Mormons just accepted queers, so could “BA! Himbuggery!” be more what you meant?
I am not Mormon, either. The LDS command authority seeminglywnet fromthe California effort to stop gay marriage(very successfully) to backing down under Obama to the point of “Accept the Queer”, but not “queer acts” - most difficult when the behavior defines the queer.
The results of that decision are interesting to contemplate, as the Mormons are mostly conservative Republicans(not RINO types) and queers usually are Leftists.
Any Mormon Church has a Bishop who is far better able to advise you on the specifics. I just have a couple of friends who are Mormon and we talk politics and theology occasionally.
I’ll offer one example...
The LDS accepting homosexual Scouts was essential in the BSA’s move to making the change in opening up membership regardless of “preference or orientation” (cogitate on that for a minute, words mean things) last year.
In fact, the National President (a mormon) travelled to SLC just a couple of weeks before the National Convention where the so-called “delegates” from around the country were to vote on the topic and secured their consent.
The point of the matter is that the LDS have a massive number of Scouts on record, but on record only. Yet, they still register (pay) the BSA for any and all youth on their membership rosters...the BSA gets a lot of “free” $$ from SLC, so SLC gets a lot of influence.
Our Troop was kicked out of our Charter Organization (evangelical church) because of our association with the BSA and their policy.
Yet, the mormons have endorsed the policy by supporting and maintaining Troops...IOW, they endorsed not only homosexuality, but LGBTQ in general. As I said above, words mean things.