Posted on 07/14/2015 9:31:31 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Thomas Jefferson once wrote, "If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it; he is obligated to do so."
Without question, it was this principle that a coalition of religious leaders had in mind, when 16 days in advance of the U. S. Supreme Court's decision, they stated in a Washington Post advertisement that they would not abide by a ruling that gives homosexuals a constitutional right to marriage.
The ad, which covered a full page, featured "key signers" such as David and Jason Benham, Ambassador Kenneth Blackwell, Alveda King, former U.S. House Speaker Tom Delay, Dr. James Dobson of Family Talk, Bishop E.W. Jackson, Bishop Harry Jackson, former Ambassador Alan Keyes, Penny Nance of Concerned Women of America, Rev. Frank Pavone of Priests for Life, Rev. Don Wildmon of the American Family Association, Mat Staver of Liberty Counsel, Rick Scarborough of Vision America and Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council.
These great Christian leaders unequivocally stated: "We will not honor any decision by the Supreme Court which will force us to violate a clear biblical understanding of marriage as solely the union of one man and one woman."
On the same day the egregious ruling came down from the High Court, the Rev. Franklin Graham expressed in an interview with "Fox and Friends Weekend," that he was concerned that serious bouts with persecution were imminent for Christians in the United States.
"I believe we are going to see persecution in this country. We've already seen many laws that have been passed that restrict our freedoms as Christians. I believe it's going to get worse … We do have a problem in this country and we are losing our religious freedom and we're losing it a little bit day by day," Graham said.
Graham said part of the solution is for Christians to get involved in politics. He said that some Christians need to run for office.
During the Oklahoma State Evangelism Conference in January, the son of the renowned evangelist, Billy Graham, opined:
"Who says we can't be in politics? The gays and lesbians are in politics. I can tell you that. All the anti-God people are in politics. They're there. Why shouldn't the church be there? Who says we can't speak up? Get involved."
Yet some Christians are still quite dismissive of political involvement, arguing it's futile trying to improve government when the Scriptures foretell persecution is inevitable for believers in the "last days" that we're living. They essentially contend we should expect world governments to get more and more anti-Christian. It's a view more pervasive than realized. If it's not outwardly stated, subconsciously it's in the mind of many Christians, anesthetizing, and even paralyzing them into inaction.
In his book, Politics: According to the Bible, Wayne Grudem addresses the dilemma this way of thinking presents for Christian activism, quite eloquently. He correctly argues from Scripture that no one can possibly know the time when Christ will return or when the events preceding the Lord's coming will occur.
Grudem writes, "What we do know is that while we have opportunity, God tells us not to give up preaching 'the whole counsel of God' (Acts 20:27) and doing 'good works' (Eph. 2:10) and loving our neighbors as ourselves (Matt. 22:39). That means we should go on trying to influence governments for good as long as we are able to do so."
He continues, "If all the Christians who influenced governments for good in previous centuries had just given up and said, 'Persecution is coming and governments will become more evil, or there is nothing we can do,' then none of those good changes in laws would have come about. There would still be human sacrifice and burning widows alive and slavery and racial discrimination protected by law. That mentality would have been a defeatist, fatalistic attitude, and it would have led Christians to disobey many of God's commands for how we are to live our lives during the present age. Instead of giving in to such a hopeless attitude, courageous Christians in previous generations sought to do good for others and for governments, and God often blessed their efforts."
Todd Starnes with Fox Nation recently wrote, "The Supreme Court's decision means gay rights now trump religious liberty. And if you think the cultural purging of the Southern States has been breathtaking, wait until you see what LGBT activists are about to unleash on American Christians."
Starnes' and Graham's warning, the pledge to disobey the Supreme Court's ruling on gay marriage by dozens of national religious leaders, are neither a hyperbolic response or a form of paranoia, but instead an honest assessment of the kind of treatment many Christians can anticipate as a result of the ruling by five rogue judges.
One only needs to look north to Canada where gay marriage has been legal since 2005 and see that there have already been hundreds of legal proceedings against the critics and opponents of same-sex marriage. Churches in Canada have come under attack. The same is true for followers of Christ in some other countries where sexual freedom has supplanted religious freedom. Moreover, we're beginning to see the tip of the iceberg in states where same-sex marriage was legal before the SCOTUS ruling – bakers, florists, photographers and innkeepers legally punished for not participating in same sex ceremonies.
Barry Lynn, head of Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, recently announced his organization's commitment to "aggressively" combat any state or federal legislation, or court rulings that would seek to protect religious objectors to same sex marriage.
Civil disobedience is not something Christians in the United States have ever had to use often. We've always been abundantly blessed with religious liberty. Nevertheless, for obvious reasons this is changing and we're about to learn how to humbly, prayerfully, wisely, nonviolently, and dutifully resist unjust law.
If we're not willing to do this, then we're going to lose everything. If we're not willing to do this, and Christ delays His second coming, then our children and children's children will not enjoy the blessings of liberty most of us have taken for granted all of our lives. If we are not willing to do this, we'll miss an unprecedented opportunity our sacrifices and sufferings will provide for advancing the kingdom of God in ways we never dreamed possible.
"If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it; he is obligated to do so."
-- Dr. Mark Creech is executive director of the Raleigh-based Christian Action League of North Carolina, Inc. He also serves as president of the American Council on Alcohol Problems.
What can be said?
Lock and load, baby.
Well, for sure this new ‘law’ will sort the actual Christians from the Christmas and Easter variety. In this maybe it’s a good thing.
Be prepared for much more than passive resistance.
Liberals are slime, and will use force.
We can and must be prepared to return it with interest.
Judges/etc have homes and addresses.
Just sayin’.
Not, of course, that I advocate any actions...but I can most certainly predict what is to come.
There are many more of than there are of them. They and their corrupt legal system cannot cope with will come should we will it.
Fight back but don’t be a noob. There is a tendency by a lot of Christians to throw themselves under the bus, this is just pride. Christians need to be smart, they need to remember that the gates of help will not prevail and that nobody carries their gates into battle.
Paging (IRS 501-C3 tax exempt) Rev. Franklin Graham ... you have a call on the Hotel’s red courtsey phone in the lobby ...
***sigh*** darned autocorrect, hell, not help...
Here is what I do not understand.
I see many, many pastors and others say that we are making too big a deal of all this. That the world will do what they want and we shouldn’t try to impose our standards on the world. And that, “This is not a Christian nation, but a nation with many Christians in it.”
All this is to suggest that we should just go about our business and merely try to pick up the pieces from the damage that will naturally result from following such ungodly practices. Moreover, we should not say anything (or much) as this would be judgmental and we should merely love others and be welcoming to them so as enable the sharing of the gospel with them.
So, is the church supposed to be salt and light to a dying world, or is the church supposed to be a passive sanctuary to those who may seek spiritual redemption? In a world increasingly hostile and hard of heart and unwilling to openly hear or accept the gospel, being a passive sanctuary seems like a lazy, easy-way-out position. But again, I see so many leaders who seem to advocate a flaccid position that I think many in the church are both confused and have basically recoiled from issue engagement.
ping
I strenuously disagree with the framing of this situation as Christians practicing civil disobedience.
Adhering to the laws of nature and nature’s God and the Constitution is civil obedience.
It is the Left and their enablers who are acting contrary to the law, not us, and everybody should know that.
I am not sure that quote is correct. See Source:
“This quotation has not been found in Thomas Jefferson’s papers....”
...closer to what MLK Jr said
http://www.monticello.org/site/jefferson/if-law-unjustquotation
Well once more, do Christians have a mandate (prior to the return of Jesus) to take the reins of countries. There is a good theological argument that the answer is no.
I think you have (whether wittingly or not) set up a strawman. There is nothing wrong with giving advice. The “passive sanctuary” would sin by not evangelizing.
... I’d also add that that does not mean Christians have no PERMISSION to bring influence to bear in government structures where they can literally be part of the body politic; but even that shouldn’t go beyond the Noahide laws. It would be out of biblical bounds to try to create a “Churchoslovakia.”
Still, first things first. If Christians seem to be lacking power, the logical first place to go is their own personal devotion to the powerful Lord. And it should primarily be evangelism centered, only secondarily politically involved. Saving grace always trumps common grace in importance.
... Basically, the gospel mandate trumps any “make the nations nice” (with salt and light or otherwise) mandate. There is a deep danger in presenting Christianity to the world as if it were a great political plan. It will cheapen the gospel by providing a false alternative to it. If people think they can use “Oh, I’m American” as an answer to “Do you know Jesus the Lord” then they are in spiritual trouble.
I wonder if posting a legalise boilerplate type of notice in the bulletin and by the door in the spirit of those ones that come up on TV about “sensitive viewers may want to leave the room” would be enough to avoid the people who sue because they are offended? Children already get sent out of the room before the sermon begins. This might even be a selling point to a world sick to the gills with political correctness.
While I may more often than not argue with God in the sense of Israel’s meaning, I will never surrender God’s and The Bible’s fundamental precepts of holiness, and will fight with every practical means at my disposal against those who would.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.