Skip to comments.A Dan Brown Good Friday from the BBC
Posted on 04/01/2013 6:34:52 AM PDT by NYer
What a difference a decade makes. In 2002 the BBC broadcast a documentary on the Virgin Mary characterizing her “as a poor and downtrodden girl, who might have conceived Jesus as a result of being raped.” This Life of Brian view of the birth of Jesus prompted outrage - letters, editorials, statements from church leaders leaders condemning the broadcast.
A documentary broadcast on Good Friday by the BBC entitled “The Mystery of Mary Magdalene” that suggests Mary Magdalene and Jesus were sexual partners has provoked a complaint from a retired bishop but little else. The Telegraph reports:
The Rt Rev Michael Nazir-Ali, the former bishop of Rochester, said the programme, presented by Melvyn Bragg would be hugely offensive to devout Christians because it amounted to the sexualisation of Christ. He said it was all the more upsetting because it is being screened at midday on Good Friday the moment the Bible says Jesus was put on the cross.
The article notes:
Lord Bragg, who describes himself as no longer a believer, argues that Marys close relationship with Jesus was effectively airbrushed out of the accepted Biblical account by misogynist Romans. He points to a series of ancient writings known as the Gnostic Gospels which were not included in the agreed list of books which became the New Testament. They include references to Mary being kissed on the mouth by Jesus, being his favourite and even, as one passage suggests, his wife.
Writing in the Telegraph last week, Bragg argued Mary Magdalene:
was acknowledged by other disciples as his favourite and there is one taunting scrap of record which may well lead to the conclusion that she was his wife.
Which leads Bragg to the conclusion:
What then? What then for the celibacy which has led the organised Church into so many abuses and crimes and distorted lives?
Pretty clear were Bragg t is going with all this. Bishop Nazir-Ali, the Telegraph reported, accused the BBC of being deliberately provocative and noted that they would not treat Islam in the same way.
Why is the BBC doing this on Good Friday and why is it doing it in such a provocative way. … There will be huge offence, there must be some way of putting the other point of view across.
Maybe it is true that Mary Magdalene was married to Jesus and emigrated to the South of France where her offspring founded the Merovingian Dynasty. Perhaps the Priory of Zion, Illuminati, Rosicrucians, Knights Templar and Freemasons really do rule the world? Or maybe this is a ploy to hype ratings for a film that would otherwise disappear into the limbo of the History Channel — immediately after Ancient Aliens. As an aside, it would be interesting to see a documentary on Gnosticism that discusses and explores the tenets of this faith and its influences on modern thinking.
Bishop Nazir-Ali’s complaints are on point. The BBC would no more broadcast a show that questions the historical basis of Islam at the start of Ramadan than it would surrendered its license fees. These sorts of stories are not confined to the BBC. Easter and Christmas bring all sorts of silly stories to the pages of American newspapers and magazines. But it comes amidst a change in British religious attitudes toward religion. The former Archbishop of Canterbury Lord Carey has denounced the Conservative government of Prime Minister David Cameron for deliberately alienating British Christians by its strident secularism and support for gay marriage. David Cameron is either a very poor politician, or he believes the Conservative Party will suffer no electoral consequences for dumping it traditional electoral base.
It very well may be that after 30 years of anti-Christian bias from the BCC there is not much the Corporation can do anymore to shock television viewers. I know I’m tired of these silly stories and wonder if you are too?
You could argue that anti-Christians are only entertaining themselves. With Thursday, Friday, Saturday and Sunday church services, I had no time to read trash, and the radio is only my alarm clock. TV? Surely you jest!
Judging from the majority of catholic freepers in this forum posted throughout Holy Week, I'm guessing the same is true for them.
They are fools who fool themselves; no need for Satan to give them hints or help; they condemn themselves. They are to be greatly pitied.
It has enabled people with Faith to more easily weed out the impostors.
Yes, he did. It was difficult to watch, in it's brutality, but I HAD to watch it, because Jesus suffered and died for me.
I understand, but respectfully disagree. It was just another Hollywood entertainment vehicle product. Yes, that’s how the industry refers to them.
And I also respectfully disagree.
Hollywood wanted nothing to do with Mel's movie. They maligned it. They called it anti-Semitic. No one would help him market it, which is an expensive venture in itself. They highly questioned his use of original languages and his use of dramatic license. And yet he produced the most authentic presentation of the Passion to date.
For anyone who has taken the time to truly meditate on the Passion of Jesus, Mel's work comes the closest to being there.
Hollywood can not compete with that.
I got you. Nevertheless, my point was and is to remember that a movie does not equal and should not be confused with a church service.