[Morgana]

What the?

[SoConPubbie]

What the?

Kind of like all the clergy in the Catholic Church who are agitating for accepting both Homosexuality as Normal and Homosexuals as Priests, right Morgana?

[hinckley buzzard]

I suspect they got taken over by liberals.

[steve8714]

Well, it’s Austin.

[Worldtraveler once upon a time]

Reading the article a little more closely, these two “Anglican” were not so much “Anglican” as “affiliated with” for different reasons, and decided to come out of their “non-theological closet” and into the drag queen light of darkness.

Reading between the lines, the sense is that they were trying to have it both ways, but — in a similar manner — having it both ways sexually doesn't mean that bisexual is sometimes heterosexual and sometimes homosexual. It means that individual (or church) is bisexual supporting, and any clear view tells that this stance is, by itself, support for the promiscuous, period.

These churches have replaced a Christian's Roman 1 with "love (but I really mean sex) is love (but I really mean sex)."

[Bookshelf]

Hey Morgana, to paraphrase what you have entered in your FR home site: “I realize I don’t need certain people [you] and the bullshit they [you] bring.”