Posted on 11/07/2001 10:28:57 PM PST by MadIvan
In his eight years as Mayor of New York, Mayor Rudolph Giuliani made his city a safer place to live, a more attractive place to visit, a more fiscally responsible city and a better place to conduct business in. Today all these achievements are at risk and Mr Guiliani himself is about to stand down. It is a grave and important moment in the history of one of the worlds greatest cities.
The race to replace a Mayor who had been such a dominant figure in the city was always destined to be unusual. New York is, in theory, a staunchly Democratic place where Republican contenders should have no chance of obtaining high office. But it is also a social and political melting pot when ethnic identity and personality politics can play as large a part as party affiliation. This was proved again in this election.
The billionaire Michael Bloomberg spent a vast fortune on his victorious battle to succeed Mr Giuliani. He has bought himself a heap of trouble. Even before September 11 the citys economy was slowing down but now it has fallen back badly. Tourists are staying away, fearing further attacks. The explosion at the twin towers also blew a huge hole in the citys budget, perhaps as much as $2 billion, as tax revenues slumped.
Even in a city which likes to elect colourful characters as Mayor, Mr Bloomberg was initially considered rather too colourful. Others thought, indeed still think, that he is both naive about politics and very conventional in his thinking. For this reason Mr Bloomberg trailed his opponent badly for a long time. One thing turned the tables before election day and it was not the Bloomberg fortune. It was an endorsement from Mr Giuliani. What voters really wanted was another term for their current Mayor. Since election law forbade this, they turned to the next best thing, the man Mr Giuliani endorsed. Mr Bloomberg should now give voters what they want. He should envisage his first term as Mr Giulianis third term.
He should begin, as his predecessor would have done, with a confident drive to rebuild his city. New York lost 18 million square feet of office space in the terrorist attack. If it is not to face a serious crisis in two or three years time it needs to start now replacing that lost space. It will take at least a year simply to clear the rubble and rebuild the infrastructure at the World Trade Centre site. So steps will have to be taken to speed up work elsewhere. The highly respected Manhattan Institute, Mr Giulianis favourite think tank, proposes a radical reform of the Citys restrictive planning laws and rezoning areas, such as Manhattans Far West Side, which currently only allow small buildings.
With a looming deficit problem, Mr Bloomberg might be tempted to increase taxes. Mr Giuliani, one suspects, would tackle things differently. His cuts in hotel taxes raised revenues, from $110 million in 1992 to $235 million. A further cut in hotel tax and in real estate taxes could benefit the city budget, relieve the tourism drought and stimulate the economy.
Any budget gap that remains might be filled by pruning New York spending. Here again the new Mayor can benefit from his predecessors example. Mayor Giuliani inherited a $2.3 billion budget gap and began to fill it by negotiating hundreds of millions of dollars of concessions from the municipal workforce. Mayor Bloomberg should do the same, perhaps beginning with teachers, who are currently working without a contract.
Mr Bloomberg was once quoted as saying: Adulation is great. Now he has to go out and earn it.
If New Yorkers want to show their gratitude to the man who saved their city from becoming North America's Calcutta, they could do the same for him as they did for "Fiorello" La Guardia, and give the airport formerly called Idlewild the name of a noble and decent man.
Bloomberg needs to walk in Mayor Rudy's footsteps, not merely follow them. I have my doubts, but Green would have been a disaster.
People like Giuliani are going to be remembered with statues - Bloomberg can best spend his time just continuing in this vein.
Thought occurs: Perhaps "sir Rudy" could have set the next four year's Tone, as it were, by meeting the commercial customers on BA's Concorde -- whilst deputising Bloomberg to meet Blair?
<p.
Guiliani is one of those rare gems, he's not always saying the popular thing, but you know he has convictions and where he stands no matter what.
Besides the "personal touch" (not clinton's version) Guiliani employs to every situation, good or bad....I think people can sense his honesty. He's a 'real' person, and if he doesn't KNOW something, he says so and says he'll find out.
People can understand that...It's real.
Unfortunately for Bloomburg, and anyone who fills Guiliani's shoes - alot of Rudy's appeal is his personality too. From what I've seen of Mike Bloomburg - he's a bit dry (but not in that funny British way) ;)
And anyone who has issues with Bloomburg's version of GOP or thinks a "real" REPUBLICAN could ever win in NYC - well, forget that. The NYC version of GOP is the only thing that could ever be elected there.
It best to recognize that fact, and appreciate that the more conservative and fiscally sound guy won plus RUDY liked him!
There's a lesson in there...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.