Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colombian Professor Criticizes Pope Francis, Declared Excommunicated [Catholic Caucus]
One Peter Five ^ | July 31, 2017 | Maike HIckson

Posted on 08/01/2017 7:59:10 AM PDT by ebb tide

Some troubling news has, once more, just come to us from Colombia. As we reported a while ago, there was the case of Don Uribe Medina, a parish priest punished for criticizing Pope Francis and his novel teaching concerning marriage. Fortunately, that case was resolved on good terms, with Fr. Uribe’s own bishop now even fully defending the Church’s traditional teaching on marriage.

In the new case, however, Professor José Galat, former rector of the La Gran Colombia University and founder and owner of the television station Teleamiga, has been declared excommunicated for his purported schismatic attitude. More specifically, he and his own weekly TV program, Un Café con Galat (Coffee with Galat), have been accused of not being sufficiently obedient toward Pope Francis.

Significantly, it was Galat himself who, at the time of the Don Uribe case, hosted the priest and gave him the scope to defend his positions.

Galat himself recently made statements on his own television show, where, citing the “Sankt Gallen Mafia,” of whom Belgian cardinal Godfried Danneels is among the most famous members, he claimed that Pope Francis was unlawfully elected. He also claimed that Pope Francis is distorting many aspects of the Catholic Church’s fundamental teaching.

For these statements – and especially in light of the imminent mid-September 2017 visit of Pope Francis to Colombia – the bishops of Colombia have taken canonical steps against Prof. Galat.

One of the more unusual steps is that, on 26 July, Monsignor Pedro Mercado, president of the Ecclesiastical Tribunal of Bogotá, has published the following statement on Twitter (sic): “For obstinate disobedience toward the pope, José Galat has placed himself outside of the Communion with the Church. He cannot receive the Sacraments.” On the same day, the same prelate posted, again on his Twitter feed, a picture with himself and Pope Francis along with the caption: “I am Catholic and I am in communion!”

ACI Prensa, the Spanish branch of Catholic News Agency (CNA), has already published two articles on this Galat case. On 25 July, ACI Prensa reported that the Episcopal Conference of Colombia (CEC) “lamented the content of the Colombian television channel Teleamiga, which claims to be of Catholic inspiration but which attacks Pope Francis.” The bishops now “urged priests, religious, and lay people to cease any support they give” to this program. In their 25 July statement, the bishops also state that “Teleamiga does not represent, nor reflect, the teaching of the Catholic Church; therefore it cannot call itself a ‘Catholic channel.’” Here ACI Prensa also directly quotes the bishops: “Based on Canon Law, we point out that, by rejecting submission to the Pope and seriously injuring the communion of the Church, a schism is thereby incurred and other people are [thus also] induced to fall into it.”

The Colombian bishops – three of whom have signed the statement, among them the president of the Episcopal Conference – especially criticized the messages coming from Un Café con Galat as carried out by the founder and director of Teleamiga. The bishops accuse him of sowing among the Catholic faithful, with the help of “superficial and harmful arguments,” “attitudes of detachment and doubt regarding the validity of the pontificate of Pope Francis.”

The Colombian bishops also stressed that they have sought “the way of dialogue” with Galat “over the years.” “However, a calm and fruitful approach has not been possible, nor has there been a change of attitude [on his part],” they added. Next to telling Catholics not to support the channel anymore, the bishops also declare that “it is an absolute contradiction that the Teleamiga channel should continue to transmit the celebration [and Sacrifice] of the Eucharist and that, in its facilities, there is to be found the Blessed Sacrament [reserved].”

Teleamiga has been airing traditional Masses. The Colombian bishops advise the faithful to look for other ways and means to find “sound doctrine.” For example, the bishops have explicitly invited the faithful to prepare themselves well for a welcome of Pope Francis on his upcoming visit to Colombia (Bogotá, Villavicencio, Medellín, and Cartagena) and to listen to him “with docility.”

It might be of worth to note that the Archdiocese of Bogotá, Colombia is also about to host a conference given by Monsignor Pio Vito Pinto, dean of the Roman Rota, concerning the papal document Amoris Laetitia, with 600 participants in registered attendance already.

Teleamiga is a television station licensed, among others, by the La Gran Colombia University, Bogotá, whose rector was Professor Galat himself from 1981 to 2017. Galat has studied political sciences and philosophy at different universities in Paris, France; Barcelona, Spain; and Colombia. He is now 88 years of age…and just excommunicated.

On 26 July, ACI Prensa published a follow-up report on the Galat case, quoting Bishop Mercado: “[W]ith his angry response to the episcopate and his obstinate rejection of Pope Francis, Dr. José Galat has placed himself outside the communion of the Catholic Church[.] … He should not be admitted to the sacraments until he shows clear signs of repentance.” According to Bishop Mercado, “heresy and schism are typified as canonical offenses punished with (automatic) excommunication latae sententiae.” The bishop added, “Those who have committed this crime may not receive the sacraments of the Church until manifesting a visible and sincere repentance.”

At this point, Galat is disallowed from receiving even a Catholic burial. According to the bishop, “by disobeying Pope Francis in a visible, public, and reiterated way, Dr. Galat has placed himself outside the communion of the Church.”

According to ACI Prensa, Bishop Mercado said, “[I]t is painful for me to realize that Dr. Galat, who for so many years served the Church faithfully, has ended his days in this pitiful spiritual situation.”

These tones do not sound very merciful, at least to some observers.

Prof. Galat himself has now responded on two occasions. First, on 25 July, he declared that “it is true that a Catholic must have love and adherence to the legitimate successor of the Apostle Peter.” But, according to Galat, one wonders about a pope “not chosen by God, but by men and even worse by a ‘mafia of cardinals,’” as it had been called by “Cardinal Godfried Danneels himself, who, with savvy, publicly declared that this mob determined the resignation of Benedict XVI and put Francis in the papacy.” Galat goes so far to say that the present pontiff’s election “was the work of a political and corrupt mafia of cardinals.” The Colombian professor insisted that this is said not by him, but by Cardinal Danneels himself, as can be shown with the help of different sources, among them an article written by Edward Pentin. Galat also spoke about Francis’s “undoubted illegitimacy of origin,” complemented by an “illegitimate exercise of teaching doctrines contrary to the Catholic Faith.” As examples, he mentioned Francis’s claim that everyone is saved, that proselytism is foolish, and that adulterers may receive Communion.

Galat claimed that he has presented even more facts on his television program. He also spoke about the “nonsense of him who figures [presents himself] as pontiff.” He accused the Bishops’ Conference of branding as formal “schismatics those who try to defend the Faith, when it is exactly the opposite.” Galat explained that those who attack the Catholic truths are, in fact, the ones who put themselves outside the Church. He concluded that “‘false and harmful’ is the silence of those who are called to defend the Faith”; those who now practice “complicity or cowardice” also want to destroy Teleamiga, which does actually defend the Faith.

Galat “very respectfully” challenged the “Colombian episcopate itself to respond and to counter-argue – with the help of biblical evidence and the traditional teaching of the Church” in order to show “what are our alleged mistakes that have caused their ‘superficial and noxious’ anger.” And: “Why do they persecute those who defend the Faith of the Church?”

On 26 July, the day after his first response to the episcopal steps taken against him, Professor Galat also responded on his Facebook page to the claim that he is using “harmful and superficial” arguments. Galat rejected these reproaches, applying the same words to some of the confusing teachings coming these days from the Catholic hierarchy itself. “False and harmful are the heresies taught by theologians, bishops, cardinals, and even by Pope Francis – and not the defense of the truths of the Faith as we have undertaken it on our channel.” “False and harmful” are, in Galat’s eyes, those who, instead, endanger the salvation of souls by teaching “false doctrines against the Faith of the Church, taught and sustained by Pope Francis.” Amoris Laetitia was also mentioned here for calling “sin” [i.e., adultery] an “irregular situation.” “And harmful it is to destroy the family with the virtual legalization of adultery which is now to be easily achieved, according to the principles enshrined in that document,” explained Galat. After naming more examples, he concluded: “False and harmful are a multitude of other wrong teachings of  the current pope.” Galat posted this same statement on the website of Teleamiga.

The Galat case has, so far, not been widely covered. But the well respected Catholic website Infovaticana published on 29 July a comment that asserts Professor Galat’s inclination to make himself the center of his TV program, in spite of his alleged defective theological expertise. The article uses even harsher language that I prefer not to repeat. To an outsider like me, this article and tone seem inappropriate amid a grave situation where an 88-year-old Catholic man who seems to have contributed so much to the common good of his country – also economically, by fostering community-based enterprises that help the poor – is now threatened to be indefinitely excluded from the Sacraments. Is this to be a fitting manifestation of the newly (and more expansively) merciful Church? Is this how Pope Francis’s welcome is to be prepared in Colombia – at the expense of an elderly Catholic veteran?

We might not agree with all of Galat’s own forceful statements and sweeping assertions, which certainly are hard to prove. They might also lack prudence.

But we might also remember in this context that the well respected Italian journalist and papal critic Antonio Socci – who not many years ago also argued that the election of Pope Francis was invalid – received last year a personal letter from the pope, thanking him for his work and welcoming his criticism. How is it that one critic receives a papal thank-you note, while another – and much older – gentleman receives an excommunication?

Update: Infovaticana now published, today, another post on Prof. Galat, more differentiated, showing his many achievements and, while saying they don’t share Galat’s theses, calling Pope Francis to prudence.

They also add the information that we should add, too – namely, “His Teleamiga Television Channel, of which he is co-founder and director, reaches 35 countries and more than 50 million homes.”


TOPICS: Catholic
KEYWORDS: francischurch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 08/01/2017 7:59:10 AM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Francis needs to GO

2 posted on 08/01/2017 8:24:11 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

There is no acceptance at all of dissent within the Church. The pope is the supreme, and only authority.
Note that this priest was kicked out for saying: “the present pontiff’s election was the work of a political and corrupt mafia of cardinals”.
Note that the current pope has not yet condemned those who took part in the gay orgy at the Vatican, and he promoted the nuclear ‘deal’ with Iran.


3 posted on 08/01/2017 8:27:51 AM PDT by I want the USA back (If free speech is taken away, dumb and silent we are led, like sheep to the slaughter: G Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
Bergoglio again disgraces himself and the Papacy, while shaming over a billion of the laity... How long must this continue? Why have the faithful clergy chosen to not yet unify to defend the Church? We know nothing shall prevail against the Apostolic Church, but it still sickens me to witness such heresies!
4 posted on 08/01/2017 8:38:13 AM PDT by heterosupremacist (Domine Iesu Christe, Filius Dei, miserere me peccatorem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heterosupremacist

In Old Testament times God would have sent the Babylonians to sack the Temple and carry the people off to captivity. Would not want to be in Rome right now.


5 posted on 08/01/2017 8:46:44 AM PDT by JerryBlackwell (some animals are more equal than others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: heterosupremacist

Personally, I keep thinking/hoping the guy might be a short-termer, due to operating on only one lung.

The lack of information among the laity is a factor as well. Most of my Catholic friends just know the Pope from his charming soundbites, not the offensive ones.


6 posted on 08/01/2017 8:56:34 AM PDT by married21 ( As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back
The pope is the supreme, and only authority.

No. The Pope is the Vicar of Christ, who is the ultimate of authority of the Church. He is charged with protecting Church Teaching, Dogma and Tradition.

While Pope is the earthly head of the Roman Catholic Church, his authority has restrictions on it. He is a monarch, but nowhere has the Church ever taught that he can contradict Church teaching, or the good of the Church.

A monsignor does NOT have the authority to declare a latae sententiae excommunication, which is best declared only for actions that are clear-cut rather than words (e.g. successfully procuring or helping to procure an abortion). If anyone were serious about this, the layman who would be excommunicated should have an opportunity to receive a formal charge, and respond to it. Latae sententiae is a lazy out, and should apply to every Catholic government official who has voted for abortion would be subject to it if it were that easy. (Of course, they may already be, and they are likely in a state of continuous mortal sin and cannot recieve Cmmunion anyway).
7 posted on 08/01/2017 9:00:21 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: married21
#6 married21 - " The lack of information among the laity is a factor as well". Agreed. The clergy must be held accountable for not speaking out against these unpleasant developments...
8 posted on 08/01/2017 9:07:07 AM PDT by heterosupremacist (Domine Iesu Christe, Filius Dei, miserere me peccatorem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

That’s all true, but just a minor point: “monsignor” is a mis-translation of the Spanish or possibly Italian original, where monseñor is the title used when addressing or speaking about a bishop. So these are bishops, actually, the Colombian bishops’ conference, apparently.

That said, if they chose the latae sententiae route, essentially saying he has automatically excommunicated himself, that means that they didn’t want to do a formal excommunication, probably because they knew there simply weren’t grounds for it. Cowardly weasels, in other words.


9 posted on 08/01/2017 9:09:01 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Francis the floozy calling others schism mongerers...


10 posted on 08/01/2017 9:31:15 AM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucifiedc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heterosupremacist
Why have the faithful clergy chosen to not yet unify to defend the Church?

By choosing not to do so, how are they "faithful clergy"? Whatever happened to the Dubia Three by the way?

11 posted on 08/01/2017 9:33:09 AM PDT by piusv (Pray for a return to the pre-Vatican II (Catholic) Faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Interesting...excommunicated for words, while liberal politicians and quacks in the US who aggressively push, commit and fund child murder get a pass.

Nice going, Frank.


12 posted on 08/01/2017 10:15:34 AM PDT by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius
“monsignor” is a mis-translation of the Spanish or possibly Italian original, where monseñor is the title used when addressing or speaking about a bishop.

Ah, I hadn't known the expression. I know that the French often referred to Archbishop Lefebvre as Monsignor, I hadn't known that mode was common in the Spanish/Italian-speaking world as well. Thanks for the gentle correction.
13 posted on 08/01/2017 10:24:32 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: livius; Dr. Sivana

For what it’s worth, there is no “Bishop Pedro Mercado” listed on the Church Hierarchy website.

http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/bishop/llm2.html


15 posted on 08/01/2017 10:56:33 AM PDT by ebb tide (Shaking dust off feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JAKraig
There are many who are Vicars of Christ. In the Roman Catholic Church the Pope is simply the senior Cardinal

The Pope is not necessarily a "senior Cardinal" or a Cardinal at all. He is accurately described as the "Bishop of Rome". As to the rest of your piece, I was addressing those who are Roman Catholic and accept the Catholic definition of things. Catholics do not accept there being more than one Vicar of Christ at a time.
16 posted on 08/01/2017 11:04:34 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: piusv
By choosing not to do so, how are they "faithful clergy"? . You raise a valid point.
17 posted on 08/01/2017 11:28:32 AM PDT by heterosupremacist (Domine Iesu Christe, Filius Dei, miserere me peccatorem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana; ebb tide; piusv

THANK you.

There had to be a difference between “obedience to a Holy Father” and being led to perdition!

Scripture is plain that Wolves will be among the Sheep and will lead many to perdition. Seems to me that what is obvious today is crystal clear in that scripture passage.

The Rome crowd seems to change nothing on paper, but fiddles with everything, in practice. This enables them to claim Tradition, officially, while in practice allowing deviant interpretation willy nilly.


18 posted on 08/01/2017 11:34:57 AM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Education/Academia are the farm team for more Marxists coming... infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

ebb tide - For what it’s worth, there is no “Bishop Pedro Mercado” listed on the Church Hierarchy website.

http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/bishop/llm2.html

I don’t understand your comment, what is the significance of his non-inclusion in this list?


19 posted on 08/01/2017 11:35:11 AM PDT by heterosupremacist (Domine Iesu Christe, Filius Dei, miserere me peccatorem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: heterosupremacist

I was just pointing out that no bishop has yet been identified as issuing the declaration of “excommunication”.


20 posted on 08/01/2017 11:39:00 AM PDT by ebb tide (Shaking dust off feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson