Posted on 11/20/2022 11:33:37 AM PST by SeekAndFind
"We’ve all heard of people being cancelled, thrown off social media, even fired from jobs … But how many years before a Christian minister [who speaks] on marriage and sexual orientation is reported [to] a government anti-terrorism program?"
For Reverend Dr. Bernard Randall, that time has already come. The chaplain of a Church of England School was suspended, fired for gross misconduct, and reported to child protective services simply for restating what the Church of England believes. If his story sounds like a distant outlier, it’s not. Randall’s nightmare will be every Christian’s nightmare if our Senate passes the Respect for Marriage Act.
"I was doing my job as per the job description," Randall told a roomful of religious liberty advocates this July. Yet for being a Christian in a Christian school, he was painted "as a potential violent extremist [who] might draw others into violent extremism." This, despite the U.K. Human Rights Act that declares, "Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion" (Article 9, 1998).
How long is it going to take for this to happen in the United States, he asked? "Is it under Biden? Is it under a second term of Biden-Harris?"
If congressional Democrats get their way, it happens now. Today, the U.S. Senate is voting on a bill that supporters are insisting is just an affirmation of the same-sex marriage status quo. As Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) tells it, his party simply wants to cement Obergefell’s 2015 redefinition of marriage into federal law.
If only that were the case. Not only is this language light years more radical than the justices’ ruling seven years ago — cracking down on parents, charities, adoption agencies, teachers, Christian schools, counselors, and Bible-believing professionals — the government would be declaring open season on anyone who believes in marriage as it’s always been: the union of a man and woman.
As a former commissioner and chairman of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), I’ve seen the warning signs of this gathering like clouds across the Atlantic. As the mainstream culture moves further and further away from a Christian worldview, I’ve witnessed the hostility to moral truth creep closer to our shores. The West, once the safe haven of free speech and religion, is turning cold to the foundations that made our countries thrive. In a report released this July, FRC tracked 99 incidents of government attacks on religious freedom against Christians or Christian institutions across 14 Western countries in the last two years alone.
What will it say in two more if Americans are considered fair game by the Justice Department for their views on natural marriage? Under this bill, they are sitting ducks — prime targets for government investigation, prosecution, even civil action. H.R. 8404 is a stick of dynamite that, in the hands of the Left, would supercharge the attacks, the marginalization, and the oppression of people of faith and anyone who believes in marriage as human history defines it.
Reverend Randall came to Washington, D.C. to warn America that this was possible. "My story sends a message to other Christians that you are not free to talk about your faith," he cautioned. "It seems it is no longer enough to just 'tolerate' LBGT ideology. You must accept it without question and no debate is allowed without serious consequences."
Of course, Senate Democrats insist the threat to religious freedom that held up the bill this summer have been fixed. That "fix," which is a few flimsy sentences clarifying that institutions won’t be forced to perform actual wedding ceremonies, does nothing to resolve the hammer this legislation takes to everyday people. It doesn’t protect the worker who doesn’t want to be coerced to celebrate LGBT Pride Month. It’s not going to protect the parent who says, "I don’t want my children indoctrinated with this abominable curriculum." If anything, the misnamed Respect for Marriage Act will accelerate the persecution that we’ve seen in the last seven years to a level no one ever dreamed.
Päivi Räsänen learned the hard way that religious freedom laws are virtually worthless in the face of the secular mobs. The Finnish Parliament member could still be sent to jail for daring to tweet a Bible verse about sexuality in a country whose constitution states, "Everyone has the freedom of religion and conscience." Like America, Finland is a European liberal democracy that ostensibly promises its citizens basic human rights such as freedom of speech, religion, assembly, equality under the law, and property rights, among others. But, as Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) and I cautioned, the Finnish government seems to have forgotten these core values.
How long until American lawmakers are similarly prosecuted?
My years of international advocacy include a powerful defense of the United Nation's Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which affirms the ability "to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practices, worship and observance." And yet, if that declaration passed unanimously, and 192 countries now recognize the exercise of religious freedom as a fundamental human right, why was a commission created to track the abuses of religious liberty? Because many governments give mere lip service to this fundamental freedom.
Case in point: few would see Turkey as an enemy of freedom until Pastor Andrew Brunson — who I escorted back to the U.S. in my role at USCIRF — was imprisoned for more than two years. In Turkey, as in Finland, the U.K., and U.S., the constitution is clear: "Everyone has the freedom of conscience, religious belief, and conviction."
My experience at USCIRF and around the world, for which I am immensely grateful, has shown me that religious freedom's greatest threat is not a military force that eradicates or suppresses religious freedom, although that has certainly occurred. The greatest threat are policies like the so-called Respect for Marriage Act being considered by the United States Senate. They are what curtails the exercise of religious freedom — which leads not to a violent overthrow of this fundamental freedom, but to its systematic suppression and eventual loss.
America must understand: we cannot promote abroad what we will not protect at home. Including freedom.
Originally published at The Washington Stand.
Tony Perkins is president of the Family Research Council.
lets be real...you WILL bake a cake will be the law of the land
That’s what those Republicans voted for.
I would never eat anything that I had forced somebody to cook for me.
Not that we aren’t persecuted already.
This guy has been claiming that Christians were going to be put in ovens in a matter of weeks for years and years. He’s just a grifter who makes millions of dollars a year scaring Christians.
This bill changes nothing about the current state of affairs and he knows it. Nothing more than symbolic vote. Notice Trump didn’t say anything about it.
The public and Republican voters want gay marriage and so as many churches have realized, it’s better to set it up in a way that protects congregations via the law than rely on activist judges. Anyone pretending there’s going to be some sort of backlash on this issue is a liar. It didn’t happen on abortion and will not on this one.
Follow the money!!!
Should this pass, churches that are against same sex marriage could lose their tax esemption.
And on the back of the Q Club shooting, churches will be accused of promoting hate filled domestic terrorism.
In the proposed law there is no protection for individuals who are not acting in the capacity of an employee of protected institutions. So the florist, the baker, the Tshirt maker, the public school teacher who don’t affirm same-sex marriage have no protection from prosecution.
I am not sure if state law with broader conscience protections would be nullified if this passes.
Will it be against the law to quote from the Bible?
How many Republican’s in the Senate voted for it because they’re all for it or because they didn’t even read it, just heard that it protected homosexuals and they want to win some points with that crowd.
I wonder how many of them pretend to go to church or profess their faith come election time.
Yep, eleven pubbies put the bill out of reach of a filibuster and made this outrage the law of the land.
Yet I’m constantly told by Freepers that an Article V COS is too dangerous to consider.
Of course it won’t. And liars have been saying that as well for decades. I remember it in the 80s people saying it was going to be illegal to be a Christian by the end of the year.
Garbage liars fleecing the flock.
Gay marriage law was the last nail in the coffin of America.
The marxist democrats and godless rinos only seem to take on Christians. Why not Islam?
Wrong.
Nope. The vote was for cloture to allow debate on the underlying bill, which has not yet passed.
Without those 12 Republicans (they only needed 10) this bill would have been dead in the water. But it is advancing to likely passage given the approval of the RINOs.
There is still time to exert public pressure, as the actual vote on the bill itself has not happened yet. They thought they could sneak this through during the lame duck session – but we found out about it.
The best we can do is to make this vote extremely unpleasant for these pukes.
They’ve been using that language for decades. They claimed that the Obergefell ruling was going to put pastors in jail as well. It never happened.
These establishment grifters were all trying to sell Republicans on anti-MAGA people like Ted Cruz by using false scares, no different than the doctors that tell you to wear a mask 24/7.
“Heritage” employs Mike Pence:
https://www.heritage.org/staff/mike-pence
That tells you everything you need to know about their honesty and forthrightness. It’s a sabotage group designed to subvert actual conservatism.
“You Will” doesn’t sound like freedom to me. It only revokes one man’s freedom so the other can have his supposed freedom so another can do as he likes,including revoking the freedom of the first man.
Never trust people who pretend to “give” you rights which you already possess. They’re just reminding you that these rights can be taken away on a whim.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.