I was responding to the teachings in your post. That is not a hijack at all. If you need to block out critique, there is always the caucus designation. I know that fortress apologetics has its firm defenses. The Gospels write all about a gracious, humble man who dared to refute settled doctrines. He disturbed the religious order and understanding.
It's a crazy world out there. If the Messiah grew up believing in the trinity, he wouldn't recognize himself. If his neighbors, family, and friends believed likewise, they wouldn't recognize him either.
You write a lot of good things though, like the Messiah being the Law, the Law being love. He's going to show everybody how it is done. The Messianic light just doesn't fall in on any of the usual wavelengths, but there it is - like a burning bush that is never consumed.
Alright, Ezekiel, I shouldn’t have reproved you for commenting on the teaching I posted, it isn’t a hijacking, I am sorry I accused of that. The concept of the person of God is of necessity mysterious, no man knows the Father but the Son, and know man knows the Son but th e Father and whoever he reveals him to...(rough paraphrase of Matt 11.