To: GeronL
Naomi and Ruth were mother-in-law and daughter-in-law, and THIS is the Biblical pair that this “church” highlights in a (presumably) lesbian marriage?! Shouldn't that tell them that there are no romantic female couples in the Bible and that there's a very good reason for that?
4 posted on
04/24/2013 1:22:44 PM PDT by
utahagen
To: utahagen
6 posted on
04/24/2013 1:27:28 PM PDT by
GeronL
(http://asspos.blogspot.com)
To: utahagen
I imagine the Book of Ruth was chosen because it indicates that oral sex outside of marriage isn’t wrong. In fact, it is the quickest way to get a husband.
10 posted on
04/24/2013 1:50:27 PM PDT by
stop_fascism
(Love your country, but never trust its government - R.A. Heinlein)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson