Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: vladimir998

Ok...I stand corrected. But wouldn’t you say Chank Kai-Shek was king-like and Czar Nicolas was a Monarch?


35 posted on 07/14/2015 6:30:58 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Jan_Sobieski

The Communists had absolutely nothing to do with the abdication of Tsar (not Czar) Nicholas in March 1917, since they were mostly out of the country (e.g. Lenin in Switzerland and Trotsky in Brooklyn); and the government that the Communists violently overthrew 7 months later was the freely e=elected government that had been elected in April 1917.


39 posted on 07/14/2015 6:50:02 PM PDT by wildandcrazyrussian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

“Ok...I stand corrected. But wouldn’t you say Chank Kai-Shek was king-like and Czar Nicolas was a Monarch?”

Chiang Kai-shek was more of a generalissimo than anything else.

And yes, Czar Nicholas was a monarch, but he wasn’t overthrown by the Bolsheviks.

By the way, I have nothing against monarchy in itself.


40 posted on 07/14/2015 7:13:19 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson