VIGANÒ WRITES ON THE VATICAN II. WE ARE AT THE REDDE RATIONEM.

Stilum Curiae ^ | June 9, 2020 | Marco Tosatti

[Marchmain]

of course, I never said otherwise.

[ebb tide]

Now if he would put his words into action.

Now what could he do, that you or I can't do?

What "action" have you taken, besides just "words"?

[piusv]

Last I looked, he’s part of the NO hierarchy, no? He can’t come out of hiding, proclaim Bergoglio a false pope, and encourage the rest of the hierarchy to do the same? You don’t think he can do more than you or I? And if he can’t do more than what you and I can do, then why care what he says in the first place?

[nanetteclaret]

Sorry I’m late getting back to you. I don’t know the answers to your questions, since I can’t read his mind. I don’t know if his writings indicate his stance, either. I’m just speaking for myself and what I’ve learned from research.

[blackpacific]

1. Proclaiming Bergolio a false Pope would be a stupid act because Pope Francis IS the pope. That is why we are in such a bad state of affairs, the freemasons have their guy on the throne of Peter.
2.Vigano is a successor of the Apostles and is acting like one. He is guiding the flock.
3. He is telling us it is ok to disobey legitimate authority when that authority commands us to do something that violates our fidelity to Christ. For example, when a local bishop mandates communion in the hand we should not obey, ever.
4. He is cutting through the fog that has been laid down by evil people to deceive if possible, even the elect.

When I read his writings, which get better each time he teaches, my heart is jumping for joy. Yours should be too.

[edwinland]

Thanks. That’s pretty much what I thought. His writing is not actually clear. He says things that indicate a mix of positions.

[blackpacific]

Maybe you should list all of his extreme views?

And also, maybe you should explain why having an “extreme view” is wrong/bad other than argument by assertion?