Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DNA Discovery of Ancient Mummies Supports Biblical Narrative of Descendants of Ham, Son of Noah
Christian Post ^ | 06/27/2017 | Stoyan Zaimov

Posted on 06/27/2017 8:49:05 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

The biblical narrative that the first Egyptian Dynasty descended from the biblical Ham, the son of Noah, as told in the book of Genesis, could well be supported by recent research based on DNA taken from Egyptian mummies, analysts said.


(Photo: REUTERS/Mohamed Abd El Ghany)
Egyptian Minister of Antiquities Khaled Al-Anani inside a newly discovered burial site in Minya, Egypt May 13, 2017.

According to CNN, researchers from the University of Tuebingen and the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena, both in Germany, found "unexpected results" when decoding the genome of ancient Egyptians.

Their work, published online in Nature Communications, concluded that preserved remains found in Abusir-el Meleq, Middle Egypt, were the closest genetic relatives of Neolithic and Bronze Age populations from the Near East, Anatolia and Eastern Mediterranean Europeans.

"We found the ancient Egyptian samples falling distinct from modern Egyptians, and closer towards Near Eastern and European samples," the researchers noted. "In contrast, modern Egyptians are shifted towards sub-Saharan African populations."

What this means, according to commentary in Breaking Israel News, is that the latest scientific findings correlate with biblical accounts, such as Genesis 10:5-6, which states:

"Of these were the isles of the nations divided in their lands, every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations. And the sons of Ham: Cush, and Mizraim (or Egypt according to the New International Version of the Bible), and Put, and Canaan."

Adam Eliyahu Berkowitz of BIN said: "According to the Bible, Mizraim settled in Egypt whereas Cush settled in Africa, establishing two distinct and separate nations that did not share a common heritage. The scientific theory implies the origins of Africa and Egypt were the same."

The research is based on 166 samples from 151 mummified individuals in Abusir el-Meleq dating back 1,300 years of Egyptian history, from about 1388 BCE to 426 CE.

Using DNA capture techniques, the researchers "successfully obtained complete human mitochondrial genomes from 90 samples and genome-wide SNP data from three male individuals passing quality control."

Professor Johannes Krause of the Max Planck Institute explained that previous DNA analysis of mummies has been treated with skepticism.

"When you touch a bone, you probably leave more DNA on the bone than is inside [it]," Krause said. "Contamination is a big issue. ... Only in the last five or six years has it become possible to actually study DNA from ancient humans, because we can now show whether DNA is ancient or not by [its] chemical properties."

He added that he expects there "will be a ton of ancient Egyptian mummy genomes [mapped] in the next couple of years," with the research just beginning.

As BNI pointed out, the new findings coincide with the Dynastic Race Theory by archaeologist David Rohl, who believed that ancient Egyptians arrived over sea from Mesopotamia, conquered the Nile Valley, and established the first Egyptian dynasties.

Rohl's theory was based on the biblical account of Ham, who moved with his people from Mesopotamia to settle in Egypt after the Great Flood.

Rohl led an expedition in 1988 into Wadi Hammamat, a dry river bed in Egypt's Eastern Desert, which studied ancient wall drawings depicting longs boats with as many as 70 oarsmen.

The drawings are said to have conformed to the archaeologist's theory of an influx of Mesopotamian elite who arrived in Egypt by sailing around the coastline of the Arabian Peninsula into the Red Sea.


TOPICS: History; Religion & Science
KEYWORDS: bible; dna; ham; noah

1 posted on 06/27/2017 8:49:05 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

later


2 posted on 06/27/2017 9:01:22 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.L)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

David Rohl’s books are excellent, and pretty well researched.


3 posted on 06/27/2017 9:08:09 AM PDT by redgolum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"We found the ancient Egyptian samples falling distinct from modern Egyptians, and closer towards Near Eastern and European samples,"

I doubt that these findings came as a surprise to anyone except those indoctrinated by Afro-Centrist pseudo-scholarship (i.e. Black radicals and their Leftist allies who make the nonsensical claim that ancient Egyptians were "black"). Even without DNA analysis, it's long been clear from the facial features of mummies (and Egyptian self-depiction in statues, masks, and paintings) that Ancient Egyptians were of Mediterranean/Near Eastern descent and not descended from Sub-Saharan Africans.

4 posted on 06/27/2017 9:14:34 AM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Don’t bet against the Bible. You’ll lose every time.


5 posted on 06/27/2017 9:18:12 AM PDT by beethovenfan (I always try to maximize my carbon footprint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
David Rohl’s books are excellent, and pretty well researched.

So many books... so little time to read...


6 posted on 06/27/2017 9:27:16 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

While I agree with most of what David Rohl has proposed, including the revived Dynastic Race Theory, the above article only talks about taking DNA from mummies dating back to 1388 B.C. That’s the XVIII dynasty according to conventional chronology, and the Second Intermediate Period on Rohl’s chronology. You have to go back another 1,500 years at least to get to the beginning of ancient Egypt. I’d be convinced this article was right if we had any I dynasty mummies to test. Too bad the arm bones of King Djer were thrown away!


7 posted on 06/27/2017 9:47:25 AM PDT by Berosus (I wish I had as much faith in God as liberals have in government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ek_hornbeck

In their depictions of themselves, they’ve always looked more “Eurasian” to me.


8 posted on 06/27/2017 10:33:54 AM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I have a lot of them.


9 posted on 06/27/2017 10:40:00 AM PDT by redgolum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Ancient Egyptians are those that lived in the Old Kingdom prior to 2,181 BCE or even a thousand years before that (around 3,500 BCE). The mummies studied were from a period almost 1,000 years later - 1388 BCE to 426 CE. This is the New kingdom period. Bogus conclusions.


10 posted on 06/27/2017 12:05:17 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson