Posted on 06/29/2017 7:36:33 PM PDT by ebb tide
A Christian fathers seven-year battle with his public school board over his right to advance notice when and how his children will be taught about controversial topics, particularly LGBTTIQ issues, landed in Ontarios appeal court this week.
But at this point, Hamilton father of two Steve Tourloukis and his lawyer, Albertos Polizogopoulos, are fighting not only the school board but the elementary teachers union and openly lesbian Premier Kathleen Wynnes Liberal government.
This appeal is about protecting the rights of parents to direct their childrens education, and to protect the religious freedom of parents and their children, states Tourloukis appeal factum.
And whether LGBTTIQ issues are or are even meant to be taught in public schools in a values-neutral way, given Liberal policies and laws to eliminate homophobia in schools, was a question that occupied much of Mondays hearing.
Indeed, lawyers opposing Tourloukis referred to the Equity and Inclusivity Education Strategy that Wynne implemented in 2009 when she was minister of education and Ben Levin her deputy minister.
Levin, who noted in a memo when the EIES was introduced that the province-wide strategy has been a priority for our Minister of Education Kathleen Wynne and me, was convicted in March 2015 of three child pornography related charges, including counseling another person to rape a minor, and sentenced in May to 3 1/2 years in prison.
Tourloukis initial 2010 request for religious accommodation and the board refusal were both based on the boards equity policy, mandated by the Wynne-Levin EIES.
He asked to be alerted beforehand when and how his children, then four and six, would be taught not only about homosexuality but other contentious issues such as abortion, the occult, and cultural relativism so he could decide whether to withdraw them from class.
Tourloukis made it clear in his 2012 legal challenge he did not object to his children being taught facts, or to discussions and opinions by classmates on these subjects.
But he did object to teachers, who are authority figures, making value judgments in class, such as presenting homosexuality as natural, or abortion as morally acceptable.
Polizogopoulos argued in the initial hearing and on appeal that the boards refusal to grant Tourloukis request violates his Charter right to religious freedom, because he believes his Christian faith obliges him to protect his children from false teachings and not lead his children into sin.
Tourloukis also believes same-sex sexual relations are not Gods intention of sex, that there are but two genders: male and female, that marriage is a sacred institution, and he must raise his children according to this Christian faith and Gods holy law, his appeal factum notes.
Ontario Superior Court Justice Robert Reid ruled in November the board did violate Tourloukis Charter rights, but the violation was reasonable given the competing Charter values of inclusivity, equality and multiculturalism, and public school boards statutory obligations.
Reid also suggested Tourloukis could pull his children from public schools.
Polizogopoulos asked Appeal Court Justices Peter Lauwers, Bradley Miller, and Robert Sharpe to reverse Reids decision.
As in the original June 2016 hearing, Polizogopoulos was up against three publicly funded legal teams: for the Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board, the Liberal government, and the Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario.
Christian Legal Fellowship lawyers were present Monday as intervenors to argue on Tourloukis behalf.
The boards lawyer argued a public school is not allowed to indoctrinate students, but that Ontarios public schools have statutory obligation to create safe schools, including the EIES, Policy Memorandum 119, and the 2012 Accepting Schools Act, or Bill 13.
Accommodating Tourloukis would directly impact the ability of Ontario public schools to provide students with a positive, inclusive, and supportive educational environment.
Liberal government lawyer Josh Hunter said allowing the Tourloukis children to leave class would undermine the boards message that it is important to accept, welcome, and celebrate diversity and would be harmful to the rights of other students to feel accepted and welcomed.
And ETFO lawyer Kate Hughes argued teachers are mandated by law to embed positive examples of homosexuality, lesbianism, transgenderism, and queerness throughout the curriculum, and to teach children not just to tolerate LGBTQ lifestyle, which has a negative connotation, but to honour and respect and celebrate it.
Reid essentially ruled the same in November, writing that allowing Tourloukis to pull his children from certain classes would be antithetical to the competing legislative mandate and Charter values favoring inclusivity equality and multiculturalism.
Lauwers questioned Polizogopoulos on Monday why he had no affidavit evidence of teachers giving value judgments in class.
Polizogopoulos responded that Reids ruling didnt question that aspect of the case but accepted that Tourloukis Charter rights were being infringed in this regard, and that such an infringement was reasonable.
Jack Fonseca, Campaign Life Coalitions senior political strategist, was present at the hearing and contends that the ETFO lawyers submission was a brazen, unashamed admission that indoctrination was the goal.
Hughes explained that teachers have a statutory obligation to honour and respect diversity which includes same-sex relationships and transgender identities, he told LifeSiteNews.
She conflated honouring and respecting with celebrating and argued that teachers have a statutory obligation to celebrate LGBT identities and same-sex relationships, and that if teachers arent embedding that celebration into every subject every day, then theyre not meeting the statutory objectives, he told LifeSiteNews.
At least one teacher has openly admitted to embedding LGBTQ propaganda throughout the curriculum. Alice Gunn, a Mississauga elementary school teacher who is married to a woman, told a pro-gay conference she uses math class to push the homosexual agenda, as LifeSiteNews reported in April 2015.
But as Hughes told the appeal court, thats considered exemplary conduct and would not be an exception.
While this radical and brazen agenda of the teachers union is shocking and disturbing, Fonseca said, we hope it serves to give the judges the evidence they claimed was lacking in Tourloukis submission.
This is an important court case, says Lou Iacobelli, president of the Parental Rights In Education Defense Fund, which is helping to bankroll Tourloukis legal odyssey.
Because if the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Constitution are used to legitimize beyond question inclusive and diversity education, then Canadians have little protection from the power of the state, Iacobelli wrote in his blog.
We must reject a blueprint for moral conformity decided by the state.
The three justices reserved their judgment.
Those who wish to donate to the legal costs of the Tourloukis case, go here.
What the hell does any good parent doing by allowing their child in a public school?
Really?
If only all Dads would quit being pansies and take a stand on these social issues. . . .
This type of education is why a lot of parents home school.
rwood
Such expensive futility. He should be exercising his right to get his kids the hell out of the whole Public “Education” system. If he cared about their education so much as he claims he would not be wasting his time and money tilting at that particular windmill but would be homeschooling his children.
I send my money to a private, Catholic school along with my kids.
JoMa
Why are the “good” teachers cooperating? Oh?...Wait!?...There are no good government teachers?
Exactly. Let this be a wake-up call to dads out there. The education establishment is going to become more and more ruthless in its ambition to indoctrinate your kids.
I know there are always tough economic decisions that need to be made and plenty of excuses why it can’t work in this or that situation, but darn it, dads, you need to make this your top priority and move heaven and earth if necessary to get this done. Take control of your kids’ education or the cultural Marxists will do the job for you.
WTF? Pull your kids out of school. That hurts the schools bottom line. Problem solved.
No one should force a child to endure fag training
Schools are meant and funded to teach academics i.e. reading writing and arithmetic not how to be a fag or tolerate perversion
Homeschool.
Your taxes are still going to the indoctrination centers whether you send your kids there or not.
The majority of parents can’t afford private school or do not have the ability to home school. If people want to break this cycle they will have to donate serious money to get kids out of the public system and fund private schools for every kid that needs it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.