LOL. I know, I was just trying to push another response out of you, but levity is good.
Anyway, reversing things, the picture I saw in the reference section finally sunk in. It could not have been Masoretic Text -— nor Aramaic Hebrew before it, nor Paleo Hebrew before that used to etch the second set.
So here I am...
Here’s hoping some on here can narrow it down before Paleo Hebrew.
Aramaic was not a written language as I understand it. That’s why the NT or at least large or it was not written in aramaic
I am way out of my league with this conversation.
In fact I am going to poke around google just to catch up to the languages/texts you mention.
I do not even know which of these is a spoken language or written language or both.
(Sunday school marm) “King James English! It was good enough for Jesus, so it must’ve been good enough for Moses.” /Humor-off