or increase activity (and hence metabolism) by an amount equal to what re-enters the blood stream.

Failure to take the extra steps results in the fat being redeposited, usually right back where it came from.

11 posted on 11/19/2001 7:46:45 AM PST by sharktrager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson