Posted on 07/11/2017 10:44:41 AM PDT by ebb tide
Pope Francis received a noteworthy honor last week when Ahmed al-Tayeb, the Grand Imam of Cairos al-Azhar, thanked him for his defense of Islam against the accusation of violence and terrorism.
Has any other Pope of Rome in the history of Christianity ever been heralded as a defender of Islam?
Of course not. But the Catholic Church has come a long way since the days of Pope Callixtus III, who vowed in 1455 to exalt the true Faith, and to extirpate the diabolical sect of the reprobate and faithless Mahomet in the East.
If time travel could be arranged and Pope Francis could run into Callixtus III, Callixtus could expect a punch, for Francis is not just a defender of Islam, but a defender of the Sharia death penalty for blasphemy: after Islamic jihadists murdered the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists who had drawn Muhammad, Francis obliquely justified the murders by saying that it is true that you must not react violently, but although we are good friends if [an aide] says a curse word against my mother, he can expect a punch, its normal. You cant make a toy out of the religions of others. These people provoke and then (something can happen). In freedom of expression there are limits.
So for the Pope, murdering people for violating Sharia blasphemy laws is normal, and it isnt terrorism for Christian terrorism does not exist, Jewish terrorism does not exist, and Muslim terrorism does not exist. They do not exist, he said in a speech last February. There are fundamentalist and violent individuals in all peoples and religionsand with intolerant generalizations they become stronger because they feed on hate and xenophobia.
So there is no Islamic terrorism, but if you engage in intolerant generalizations, you can expect a punch. The Pope, like the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, apparently thinks that the problem is not jihad terror, but non-Muslims talking about jihad terror; Muslims would be peaceful if non-Muslims would simply censor themselves and self-impose Sharia blasphemy restrictions regarding criticism of Islam.
For Pope Francis has no patience with those who discuss such matters: I dont like to talk about Islamic violence, because every day, when I read the newspaper, I see violence. He said, according to Crux, that when he reads the newspaper, he reads about an Italian who kills his fiancé or his mother in law. The pontiff added: They are baptized Catholics. They are violent Catholics. He said that if he spoke about Islamic violence, then he would have to speak about Catholic violence as well.
That comparison made no sense, for Italian Catholics who killed their fiancés or mothers in law were not acting in accord with the teachings of their religion, while the Quran and Islamic teaching contain numerous exhortations to violence.
But Pope Francis, defender of Islam, cannot concern himself with such minutiae. Nor does he appear to be particularly concerned about the fact that all his false statements about the motivating ideology behind the massive Muslim persecution of Christians over the last few years only enables and abets that persecution, for if that ideology is not identified and confronted, it will continue to flourish.
The Pope of Rome, whom Catholics consider to be the earthly head of the Church, should be a defender of Christianity, not a defender of Islam, the religion that has been at war with Christianity and Judeo-Christian civilization since its earliest days. That any Christian leader would be called a defender of Islam by anyone only casts into vivid relief the absurdity of our age and the weakness of the free world. Can you imagine any Muslim leader ever being called a defender of Christianity? Of course not: Muslim leaders are more aware than their fond defender in the Vatican that Islam mandates warfare against unbelievers, not defense of their theological views.
Pope Francis is not only disastrously wrongheaded about an obvious fact that is reinforced by every days headlines; he is also deceiving and misleading his people about a matter of utmost importance, and keeping them ignorant and complacent about a growing and advancing threat.
Leave them; they are blind guides. And if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit. (Matthew 15:14)\
Jesus Christ is the head of the Church. Fallible men are not.
Papa Francisco - The Vicar of Christ, or maybe the Vicar of mohammed? Disgraceful!
What a f$@ked up time we are living now
In a similar vein: if Andrew Jackson suddenly appeared in DC today he’d be pistol whipping folks till his pistols fell apart.
An absolute disgrace and set the Catholic Church back in many ways.
This man is a total disgrace to Christianity. He is on George Soros’ payroll.
Bring back Benedict!!
PSSST! I can convert the Church for you when it’s time.
Bergoglio will do something that will drive all Catholics out of the Church. Womyn priests? A Lutheran “mass”?
He has seized the assets of the Knights of Malta. He has destroyed Pell and his investigations. He has snuffed out the “conservative” diocesan religious communities. He has seized control of contemplative communities.
Once he drives out the Catholics, Bergoglio will have the buildings, the money, and massive government funding.
But the Catholic Church has come a long way since the days of Pope Callixtus III, who vowed in 1455 to exalt the true Faith, and to extirpate the diabolical sect of the reprobate and faithless Mahomet in the East.
Yeah, since Vatican II. Once again, we've got folks claiming this is a Francis issue when Church teaching towards the religion of Islam changed at Vatican II....
When we have other post Vatican II popes praying with Muslims in their mosques (Benedict) or at inter-faith gatherings such as Assisi (JPII). When we have other post Vatican II popes (JPII) kissing the holy book of what used to be called a false, diabolical religion. When we have other post Vatican II popes (Benedict) supposedly speaking up against Islam but then apologizing because his comments offended Muslims (all the while assuring them that those comments weren't really his personal view of Islam anyway).
What about the halakhic death penalty for homosexuality?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.