[Jan_Sobieski]

So we are in agreement! You think the Bolshevik Revolution and Mao's takeover of China (both replacing Kings) were good! Everyone it entitled to their own opinion, but not all opinions are created equal.

By the way, you wont like Jesus Christ when He comes back then. He is coming back to rule and reign as King of Kings.

[DesertRhino]

Jesus isn’t going to sit in a castle and be anything like what you call a ‘king”. Its an insult and the highest sophistry to equate Jesus with these feudal A-holes.

And you might read a history book. The Chicoms overthrew the Chinese republic where Chang was the head of state. The last emperor abdicated long before that.

As for the Romanovs, they were absolute monarchs, and utterly ground their people into dust like serfs, before and during WWI.
Their monarchist games with the Kaiser, and with the family of Austria caused tens of millions to die.

Its very sad that the Bolsheviks won the day in the following civil war. But the Monarchs were that authors of all that misery. A strong argument is easy backed up that the entire war is the fault of monarchies. Without this bloody war, there would have been no exhausted Russian army in mutiny leading to revolt.

Explain to me how you get rid of a feudal system without use of force?

[DesertRhino]

And im fascinated by you. Who do you think was king of China in 1949?

[vladimir998]

“You think the Bolshevik Revolution and Mao’s takeover of China (both replacing Kings) were goood!”

Neither replaced a king. These did:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Provisional_Government

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_China_(1912%E2%80%9349)