To: StormPrepper
Wikipedia is NOT a scholarly source.
44 posted on
02/09/2015 9:42:17 AM PST by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo....Sum Pro Vita - Modified Descartes)
To: SumProVita
For the particular allegations raised, is it true or not?
49 posted on
02/09/2015 9:58:02 AM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: SumProVita
“Wikipedia is NOT a scholarly source.”
Attacking the messenger is a logical fallacy.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson