Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom
Personally, I think that the fact that modern premillenial dispensationalism is vastly different from the historic premillenial chiliasm that some early Church Fathers held discounts Darby's anomalous teachings. Amillenialism was also well-represented by the early Church Fathers, even from the time of Justin Martyr in the 100s AD--and I tend to view postmillenialism as a close relative of amillenialism.

But at the same time, I agree with Justin Martyr when he wrote, "I and many others are of this opinion [premillennialism], and [believe] that such will take place, as you assuredly are aware; but, on the other hand, I signified to you that many who belong to the pure and pious faith, and are true Christians, think otherwise."

69 posted on 06/22/2013 10:11:39 AM PDT by The Grammarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: The Grammarian

The church had problems grasping the meaning of events from the first. How many times did Jesus need to rebuke overly literal minded followers, yet Jesus did it in love, never damning them for their weak or misguided faith. If you’re a “Protestant” then you already know how quickly the best church can get into serious trouble. It really is a monument to God, and not to men. I believe Darby probably did catch some things that earlier believers missed, and because of the Holy Spirit and His timing. To me it seems like a film that is slowly, slowly developing a full picture. In its intermediate states it may look chaotic. But the picture is always there, just awaiting its final expression.


73 posted on 06/22/2013 10:18:11 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Whatever promise that God has made, in Jesus it is yes. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson