1 posted on
09/27/2014 1:10:15 PM PDT by
NYer
To: Tax-chick; GregB; Berlin_Freeper; SumProVita; narses; bboop; SevenofNine; Ronaldus Magnus; tiki; ...
You know what happens when government intervenes, ping!
2 posted on
09/27/2014 1:10:45 PM PDT by
NYer
("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
To: NYer
He who has ears, let him hear...
3 posted on
09/27/2014 1:12:44 PM PDT by
chajin
("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
To: NYer
I vote food.
The biofuels wreck your car’s engine. Don’t use them.
4 posted on
09/27/2014 1:16:46 PM PDT by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: NYer
Environmentalists ARE behind the movement to reduce the World population are they not? As they are then they have not one single praiseworthy intention in any stated goal they proffer.
Environmentalists have contributed more to the demise of this Nation, and the World than any other entity.
5 posted on
09/27/2014 1:19:47 PM PDT by
rockinqsranch
((Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.))
To: NYer
7 posted on
09/27/2014 1:23:22 PM PDT by
Brother Cracker
(You are more likely to find krugerrands in a Cracker Jack box than 22 ammo at Wal-Mart)
To: NYer
“There is a tendency for environmentalists of our time to think very narrowly about their issues. “
So narrowly that they view a hyperfire as being more environmentally friendly than doing controlled burns to clear out dead wood.
So you end up with sterilized dirt due to the higher temps cause by the hyperfires, and nothing grows.
But it’s “natural” that way.
8 posted on
09/27/2014 1:24:01 PM PDT by
Darksheare
(People who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
To: NYer
I'm no fan of the economics of corn ethanol, but I have absolutely no issue with using a substance for fuel that can otherwise be used as food, nor vice versa.
For thousands of years, olive oil lit the night, so what?
9 posted on
09/27/2014 1:25:19 PM PDT by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: NYer
What I don’t understand is how this can be considered a dependable form of alternative energy. Any number of weather factors could cause a reduction or destruction of the corn being used for ethanol, and then we are in even worse shape.
To: NYer
Corn is for bread and likker, not ethanol
14 posted on
09/27/2014 1:31:20 PM PDT by
GreyFriar
(Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
To: NYer
Strongly agree. The very idea of giving subsidies towards the business of burning foodstuffs as fuel in gas-tanks (when there is plenty of non-edible fuel already) ... it’s a highly perverse incentive with perverse and damaging results to the price of food for human beings who need to eat it.
19 posted on
09/27/2014 1:52:40 PM PDT by
Smashing_Pundit
(http://www.smashingpundit.com)
To: NYer
29 posted on
09/27/2014 3:18:06 PM PDT by
hadaclueonce
(Because Brawndo's got electrolytes. Because Ethanol has Big Corn Lobby)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
