Posted on 07/17/2015 4:18:06 PM PDT by markomalley
There is a certain kind of American who, when overseas or in the presence of foreignersespecially Western Europeansgoes out of his way to advertise that hes not at all like his ignorant and reactionary countrymen. Usually he does this preemptively. A well-timed joke about George W. Bush could do the trick. So could an ostentatious roll of the eyes at the sight of the fat Yankee tourists in their obnoxious yellow pants, baseball hats, and windbreakers.
The point of this signaling is to acknowledge the intense shame that goes along with being a default member of a detested class. There is probably a charitable term for this kind of behavior. The only one I can think of is self-loathing.
There are Catholics like this, too. Some of them are fallen from the faith. They no longer attend mass and enjoy throwing rhetorical stones at silly buggers like you and me who havent yet sussed the Churchs anti-modern stance on the pressing issues of the day. But a good many self-loathing Catholics arent like that. In fact, a fair number of them are members of the clergypriests, pastors, bishops, cardinals.
You know them. You heard a lot from them during the weeks after the Supreme Court issued its Obergefell decision inventing a constitutional right to same-sex marriage. Mostly they work for the Jesuit magazine America.
No issue brings out so much hatred from so many Catholics as homosexuality, they told you. God wants us to love. And not a twisted, crabbed, narrow tolerance, which often comes in the guise of condemnations, instructions and admonitions that try to masquerade as love, but actual love.
The bishops fight against gay marriage has been a waste of time and money, they said. Their fanatical opposition to the legalization of gay marriage has made young people look on the church as a bigoted institution with which they do not want to be associated.
Such statements are the Catholic equivalent of over-vigorously nodding your head in disgust as the French couple in the hotel bar relates the story of the Buick-sized steak they were served on their trip to New York. The quisling posture of submission affords the morally effete a sweet, though fleeting, moment of disassociation with the values they hold in contempt merely because they are familiar. It feels so good to sell your own people out.
The latest round of self-righteous lectures from these self-loathing Catholics comes courtesy of the undercover video of a Planned Parenthood official discussing the sale of body parts from aborted babies. Writing for America, Father Sam Sawyer, S.J., declares that the title of the videoPlanned Parenthood uses partial-birth abortion to sell baby partsis wildly misleading. Furthermore, selective editing of the video has simply reinforced, for many, the pro-choice narrative about pro-life activists: unscrupulous, dishonest players willing to do anything necessary in order to control and limit womens access to abortion.
This is a puzzling thing to say in light of the storm of outrage generated by the video. We have rarely seen such frank talk about the grisly procedures from which the highly-subsidized Planned Parenthood generates its enormous cash flow. Yet, bizarrely, among Father Sam Sawyers first impulses is to remind pro-life activists of the cartoonish way they are viewed by the other side, and to warn them that they are playing into that stereotype by by doing what exactly? By recording Planned Parenthoods senior director of medical research admitting that behind closed doors, the organizations executives have plotted to evade laws against trafficking in body parts?
Chiding pro-lifers for this video seems an altogether inappropriate response for a priest. Unless, of course, hes worried that his sophisticated, progressive friends might end up reading his piece and deciding hes one of those. In that case he might want to put a little distance between himself and the knuckle-dragging blobs of the Catholic pro-life movement whose twisted love of deceit and crabbed lack of scruples have brought such shame on the name of Jesus.
Father Sawyer actually called the video deeply unfair and seemed sympathetic to Nucatolas moving explanation of how she ended up focusing her practice as a physician on abortion. I forget: Does the catechism on life require that the abortionists motives should be considered before condemnation of the act?
Recall, if you will, what it was that turned so many stomachs.
Weve been very good at getting heart, lung, liver, because we know that, so Im not gonna crush that part, Im gonna basically crush below, Im gonna crush above, and Im gonna see if I can get it all intact, says Dr. Deborah Nucatola in the video. As she speaks, she stabs at a large salad and sips from a goblet of afternoon wine with the unmistakable sangfroid of someone who cant imagine suffering the disapprobation of the sophisticated class.
Its disgusting.
If the makers of the video erred at all, it was in slapping a sensational title onto their video in order to attract as many eyeballs as possible. Its the kind of thing the New York Post or the New Republic does every day. Chide them if necessary, but while you do, be sure to reiterateand celebrateCatholic teaching on the sanctity of innocent human life.
And try not to roll your eyes.
Don’t the Jesuits believe in “Soul annihilation” or some such non-sense...
Jesuits are not Catholics. They are not Christians.
They have gone over entirely to the dark side.
A warning to any parents considering sending their children to a Jesuit high school or college.
Jesuits are Catholics. Some famous Jesuits helped in World War II.
Just because the magazine isn’t up to par, does not mean that ALL Jesuits are bad.
We had the best Jesuit priest ever help with our Marriage Encounter group here.
You can even see his picture sometimes on the Sunday Canteen threads.
When confronted by a Jesuit, it is best to follow the example of Glinda and ask, “Are you a good Jesuit, or a bad Jesuit?”
Why isn’t this Catholic Caucus? For two days, we’ve had a thread about Caucus posts to keep out haters and yet here we have an interesting post that absolutely invites the haters in - rather than an inclusive discussion among Catholics. Do you really want to invite ridiculous photos of ossuaries and Dan Brown conspiracy theories?
I’m serious here; not trying to be snarky.
One- when I go to France and witness Americans obnoxiously throwing money at people refusing to use or even learn the smple word ‘merci’ I am disgusted. I don’t apologize. If that’s how Americans want to act they can.
But to compare them to devout Catholics? Pushy Americans overseas are like devout Catholics?
No
In fact the Jesuits I know apologize, when in a group of devout daily mass goers, claiming to ‘not being like those other jesuits’
bkmk
The Rev. James Martin is a Jesuit priest and a Modernist. All Modernists are heretics who twist the Catholic Faith into a personal product. Thus, Fr. Martin is a selfish Jesuit.
I have worked with Jesuits in Berkeley and SF and have found a mixed bag: some holy, some selfish, some just cruising. Sadly, a united Jesuit Order has the power to crush the abortion industry and the power is just wasted. Even JP II could not harness it. The Jesuit leaders yawned at JP II.
In order to be inoculated from the disease of Modernism, a person needs to attend mass on weekends, say the rosary daily, and study the Bible daily. The Lord has full power over every situation including the Jesuits.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.