You want a “written summary” then I’ll give you the “Morgana Notes” (not Cliff notes)
The “baby” is the problem not premarital sex with most people who run Christian schools.
If they found out a girl or a boy were having premarital sex they would take them to the office and “counsel” them. Same if they found out a girl was having premarital sex, was using contraception or and had an abortion. However none of these kids, boys or girls would be kicked from school.
The only one to be kicked from school is the girl who gets pregnant and does not have an abortion. The message here is “the baby is the problem”. These Christian schools could sit down with Planned Parenthood and agree! The baby is evidence of the crime thus the baby must go.
The message these Christians schools send is “get rid of the baby”. So the girl after the case of Maddi Runkles will have an abortion. Either because the girl does not want to go through this or her parents will say “look what happened to that girl Maddi Runkles, you will not put our family thought is and will graduate!” Thus an abortion will happen.
If the girl goes, the boy who got her pregnant should go.
NO ONE gets pregnant in a vacuum.
This penalizing the girl and letting the guy get off scott free is a horrible double standard.
I read but I do not watch videos.
Did she get kicked from school or was she just told she could not walk with her class?
I agree that the punishment should be co-ed. But a baby does change things.
My point in my earlier post remains.
Actions have consequences.
When you bring in a third innocent into it then the consequences multiply.