Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BAE F-35 Jet Fighter Avionics Early And Under Budget
Nashua Broadcaster ^ | September 02, 2004 | Nashua Broadcaster

Posted on 09/02/2004 4:08:46 PM PDT by red flanker

Article Published: Thursday, September 02, 2004 - 10:49:59 AM EST

BAE delivers system for F-35 jet fighter early and under budget

NASHUA BAE Systems executives are celebrating what they describe as an early delivery of a lightweight, electronic warfare suite to Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co., for development of the next-generation F-35 Joint Strike fighter, a multirole, supersonic, stealth aircraft.

The electronic warfare suite, provided by BAE Systems' Information & Electronic Warfare Systems, will serve as the nerve center for F-35 pilots, enhancing their situational awareness and self-protection through next generation threat identification, monitoring, analysis and countermeasures.

Special guests at last week's press conference to announce BAE's Lockheed delivery included U.S. Rep. Duncan Hunter, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, and both New Hampshire congressmen, Charlie Bass and Jeb Bradley.

"It's truly an honor to represent employees in this district that have delivered a product on time, under cost and underweight to such an important project," said Bass.

Added Bradley, "The company's slogan, We Protect Those Who Protect Us, is perfectly embodied by the JSF Team and their accomplishments."

During the system development and demonstration phase, BAE Systems has reduced the overall cost of the electronic warfare suite by $3 billion and reduced the weight by 60 pounds per aircraft, according to Dan Gobel, BAE Systems JSF electronic suite program director.

"This is a key systems integration milestone for the Joint Strike Fighter Program," said Tom Burbage, Lockheed Martin executive vice president and general manager for F-35 Program Integration, during a ribbon-cutting ceremony before 300 JSF team members at BAE Systems' Canal Street facility in Nashua.

The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is being developed for the U.S. Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps, as well as for the United Kingdom's Royal Air Force and Royal Navy, to replace the A-10, the Harrier, the F-16 and the F/A-18 Hornet.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: f35; jsf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Just in time for CIC Bush and wingman "Big Time" Cheney to deliver the goods.

Reaction of Kerry and advisor to latest ads, news, and polls

1 posted on 09/02/2004 4:08:48 PM PDT by red flanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: red flanker

Being a Project Engineer... I am impressed


2 posted on 09/02/2004 4:11:54 PM PDT by Mikey_1962
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: red flanker

Can it fire spitballs?


3 posted on 09/02/2004 4:11:57 PM PDT by Boss_Jim_Gettys (Bush/Cheney, the Official Candidates of the 2004 Olympic Summer Games)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: red flanker
The electronic warfare suite, provided by BAE Systems' Information & Electronic Warfare Systems, will serve as the nerve center for F-35 pilots, enhancing their situational awareness and self-protection through next generation threat identification, monitoring, analysis and countermeasures.

Unless Kerry is elected and cancels it.

So9

4 posted on 09/02/2004 4:20:46 PM PDT by Servant of the 9 (Screwing the Inscrutable or is it Scruting the Inscrewable?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: red flanker
Good news so far. Now we'll see how it fares in the budget battles to come. That'll be it's next combat theater of operations.

PS...Nice pic, but that's the Boeing entry, not Lockheed's.

5 posted on 09/02/2004 4:37:22 PM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boss_Jim_Gettys
Can it fire spitballs?

All a Kerry administration could do was authorize spit. Ya know he doesn't have any balls.

6 posted on 09/02/2004 4:52:02 PM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GBA
Sorry, but that is not the Boeing entry, which had a delta-wing configuration. It matters not, because the sucker will be canceled next year regardless of who is President.
7 posted on 09/02/2004 4:53:49 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GBA

very astute obversation, boeing hasnt made a good fighter since the P26....LOL


8 posted on 09/02/2004 5:21:32 PM PDT by aspiring.hillbilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aspiring.hillbilly
very astute obversation, boeing hasnt made a good fighter since the P26....LOL

Ummm i think the F-15 Eagle is a pretty damn good aircraft...

Boeing F-15

9 posted on 09/02/2004 5:39:46 PM PDT by FesterUSMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: red flanker

I bet their was a sizable bonus for getting the job done early and under budget.


10 posted on 09/02/2004 5:40:43 PM PDT by TheBattman (http://www.swiftvets.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: red flanker
"...electronic warfare suite.."

I love that name. I wonder if they have a "Deluxe warfare suite".

11 posted on 09/02/2004 5:43:33 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
to replace the A-10, the Harrier, the F-16 and the F/A-18 Hornet.

It has a tailhook, VTOL capability, close air-support, ground attack, surface attack, air-to-air and tanker capabilities? Why am I skeptical?

Where is the other engine? The A-7 was the only naval aircraft I ever worked on that had a single engine.

12 posted on 09/02/2004 5:52:07 PM PDT by SC Swamp Fox (Aim small, miss small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Sorry, but that is not the Boeing entry, which had a delta-wing configuration.

Sorry, but that photo is of the Boeing Joint Strike Fighter, though it might not be the final design.

You can see it at;
www.boeing.com/news/releases/1999/photorelease/photo_release_990204n1.htm

It matters not, because the sucker will be canceled next year regardless of who is President.

What makes you think it will be canceled?
If anything the F-22 Raptor will canceled or delayed and the much less expensive Joint Strike Fighter moved to the front.

13 posted on 09/02/2004 5:53:59 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SC Swamp Fox
Lots of good single-engine Navy Fighters, but the F-35 wont be one of them. The rule of thumb, is single-engine/single mission. Multi-role aircraft need a place to keep that extra gas beyond what they can sling in tanks. It doesn't matter, because the F-35 is so overweight, it has NO chance, I repeat, NO CHANCE of going into production. It cannot perform a single role from it's design specs.
14 posted on 09/02/2004 5:56:59 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
1999? Whatever. The F-22 is locked in. It is funded. The F-35 is a dead duck.
15 posted on 09/02/2004 5:59:03 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FesterUSMC
Ummm i think the F-15 Eagle is a pretty damn good aircraft...

The F-15 was not a Boeing design. They just bought the company which made them. (McDonnell Douglas). http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=101

16 posted on 09/02/2004 6:02:23 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FesterUSMC

F-15

The only reason it's a Boeing is that Boeing bought McDonnell-Douglas.

17 posted on 09/02/2004 6:02:26 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FesterUSMC
Ummm i think the F-15 Eagle is a pretty damn good aircraft...

Ummmmm.... as I understand it, the Indian Air Force, flying Russina fighters, beat the F-15s rahter soundly in recent war games.

The F-15 was a state of the art 1960s design, but has been out dated by other air forces. We need the JSF and F22 both. But they will be the last "airplanes" as we know them. The next air breather air superiority craft after JSF and F22 will be UCAVs. Now, trans-atmospheric flight? I think I know some "scarf and goggles" types who might just climb into one of those. Imagine coming in for a run at, oh, Mach 6.

18 posted on 09/02/2004 6:04:04 PM PDT by Phsstpok (often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
Ummmmm.... as I understand it, the Indian Air Force, flying Russina fighters, beat the F-15s rahter soundly in recent war games.

Until the recent Defense spending was passed, you could have gone out and beaten an F-15 with a stick, and the Air Force would have told the world all about it.

Don't think for a second that any two Indians flying MiGs can handle a single American-trained pilot in any modern fighter.

19 posted on 09/02/2004 6:08:45 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
if you look at that report, you will see that "war game" was NOT far and the F-15 was out numbered sometimes 3-1 and the F-15 DID NOT have its normal sophisticated radar, while the Sukoi did... Lets have a 1 on 1 fair match up and the F-15 will will win 99% of the time!
20 posted on 09/02/2004 6:10:13 PM PDT by FesterUSMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson