Excellent article. He’s an excellent writer and particularly on this subject.
The secularists somehow don’t seem to understand that they’re just being used by the Arab superiority cult that is Islam.
Mohammed was an Arab warlord. Because most of the non-Arab kingdoms or regions in the ME were greatly weakened after the fall of the Roman Empire (and its protections) and division between the Eastern and Western Church and its fragmentation by the Arian heresy and its descendants, he was able to storm and destroy much more advanced cultures and subject them to his ethnic cult.
The strange thing is the identification of US blacks with Islam, because in the Arab mind, sub-Saharan Africans were nothing but slaves, and the violent Islamic movements there are still led by North African Arabs.
Only Arabs (descendants of some part of Mohammed’s family) can be the really important people in Islam, and its “holy places” are, of course, in Saudi Arabia. Interestingly, one of the things the Iranians have been chanting, according to the translations I have seen, is “We are Aryans, not Arabs - no to Islam.” So I guess they get it.
“He’ll insist that it be replaced with something that more accurately reflects American diversity—say, a monument to Margaret Sanger or a statue of James Obergefell”
I’d be fine with all the Sanger statues we already have and more, if they’d be sited next to statues of the left’s other revered 20th century racial purist, Germany’s 1933-45 Chancellor.
Interesting will review later.
bkmk
The founder of the world’s fastest growing religion would be laughing his head off, if he could, seeing billions of a$$es lifted towards the sky 5 times a day and rotated up and down to the tune of “allakhu akbar.”
Butts up for allah.