Carter: “ . . . the very top religious crime against women are abortions that happen because the fetus is female. He said that amounts to tens of millions of “girls missing because they were murdered.” “
He said this in the article because he felt it had religious elements that drive the anti-female abortion selection he speaks of. What a nitwit - on so many levels.
Does he realize it is largely faith-based resistance to abortion in the first place?
Does he grasp that it is women killing women in his example?
Does he care that it is his party that worships the slaughter of innocents?
Because killing a baby of either sex is still killing babies, does he feel that killing a male baby is less a crime?
I could go on and on about this apostate fool but I have real work to do.
Have a great day and be glad that you weren’t born Jimmy Carter.
“Because killing a baby of either sex is still killing babies, does he feel that killing a male baby is less a crime?”
Bingo. Carter’s used of the example of female babies being killed because they are female - as an example of injustice. This is a purely political statement with no common sense to it. What on earth is he implying? He does sound a bit like Obama and Holder - who see everything through group-think. So, for instance, the deaths of lots and lots of female babies is abhorrent, but the deaths of some baby boys through abortions is not so bad at all. This is idiotic thinking and sounds a bit schizophrenic.
Abortions kill babies who are God’s creation. They have souls.