Posted on 03/15/2017 6:00:24 PM PDT by marshmallow
A US circuit court in Georgia has ruled that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of sex, does not by that fact prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
In November 2016, a federal district court in Pennsylvania reached a different conclusion in a similar case. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has argued that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is a kind of sex discrimination.
11th Circuit: Title VII Does Not Bar Sexual Orientation Discrimination (Religion Clause)
Sexual “orientation” is a novelty of the mid-20th century which probably won’t make it to the 22nd.
There IS still some sanity in the federal judiciary....
We don’t all have to indulge the delusions of those who can’t accept their biology.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a big steaming legislative turd dropped on the US that effectively outlawed freedom of association.
This is correct. It’s been posted several times over the years here on FR, but always bears repeating.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a big steaming legislative turd dropped on the US that effectively outlawed freedom of association.
Yes, preach it brother! It needs to be repealed. It has been a disaster and a horror. It has almost killed our Republic.
” It needs to be repealed.”
Repeal is Phase 3. Phase 1 is to make it strong and effective.
Sexual Orientation is a behavior and a chosen “lifestyle” which mocks Reason and mocks God. There is no “natural right” to sodomize others since promoting Vice in a “Just Law” is unconstitutional. Our Constitution is based on Natural Law Theory which excludes evil, vile, dysfunctional use of others and self.
Sexual Orientation includes bestiality and pedophilia——and that is on purpose, since the end game has always been to groom and teach the children and normalize the pagan, Ba’al Rites of sodomy and baby-sacrifice (baby-killing and cannibalism). The NWO has to normalize vice in little children because as all great philosophers knew since Socrates, there is no possibility of freedom with people who embrace vice (outer controls). Only virtuous people can be free.
Like the boy harems of Afghanistan and the Spartans in Ancient Greece, taking 7 year olds away from their mothers and placing them with a “mentor” to teach fighting and and groom the boys for homosexuality (like Milo was) is the plan to create happy non-breeding slaves for the State.
Exactly. It is not innate, and there are plenty of "crossover" people that prove that. If it was a genetic trait, gay people would evolve from the species due to lack of procreation. Man + Man does not begat baby.
I wanted to share something shocking with both of you because it is informative and it increases awareness of how homosexuality is getting around the ‘problem’ they have with procreating.
I’ll say first that I don’t have all the answers but I have a good sense of the effects, and the effects are not good.
Also, I have gotten along with homosexuals socially and in business. But their lifestyle is not a topic we discuss although if we were part of the government or the military, I want them to declare their lifestyle so they are not vulnerable to blackmail or compromise.
Also I don’t use the word ‘gay’ for homosexuality.
That said, it is, in fact, true that homosexuals can procreate, just not in the manner that society thinks.
A homosexual woman is able to go to a sperm bank where a homosexual man has deposited a sample of his semen. Often the homosexual man is a friend of the homosexual woman. The woman is then able to be impregnated.
So yes, they can procreate and they, in fact, do procreate in this manner.
What’s worse, they can ‘attend Church’ with their partner and children and sometimes the priest is a woman lesbian. So now both of you can shudder at how bizarre that way of life can be. What you might not expect is that when you see one or both of them, and you don’t know what’s going on, you will not suspect much of anything strange at first because often they appear normal, they are well-dressed, behave well, blend in, and are otherwise seemingly good citizens. But that’s the outward appearance.
But the real downside is the effect on the children born into the world where a parent is homosexual and is often ‘married’ to another homosexual. Children are born 100% with genitalia that is either female or male, with rare, very rare cases of confused genitalia that is often corrected by surgery. As they grow up, even before puberty, they notice strange things and they feel different from their peers from natural homes.
Studies have been performed showing results that children raised in homosexual homes experience and develop psychological and social problems with incidence enormously larger than children from natural homes having a mother and a father.
This does not mean natural families have no problems, they do. What it means is a child is more at risk in a homosexual home.
This problem is not small.
Now that you know a little more. maybe you will be on the lookout for news stories of children at risk in this way. You will add to your knowledge over the years and be ready to share with friends, neighbors, and legislators on what you’ve learned and importantly why the information you carry is not biased.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.