Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

I went to the NCCS-BSA website and found the letter. It is very carefully worded, and I suppose does not directly oppose Catholic teaching on the issue.

It’s a pdf file, unfortunately, but here it is:

http://nccs-bsa.org/comment/Response-EPM-130529-v2.pdf

As he says, no sexual activity is encouraged in the Scouts, gay OR straight. Still, I think this is dumb, because you know the libs are going to use this to push this agenda.

And it’s quite right to say that there will be no bullying. But “anti-bullying” is being used by the PC Police to force people to say that gay is good—or you’re a bully for hurting their feelings.

Regretably, a carefully worded letter like this WILL be misinterpreted. And I’m afraid that may be what the writer intends. He is very careful not to go against Christian teaching, BUT he is effectively laying back and encouraging others to do so.


9 posted on 06/04/2013 8:42:14 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero

Yeah, that’s definitely true.


11 posted on 06/04/2013 8:43:23 AM PDT by Pyro7480 (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

To me this is infuriating. The Church seems unwilling to take a definite stand on the push to legitimize gay sex. Maybe I am being paranoid, but it seems that the council the Church gives is divided. It keeps giving mixed signals. On the one hand, the doctrine is clear. On the other hand, they don’t act as if it were.


24 posted on 06/04/2013 9:09:57 AM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

Well put.

The letter is using a narrow legalistic interpretation to conclude ‘no problem, no violation’, while in fact the big picture is moving toward accommodation of the homosexual lifestyle and away from biblical proscription of the abomination. As you correctly point out, the letter is passively facilitating that which any real Christian should be actively and openly opposing.


31 posted on 06/04/2013 9:36:20 AM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by Nature, not Nurture™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero
There's that damned ambiguity again.

The traditional Scout position on sexuality was, in effect, "Don't Ask/ Don't Tell," --- and this is correct. If a boy doesn't bring up sexuality as an issue, there's no way to tell if he gets horny thoughts about Justin Bieber, Katy Perry, Jack the Middle School Swim Coach or Mrs. Thompson the 8th Grade Music teacher. Sexuality doesn't intrude, and there's no problem.

The glitch in the policy is that it makes it OK to "Come Out to the Scouts" --- what a catchy slogan for the next phase of the LGBT strategy.

Come out --- adopt it as your very identity --- demand your self-expressive rights (backed by the ACLU) and if somebody doesn't like it, they face the repercussions.

Then as the "out-and-proud" Eagle Scouts are trained for leadership positions, does anybody, anybody think they'll get the boot on their 18th birtday?

BSA morphs into Gay-Straight Alliance.

Stupid NCCS.

49 posted on 06/04/2013 2:51:08 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (On my honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero
because you know the libs are going to use this to push this agenda

The day the BSA caved they were already calling for homosexual Scout leaders.

59 posted on 06/04/2013 10:29:49 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson