Posted on 05/03/2017 7:05:20 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
During his visit to Egypt last week, Pope Francis visited al-Azhar University, a globally respected institution for Sunni Islamic learning, and met with Sheikh Ahmed al-Tayeb, the imam of the government-run Al-Azhar mosque and an Islamic philosophy professor. This has been reported by several media and with much fanfare.
The problem is that Sheikh Tayeb, once voted worlds most influential Muslim, and Al Azhar, the important madrassa he heads, are part of the problem, not the solution. Tayeb is a renowned master of exhibiting one face to fellow Muslims in Egyptone that supports the death penalty for apostates, calls for the totality of Sharia-rule, refuses to denounce ISIS of being un-Islamic, denounces all art as immoral, and rejects the very concept of reforming Islamand another face to non-Muslims.
Consider, for instance, the words of Islam al-Beherya popular Egyptian Muslim reformer who frequently runs afoul of Islamists in Egypt who accuse him of blasphemy and apostasy from Islam. The day after the suicide bombings of two Coptic Christian churches in Egypt, the Muslim scholar was interviewed by phone on a popular Egyptian television program (Amr Adibs kul youm, or Every Day). He spent most of his time on the air blasting Al Azhar and Ahmed al-Tayebat one point going so far as to say that 70-80 percent of all terror in the last 5 years is a product of Al Azhar.
The reformer knows what he speaks of; in 2015, al- Beherys televised calls to reform Islam so irked Al Azhar that the venerable Islamic institution accused him of blaspheming against Islam, which led to his imprisonment.
Now Behery says that, ever since President Sisi implored Al Azhar to make reforms to how Islam is being taught in Egypt three years ago, the authoritative madrassa has not reformed a single thing, only offered words. If they were sincere about one thing, they would have protected hundreds, indeed thousands of lives from being killed in just Egypt alone, said al-Behery.
By way of examples, the scholar of Islam pointed out that Al Azhar still uses books in its curriculum which teach things like whoever kills an infidel, his blood is safeguarded, for the blood of an infidel and believer [Muslim] are not equal. Similarly, he pointed to how Sheikh Ahmed al-Tayeb claims that ISIS members are not infidels, only deluded Muslims; but those whom they killsuch as the bombed Christiansare infidels, the worst label in Islams lexicon.
Debating Behery was an Al Azhar spokesman who naturally rejected the reformers accusations against the Islamic madrassa, adding that the source of problems in Egypt is not the medieval institution, but rather new ideas that came to Egypt from 20th century radicals like Hasan al-Bana and Sayyid Qutb, founding leaders/ideologues of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Beherys response was refreshing; those many Western analysts who follow the same line of thinkingthat radicalism only came after thinkers like Bana, Qutb, Mawdudi (in Pakistan) or Wahhab (in Arabia) came on the scenewould do well to listen. After saying that blaming radicalism on these men is very delusional, the reformer correctly added:
The man who kills himself [Islamic suicide bomber] today doesnt kill himself because of the words of Hasan al-Bana or Sayyid al-Qutb, or anyone else. He kills himself because of what the consensus of the ulema, and the four schools of jurisprudence, have all agreed to. Hasan al-Bana did not create these ideas [of jihad against infidels and apostates, destroying churches, etc.]; theyve been around for many, many centuries . I am talking about Islam [now], not how it is being taught in schools.
By way of example, Behery said if anyone today walks into any Egyptian mosque or bookstore and ask for a book that contains the rulings of the four schools of jurisprudence, everything that is happening today will be found in them; killing the people of the book [Christians and Jews] is obligatory. Lets not start kidding each other and blaming such thoughts on Hassan al-Bana! Moreover, Behery said:
There is a short distance between what is written in all these old books and what happened yesterday [Coptic church bombings]the real bomb is in the books, which repeatedly call the People of the Book infidels, which teach that the whole world is infidel Hassan al-Bana and Sayyid al-Qutb are not the source of the terror, rather they are followers of these books. Spare me with the term Qutbism which has caused the nation to suffer terrorism for 50 years.
Behery does not blame Al Azhar for the existence of these books; rather he, like many reformers, wants the Islamic institution to break tradition, denounce the rulings of the four schools of law as the products of fallible mortals, and reform them in ways compatible to the modern world. He said that, whereas Egypts former grand imam, Sheikh Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi (d. 2010), had without even being asked removed all the old books and placed just one introductory book, when al-Tayeb [who days ago embraced Pope Francis] came, he got rid of that book and brought all the old books back, which are full of slaughter and bloodshed.
In short, Behery called on the Egyptian governmentand here the Vatican would do well to listennot to rely on Al Azhar to make any reforms, since if anything it has taken Egypt backwards.
Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, a Judith Friedman Rosen Writing Fellow at the Middle East Forum and a CBN News contributor. He is the author of Crucified Again: Exposing Islams New War on Christians (2013) and The Al Qaeda Reader (2007).
Simply put, Pope Francis is a stubborn old man who long ago took the wrong political road and never had the capacity for self reflection or the inclination to do the right thing. He suffers from dangerous delusions and has harmed real people.
If only he would waste all of his time and take a break from destruction of the Church.
Very well put.
Pope Francis’ ideology and political correctness have simply made him stupid.
It is daft Westerners, seeking to be ultimately “accepting” and politically correct, who gravitate towards the most radical elements of Islam as its voice.
I’m reminded of the debacle at Gitmo, after the falsehood about he Koran being flushed. “Infidel” Americans had to handle the Koran with gloves, all meals were completely halal and specially prepared, no menstruating women were allowed on base, etc...
In sum, WE made Gitmo into a radical madrassa the Taliban would be proud of.
Islam cannot be reformed.
It must be extirpated.
It is as evil as Nazism and must be made as unacceptable.
The ImPopester was installed to destroy the Church and prepare the flock for the slaughter.
Francis did NOT “waste his time.” He knew exactly what he was doing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.