Skip to comments.A Boy's Life with Unisex Scouts
Posted on 04/23/2013 10:00:06 AM PDT by newheart
The Boy Scouts are en route to holding that there is nothing to being a boy, and nothing to the boys becoming a man; they might as well be the Unisex Scouts, as they are in Canada, where the scouting movement has collapsed.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepublicdiscourse.com ...
Well, I am sure collapse is the overall goal.
Like marriage. They want to destroy that too.
They want to destroy anything that is good.
Well, as Tom Lehrer famously sang:
Be prepared! and be careful not to do
Your good deeds when there’s no one watching you.
If you’re looking for adventure of a
New and different kind,
And you come across a girl scout who is
Don’t be nervous, don’t be flustered, don’t be scared.
Well, I HAD heard that a pig is a rat is a boy is a dog....
OTOH, I’d also heard that boys were made of snips and snails and puppy dog tails....
If they allow homosexuals in the boy scouts they may as well shut down-—It’s over.
“Boy scouting” is becoming “scouting for boys”.
Who could have seen that coming?
Since the perverts have forced the institution to "join" them, I will have nothing to do with them in any form. Guess they'll just have to exist as another branch of the dystopic government. Sort of another welfare program for the indolent pervs, like PBS.
Good luck to them.
You are right. In addition, the Sodomites are waiting for untrammeled access to their created 12 year old pleasure boys. Once the Sodomites obtain their goal of lowering the age of consent the harvest will begin.
There are some things that you’re not old enough to understand just yet.Atticus Finch
Esolen is simply the best, the absolute best, Christian traditionalist writer available today. This is one of his all-time best pieces. It defines manliness superbly. And it shows, sadly, the abyss into which we are descending.
Every father and every mother should read this.
Thank you for posting this.
Definitely Top Ten.
My question is what good can come of it? The only thing I can think would be that perhaps providing an opportunity for some young forming minds to see that being a young man with male interests can be enjoyable. Perhaps a rare opportunity for many of them.
Sad. That we have reached the point where this view of things must be explained.
I am opposed to the BSA's apparent decision. I have a son who is 6 months to a year away from becoming an Eagle Scout, and it is disturbing to see the organization go this direction.
On the other hand, just maybe, it might be that a kid who thinks he might be homosexual could change his mind after being around real boys. I'm inclined to think that the question of same sex attraction comes more out of ambivalence rather than actual desire, until the propensity is reinforced through conditioning.
So, as long as homosexual leadership is prohibited, there may be some good come from it. But I suspect that will go by the wayside after the first "homosexual" Eagle Scout reaches age 18 and demands to be part of leadership.
Do not believe this is done deal. There is a good chance, a very good chance that the resolution will not pass. There is still time to effect the voters. If you are in the BSA, the time to act is NOW. Find out who represents your District and stay on them to vote NO.
The Gaystapo’s goal is to eliminate the BSA and any ther organization that molds boys to become real men. It won’t stop with he BSA.
Thank you. That is my point exactly. And I also share your concern. For any good to come of this exceptional leadership and a healthy amount of prayer will be required. And I expect one of the keys to leadership will be to instill a sense of all inclusivness among all of the youngsters.
Amazing! You must have let that stew inside for decades I bet. ;^)
Of course. And replace the natural family with the state.
That collapse takes a generation (which they have had) to erase concepts in small children-—it is why they removed words like “wife” and “husband” decades ago-—to normalize the idea of homosexual marriage. “Spouse” was injected so they can make men and women interchangeable to small children (Marxism). Same way they made “homosexual marriage” a rational concept to the young-—by programming that word everywhere on TV, in books, in news and especially in classrooms with agitprop like “Heather has two Mommies” and families comes in all shapes. This is a scientific lie and irrational but forced as truth to young children which twists any Logic that, by nature, they would get in real life situations that weren’t abusive or traumatized.
Repetitiion of ideas-—no matter how absurd like the oxymoron “homosexual” marriage which defiles the definition and twists the meaning to absurd lengths-—become “normal” when children are exposed to these “ideas” when forming their worldview in early childhood. Emotions make it “good” and Reason is killed. They become ideologues-—conditioned NOT to think.
Marxists understood since before Wittgenstein, that he who controls the “words” will control the culture and shape all perceptions in the masses. It is why they took control over the media and all major publications in the 30’s.
It is why zero wants three year olds in “day” care-—away from loving parental supervision (Christian worldview) which creates the ability to “Trust” in adults so that healthy long-term relationships (maturity) will occur.
Marxism needs everyone to distrust each other and hate other groups-—so all “education” does, since the Fabian John Dewey took over the schools, is label children-—group them-—to create disunity and suspicion because all immature (by age) children will “hate” differences because of the “herd instinct” in all children by nature. They like to be around others who are like themselves. It validates their conceptions of self. They can be “conditioned” in the Pavlovian sense-—to “think” anything is “Good” when they are under the age of Reason—7 and even then-—peer pressure can be used to make children “flip” and discard Christian Ethics for Satanic ethics of sodomy-—by using emotional coercion by the curricula used by “facilitators” in the classroom. These people are “change agents” who are programmed to destroy Christian Virtue in children (Charlotte Iserbyt/ BK Eakman.
What is learned in the “plastic” years of childhood becomes embedded-—like the little harem boys in Afghanistan-—they will never be able to “think” with Reason and Logic-—for their powerful emotions are tied to irrational concepts. As adults-—they can not “think” like a Christian. It is impossible. They can not “look” at men in the same way a Christian will look at men....their emotions of lust will be incited.
This is why it is diabolical to sexualize and destroy the innocence of children—understood by Christians and in Western Civ since Rousseau....any Sex Ed programs will destroy the normal sexual development of children—and fixate them in an immature stage....they will never “mature” unless extreme intervention occurs-—because their emotions are embedded with concepts.
No Fault divorce was created to get women in the workforce—away from children and forming their worldview. Cultural Marxists know that the transmission of “culture” is done by the loving family—but that creates independent, principled people who have a support system against the tyranny of the State——the ideology of parents will prevail unless the State gets them away from the parents.
To destroy the family, is to destroy the individual and support system against tyranny. Isolate and you get no resistance to tyranny.
That is why Germany does not allow “homeschooling”. They want the “goose steppers”. They understand child psychology and the importance of “shaping plastic minds”.
I've tried to explain to supporters that they would not like a gym teacher watching their son or daughter in the shower if they knew they were homosexual, but they have become so conditioned to this evil, they cannot even admit they wouldn't sacrifice their own child on Satan's alter. It's no different than homosexual pedophile priests, or NAMBLA, or John Wayne Gacey.
If you were homosexual, what motivation would you have to want to spend all your time with boy children? How many boys will be raped before we simpletons figure out that it's not healthy to place your child in a tent with a grown man that wants to rape him? I, as a heterosexual, would not be allowed to have sleep overs with your daughter, so why place your son in that position?
IMO, there will come a time, decades from now, where children adopted by homosexuals, will recount their abuse for years with no recourse. All you have to do to know something is wrong is notice the sex of their adoptee's . Men adopt boys and lesbian's adopt girls. Will we gasp when we find out about their abuse?
Well said - my thoughts exactly. Let’s hope for the best.
I expect that by that time people will be so conditioned to abuse at all levels that they will hardly blink an eye. Kind of like what the muzzies do with their women now. It is so accepted that they just take if for granted. I do believe the responses here substantiate your position that the future holds a great deal of disappointment for many.
Absolutely no good will come of this.
The homos activists will now make sure that the BSA do not just “allow” homosexuals, they will have to celebrate and promote homsexualism. And the very next step - already written into their playbook - is homo scout leaders. After, all the little faggots need grown up faggots for role models.
Mark my words.
See my comment above.
Hoping for the best in many circumstances neutering any effective defense.
This is nothing short of utter disaster and the only sane thing to do is to start another similar organization with no sexual pervets allowed.
With no big money board of directors. Maybe faith based, with various churches and religions all on board. Either that or small local groups that can meet together regularly for camp outs and stuff.
The combination of “homosexuals” and “teenage/adolesent boys” is a recipe for absolute hell.
QUEERING OF THE BOY SCOUTS
Is there an American Heritage Boys?
If not, I bet there will be one quite soon!
St. Geroge, patron of the Boy Scouts, please pray for them.
Those pictures of Reagan remind of the pictures of Bush whacking the brush out on his property.
I thought you were the Scouts pingmaster. My mistake?
Pedo Scouts and Commie Scouts and who knows what else