Posted on 11/30/2016 6:28:38 PM PST by marshmallow
Gloria TV reports:
"Last Saturday, Father Peter Hans Kolvenbach died in Beirut, Lebanon. He was the Superior General of the Jesuits from 1983 to 2008. Kolvenbach allegedly wrote to the Vatican recommending that Jorge Mario Bergoglio not be made archbishop of Buenos Aires because he was emotionally unstable and temperamentally unreliable. John Paul II promoted him anyway, believing that liberal Jesuits were unduly prejudiced against Bergoglio because he had been unsympathetic to Liberation Theology.
Bad Relationship: As the Argentinean provincial of the Jesuits, Bergoglio did not form as warm a relationship with the superior general, Peter Hans Kolvenbach, as he had with his predecessor, Pedro Arrupe. Kolvenbach even intervened to unseat Bergoglio and spurned him on his trip to Argentina in 1988. Bergoglio was exiled to Cordoba and his followers sent abroad."
I addressed the Kolvenbach report here.
(Excerpt) Read more at freerepublic.com ...
Apologies for the defective link above.
Thanks for posting. BUMP!
Nah! He’s just a globalist commie. If he were American, he’d fit in well in the democratic party.
Wow.
Speechless...
Any news from the Baptists or Methodists?
Eric Jon Phelps calls him “Hans Klovenhoof”
So I guess that Pope John Paul II is the man to blame for Pope Francis’ elevation.
I was worried when Francis was being considered for Pope, but everyone said back then that he got in trouble with some of the bishops in South America for being strongly against Liberation Theology. I've been wonder about that ever since he revealed himself as Pope. Is he so unstable that he switched from right to left? Or was he faking it? He certainly seems to be far, far to the left now. JPII never would have backed him if he had behaved like this back then. Was this all part of a plot?
Yes.
Could someone in the know please explain to me what this is all about? Does not compute.....
The other option is that the other South American bishops were even more Marxist, and atheistic, than Francis.
The thought that they considered Francis to be too conservative is pretty scary. Maybe you are correct, and Francis was just a faux conservative - biding time to get a promotion.
A pox on the entire Jesuit Order.
Was this all part of a plot?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Would certainly be in keeping with the history of the Order.
Wouldn’t surprise me.
If Francis was such a mess, why didn't Kolvenbach dismiss him from the Jesuits?
I wouldn’t be surprised.
Sorry. This gives him an excuse. Heretic is as heretic does. It also lends credence that the Crisis is “only a Francis problem”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.