Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Would St. Paul be politically active if he was an American citizen today?
Christian Post ^ | Michael Brown

Posted on 09/12/2019 8:14:41 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Are American Christians too politicized? Or are we not politically minded enough? And what about Christian leaders in America? Are they (we) too outspoken politically? Or perhaps not enough?

I decided to come at this from another angle, asking this question on Twitter: “What's your opinion? If Paul was alive today and a USA citizen, how political would he be?”

Since Twitter allows four possible responses to a poll, and since there are constraints as to how many characters can be used for each response, I offered these options, with the responses placed here in parentheses:

So, almost two-thirds (64 percent, to be exact) felt that Paul would either not vote at all or else be secretive in his vote. And just 14 percent could see Paul endorsing a candidate. Very interesting!

Obviously, in the minds of those who responded to this poll, Paul was not seen through a political lens, even though he appealed to his Roman citizenship at times in Acts, and even though he spoke directly to the Jewish leadership and other Roman leadership.

Still, in the minds of the majority of the responders, Paul was more spiritual than political. Or, at the least, he would not want his political views to be a focal point.

Interestingly, in polling I’ve done over the years, it’s clear that a large majority of congregants want their pastors to address controversial moral and cultural issues. In fact, when I have shown the video titled, “Why Don’t More Pastors Speak Out?”, the public response is overwhelmingly positive. It’s as if a corporate “Yes” erupts from the crowd as they express their agreement and affirmation.

But it would appear that people make a distinction between a minister addressing cultural issues and a minister voting for (or, even more so, endorsing) a candidate. This was confirmed when I tweeted the question, “If Paul was alive today and a USA citizen, would he take a public stance on abortion?”

The landslide answer was that he would be openly pro-life. Very, very few thought he would be “pro-choice” (not my favorite way of putting it, but simply used for simplicity). Even less thought he would keep his views private. (The poll results were not final as of this writing.)

So, why the strong disparity between Paul taking a public stance against abortion vs. Paul being outspoken for a political candidate?

It would appear that, when it comes to addressing cultural issues, we can do so without equivocation or compromise. We are pro-life, period. Abortion is wrong, period. Marriage is the union of a man and a woman, period.

We can quote Scriptures to support our views, and we can advocate for those views with love and compassion.

There’s no mixture. There’s no political affiliation. There’s no ambiguity. There’s simply truth. God’s truth.

There will be plenty of controversy and opposition, to be sure, hence the reason for my aforementioned video, challenging some of our compromise and cowardice.

But the issues, from a biblical perspective, are straightforward and clear.

It’s different, however, when it comes to voting.

First, every candidate is flawed in one way or another, and when we vote for them, we’re voting for an imperfect person.

Second, the political system itself is flawed, but not because the Founding Fathers lacked wisdom but because human beings run the political system. Consequently, there is corruption within politics. There are power games within politics. There is pride within politics.

Third, when we vote, unless it’s for a write-in candidate, we’re aligning ourselves with a political party. In contrast, when we stand for a moral or spiritual issue, we’re aligning ourselves with the Lord. There is quite a difference!

Fourth, when we are associated with a candidate publicly (either because we made our vote known and/or we endorsed the candidate), we are associated with that candidate for better or worse. So, if you have a Trump-Pence bumper sticker, in the eyes of others, you are linked with the latest good or bad done by that team.

Perhaps it is better to be associated with Jesus alone? Perhaps it is better for our reputations to be linked only to Him rather than to Obama or Trump or someone else?

One of my good friends, who was born and raised in Europe, has urged American Christians, especially leaders, to be politically involved by voting and advocating for godly causes, but to keep their voting choices private.

In his view, this separates us from the nastiness (and earthliness) of politics, thereby freeing us to be gospel witnesses.

For many Americans, this seems like odd council, since we often see political battles as battles for righteousness. Why should we hide our views? Why should we not be public and candid? Why should we make things so separate and distinct?

In the 2016 primaries, for the first time ever, I endorsed a political candidate (namely, Senator Ted Cruz), and to this moment, I would be delighted to see him as president and would gladly vote for him in the future.

But I do not believe I will endorse a candidate again. That’s because my most important ministry calling is to be a voice, and the moment I endorsed Cruz, everything I said about relevant issues (or, the other candidates) was filtered through that lens. “We can’t listen to you, because you’re a Cruz guy!”

As for other pastors and leaders and ministers, each one must find out what pleases God most, what best serves His cause, and what truly helps His people. For my part, I am not here to judge or lecture.

I simply encourage each of us, especially those of us in spiritual leadership, to reflect on the results of these polls, for whatever they’re worth.

And whatever our specific stance might be, let us be associated with the Lord Jesus infinitely more than with any political leader or party.


Dr. Michael Brown (www.askdrbrown.org) is the host of the nationally syndicated Line of Fire radio program.



TOPICS: Current Events; History; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: politics; stpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 09/12/2019 8:14:41 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If Paul was alive today he would be doing the same thing he did 2000 years ago. Preaching the Gospel and planting Churches.


2 posted on 09/12/2019 8:21:32 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He would either be in prison or a fugitive.


3 posted on 09/12/2019 8:22:13 AM PDT by Salman (The Democrat agenda in one word -- revenge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

From a jail cell?


4 posted on 09/12/2019 8:22:49 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He’d probably say something like ...

Put on, as God’s chosen ones, holy and beloved, heartfelt compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience, bearing with one another and forgiving one another, if one has a grievance against another; as the Lord has forgiven you, so must you also do. And over all these put on love, that is, the bond of perfection. And let the peace of Christ control your hearts, the peace into which you were also called in one Body. And be thankful. Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly, as in all wisdom you teach and admonish one another, singing psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs with gratitude in your hearts to God. And whatever you do, in word or in deed, do everything in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through him.


5 posted on 09/12/2019 8:27:42 AM PDT by al_c (Democrats: Party over Common Sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Another probing question on my mind is how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?


6 posted on 09/12/2019 8:28:15 AM PDT by richardtavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What a stupid question.


7 posted on 09/12/2019 8:28:56 AM PDT by Quality_Not_Quantity (A law means nothing if it isnÂ’t followed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Paul used the legal and political system to get a free ride to Rome. To preach to Caesar.

Festus to Agrippa to Caesar.


8 posted on 09/12/2019 8:33:46 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

More importantly, would he be able to correctly apply the subjunctive verb mood when writing headlines?


9 posted on 09/12/2019 8:36:18 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al_c; circlecity; SeekAndFind

Al & Circle,

Very good replies. I concur.

G-F


10 posted on 09/12/2019 8:49:04 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Paul used the legal and political system to get a free ride to Rome. To preach to Caesar.

Festus to Agrippa to Caesar.


Indeed. Even a casual reading of the Book of Acts gives us a Paul who is a Roman Citizen, with the rights, responsibilities, and duties of a Citizen. Even when an official remarked that his own citizenship had cost a lot of money, Paul replied "But I was BORN a Citizen!"

When he appealed to Caesar to hear his case, it even precluded his release. "This man could have been released if he hadn't appealed to Caesar!"

There was also an incident where he was about to be flogged by a Roman, and avoided it by announcing his Citizenship.

While Paul's "Citizenship" in the Kingdom of Heaven was Paramount, he did not discard his "citizenship" in the Roman Empire. Of Course, he now used it as a way of furthering the Gospel.
11 posted on 09/12/2019 8:51:53 AM PDT by left that other site (For America to have CONFIDENCE in our future, we must have PRIDE in our HISTORY... DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

Ha Ha! I see what you did! :-)


12 posted on 09/12/2019 8:52:50 AM PDT by left that other site (For America to have CONFIDENCE in our future, we must have PRIDE in our HISTORY... DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

“Preaching the Gospel and planting Churches.”

We have enough churches. I think Paul would be correcting and rebuking churches. The problem is almost all wouldn’t listen.


13 posted on 09/12/2019 8:53:35 AM PDT by alternatives? (Why have an army if there are no borders?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: alternatives?
We have enough churches. I think Paul would be correcting and rebuking churches. The problem is almost all wouldn’t listen.

Sadly, that's probably very accurate.

14 posted on 09/12/2019 8:55:22 AM PDT by al_c (Democrats: Party over Common Sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: alternatives?
"I think Paul would be correcting and rebuking churches."

Certainly Jude and Peter would.

15 posted on 09/12/2019 9:02:34 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

bump


16 posted on 09/12/2019 9:17:38 AM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

No. St. Paul would be in prison on charges of lying to the FBI in a fake investigation of a hoax.

While there he would write letters that would end up inspiring Christian faith for the rest of time.


17 posted on 09/12/2019 9:21:41 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity
Second, the political system itself is flawed, but not because the Founding Fathers lacked wisdom but because human beings run the political system.

What is the end result of the votes of 150,000,000 sinners?

"the Most High rules in the kingdom of men, and gives it to whomever He chooses.”" Daniel 4:32

18 posted on 09/12/2019 9:22:01 AM PDT by aimhigh (THIS is His commandment . . . . 1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

What would he say to the muslimes?


19 posted on 09/12/2019 9:26:59 AM PDT by jackibutterfly (A vote for ANY Democrat, whether it be in a local, st or fed election, is a vote against America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

How would Michael Brown’s grandmother feel about him requesting this type of projection from strangers? Or his great Aunt?


20 posted on 09/12/2019 9:36:35 AM PDT by GOPJ (I saw a movie about governments and weaponless people - - Schindler's List...freeper Chickensoup)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson