Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

The consent rebuttal to the ‘animal marriage’ prospect is laughable. Animals do not need to give consent for anything. They are property. If animals had to consent before things were done to them, we’d all be vegans.


5 posted on 11/19/2013 3:31:42 PM PST by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Viennacon

The harm is when Doctors start saying that a sexual attraction to animals is a psychological condition, the same for pedophilia. You know kind of what they did for transgenders, who now can go into any bathroom they choose in our children’s schools, Gym’s, other facilities. They are now a protected class.

You all remember when the Gays in Texas said “All we want is for you to stay out of our bedroom” because Sodomy was against the law in Texas? Well that was decades ago, fast forward, now you have LGBT’s in our class-rooms,on our School boards, pushing their “reading” material onto our children.


10 posted on 11/19/2013 3:44:16 PM PST by Engedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Viennacon

What’s the harm in a mother marrying her son, or a brother marrying his sister? What’s the harm with a 12 year old marrying a 60 year old? What’s the harm with 4 people all married to each other in a group marriage? What’s the harm with homosexual marriage?

With all these scenarios, marriage becomes meaningless.


12 posted on 11/19/2013 3:49:14 PM PST by Flavious_Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson