Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our Government is Worse Than Anthrax
LewRockwell.com ^ | October 18, 2001 | Steven Greenhut

Posted on 10/18/2001 5:18:58 AM PDT by sendtoscott

Our Government is Worse Than Anthrax

by Steven Greenhut

I’ve already been accused by some of my newspaper readers of being a coward and a traitor because I can’t get too excited about the Endless War on Terrorism. So I might as well go for the gusto and say what I really think.

First, despite the truly grievous attacks on innocent people in New York, Washington, and Pennsylvania, I still fear my own government far more than I fear Osama bin Laden, his al-Qaida network, and whatever foreign governments may have aided and abetted his terrorist plots. In my mind, the FBI is far more frightening than anthrax, and John Ashcroft isn’t much better than the Ebola virus.

Second, while America’s foreign policy – i.e., starving Iraqi children for 11 years because Washington no longer supports the dictator it helped prop up – doesn’t condone terrorism, it explains why some people are supportive of it.

Third, Americans have more to fear from the ideas expressed in a recent neoconservative tirade in The Weekly Standard than they do from the frothing U.S. flag-burners in Pakistan. Last week’s cover story, written by Max Boot of the Wall Street Journal, was titled, The Case for American Empire, and is something well beyond satire. Read it yourself for final proof that the neocons are insane.

Fourth, if I have to hear one more commentator prattle about America being targeted by bin Laden because of our nation’s freedoms, I am going to run into the streets of Santa Ana (where I work) yelling nasty things about our government. Don’t worry, no one will bother me given that English isn’t widely spoken around these parts.

As part of my quiet protest against the jingoism and war-mongering, most of my columns since the Sept. 11 attacks are dedicated to this proposition: America ain’t nearly as free as everyone seems to think it is.

On Sunday, I wrote about how the local children’s services agency has taken a young girl out of the care of her loving grandmother and placed her with a foster parent who, according to court records, owed $31,000 in back child support to his own kids, had a restraining order placed on him so he couldn’t see them, and was accused in a sworn statement of swimming nude with his foster children.

I was reminded that government bureaucrats can take anyone’s kids at any time for any reason, and they needn’t even tell the parent where the kid has been placed for 72 hours. Proceedings take place in a special kangaroo court where what the bureaucrats say is taken for gospel, and what parents and responsible adults say often is ignored. After my column ran, I’ve been inundated with calls from readers relaying similar tragic dealings with these agencies.

A couple of weeks ago, I wrote about eminent domain abuses. In California, most cities have what are called redevelopment agencies, whose officials can declare any residential or retail area as blighted, and then exert broad powers of eminent domain to take properties from owners and hand them over to big developers. The real goal isn’t blight removal, but the creation of new shopping centers and hotel complexes that bring in more tax revenues than the current residents or business owners bring in.

Cities are supposed to pay fair-market value for the properties they take, but they try to outright steal them by making lowball offers, backed by intimidating tactics worthy of the mafia. I wrote about how the city of Garden Grove took a thriving multimillion-dollar car rental business run by Korean immigrants, and offered them the whopping sum of $16,000 for the enterprise. Small entrepreneurs are routinely forced out of business by the government, and deprived of their livelihoods – making it difficult to find the resources needed to fight back in court. These aren’t anomalies, but everyday occurrences in California and other states.

In another column, I wrote about Catholic school boosters who raised funds and started building a privately funded school on one of the few sites zoned specifically for schools in San Juan Capistrano. Although the local public school district can legally build on most any piece of property zoned in most any way, the public school officials didn’t like the idea of competition. So once they saw the private school effort, they decided to try to use eminent domain to take the site for their own school.

These are just a handful of stories from one small, albeit rather loony, corner of America over the last few weeks. After each article was published, I received calls from other people telling about even more egregious incidents of government abuse. These include developers who have the total value of their property stolen from them after officials discover some endangered bug on the land, property owners who are forced to make their homes conform to bogus historical standards, a city that is forcing some privately owned motels to shut down because they cater to poor long-term residents rather than tourists, and lots and lots of unfair takings examples. Sometimes people are protected in the courts, but only after years of fighting.

We live in a land where the government taxes more than half your income, where officials can take your children or your property on a whim and leave you little recourse, where government agencies have complete power over what you can do on your own private property and when you can do it. Yet we’re supposed to be so proud of our free country that we go around the world liberating other people with our Tomahawk missiles. God bless America, my eye. God save it, is more like it.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-317 next last

1 posted on 10/18/2001 5:18:58 AM PDT by sendtoscott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sendtoscott
Second, while America’s foreign policy – i.e., starving Iraqi children for 11 years because Washington no longer supports the dictator it helped prop up – doesn’t condone terrorism, it explains why some people are supportive of it.

You know, as a "l" libertarian, this has always puzzled me about "L" Libertarians. I cannot fathom why they are clinging to this starving the children schtick when they are the first ones to step up to the plate and argue for just leaving other countries to fend for themselves. Now we are to blame for withholding food? Whatever happened to non-interventionism?

2 posted on 10/18/2001 5:22:48 AM PDT by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sendtoscott
Since I had this quote on my clipboard, I will add it to your post. It's from "Brave New World" by A. Huxley.

People still went on talking about truth and beauty as though they were the sovereign goods. Right up to the time of the Nine Years' War. That made them change their tune all right. What's the point of truth or beauty or knowledge when the anthrax bombs are popping all around you? That was when science first began to be controlled–after the Nine Years' War. People were ready to have even their appetites controlled then. Anything for a quiet life. We've gone on controlling ever since. It hasn't been very good for truth, of course. But it's been very good for happiness. One can't have something for nothing. Happiness has got to be paid for.

All too true, we can see the sheeple lining up for slaughter.

3 posted on 10/18/2001 5:23:31 AM PDT by Brad C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
Now we are to blame for withholding food?

Enforcing an embargo is doing far more than just ignoring them. "Withholding X" qualifies as just ignoring them.
4 posted on 10/18/2001 5:24:29 AM PDT by sendtoscott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sendtoscott
This problem is this guy lives in the communist controlled part of the United States - California. He doesn't realize every place isn't as bad as "occupied" California.
5 posted on 10/18/2001 5:25:29 AM PDT by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
I don't think Lew and his crowd are "l"ibertarians or "L"ibertarians. Granted, they self-identify as "l"ibertarians, but they're mainly anti-"S"emites, if I recall correctly.
6 posted on 10/18/2001 5:27:04 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sendtoscott
Do you honestly believe that the Iraqi government has not had it within their power to feed its citizens?
7 posted on 10/18/2001 5:28:12 AM PDT by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sendtoscott
TO THE AUTHOR: Some people would only be happy with a world they themselves would create. Unfortunately, some others wouldn't happy with THAT vision.

We're the best option out there, BUB, and you know what? There's actually a system in place right now that allows a dedicated person with opposing views to get things changed more to their liking. Sounds like you've not going to have a lot of spare time on your hands.

By the way - when the country is at war, it's not real smart to sound like you're trying to the undermine confidence in our basic principles, which are admired worldwide by most educated, non-cave dwelling persons.

8 posted on 10/18/2001 5:29:33 AM PDT by bond7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: sendtoscott
Our Government IS a Terrorist Organization, Period.
It has turned into exactly what the Founding Fathers said it would.
10 posted on 10/18/2001 5:31:49 AM PDT by Fighting Falcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M1991
I never said I didn't hold a healthy dose of fear for the government. I know what they are capable of. However, I am also having a real hard time screwing up any sympathy for the Iraqis.
11 posted on 10/18/2001 5:32:49 AM PDT by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: M1991
"The sanctions hurt the Iraqui people but hurt Sadam not at all."

Well, maybe, eventually, the Iraqi people will decide to take out their anger and despair on the real culprits in the case ... Saddam Hussein and the rest of his regime.

If not, well, then they don't want it enough.

12 posted on 10/18/2001 5:41:29 AM PDT by BlueLancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fighting Falcons

Fanatic Islam or Fanatic Statism

There is no difference between US federal and state governments that operate outside of their constitutions and an Islamic court.  That is, relative to covenant government established by Israel's God.  All other gods operate deadly tyrannies.

Enrage the globalists.  Join the IDF!

13 posted on 10/18/2001 5:41:53 AM PDT by Israel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bond7
By the way - when the country is at war...

You wanna post congresses declaration of War? I have not seen it as of yet so maybe you can back up that statement. Knuckle Draggers indeed.

14 posted on 10/18/2001 5:42:00 AM PDT by Fighting Falcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bond7
Hey Bub: I guess your not a land owner or don't have children or have not been audited. I don't hold great hope four our country.

Just yesterday I asked an employee of the Economic Security Department "have you heard of the Workforce Investment Act? His he answered “yes” with a shocked look. I asked “what is the difference between The Workforce Investment Act and Nazi Germany?

He looked straight in the eyes and said "NOTHING, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING". He asked “how do you know about this law”?. I said “I pay attention to alternate news sources, regular media will never report the real story on this issue”.

People don't comprehend the magnitude of the Workforce Investment Act until it is explained like this.

Your Child’s future from the Cradle to The Grave is being Decided by Hillary's' Human Resources Development Plan for the United States. Is that ok with you?

It goes like this.

We need more dish washers. Set the curriculum up for more dish washers.

Please Please investigate this hidden Act. It will destroy America, free enterprise and our children’s future.

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=16284
15 posted on 10/18/2001 5:45:13 AM PDT by schmalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bond7
when the country is at war, it's not real smart to sound like you're trying to the undermine confidence in our basic principles

Since when has taking a citizen's children or their property been a basic principle of this country?
16 posted on 10/18/2001 5:45:25 AM PDT by sendtoscott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer
Well, maybe, eventually, the Iraqi people will decide to take out their anger and despair on the real culprits in the case ... Saddam Hussein and the rest of his regime.

If not, well, then they don't want it enough.


Don't terrorists target civilians to try to scare them into changing what their government is doing?
17 posted on 10/18/2001 5:47:05 AM PDT by sendtoscott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Fighting Falcons
You wanna post congresses declaration of War? I have not seen it as of yet so maybe you can back up that statement.

So do you need a formal piece of paper to know we are at war, or is the rubble at the WTC, the 6,000 people dead, the bombs falling in Afghanistan, and the anthrax going to do it for ya'?

By the way, the President has filed the apropriate papers formally notifying Congress of military action, as required by law.

18 posted on 10/18/2001 5:47:23 AM PDT by bond7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sendtoscott
"Don't terrorists target civilians to try to scare them into changing what their government is doing?"

That may be true, except we ARE targeting the government .. ie, the nation-state of Iraq.

If the government chooses to pass the suffering along to its own people, that's an internal problem.

19 posted on 10/18/2001 5:49:31 AM PDT by BlueLancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sendtoscott
Since when has taking a citizen's children or their property been a basic principle of this country?

Our Government is Worse Than Anthrax is the title of the article.

Gee, I think that is an attack on our basic prinicles, don't you??

20 posted on 10/18/2001 5:50:48 AM PDT by bond7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-317 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson