[Eagle of Liberty]

But willard doesn’t even rise to that standard. And innocent lives aren’t mine to bargain with in the first place.

So it is acceptable for Obama, a man who WOULD NOT protect even a born alive infant, to get another four years. Got it.

[RKBA Democrat]

Your reply is predictable and a standard willardite talking point. Selecting the lesser evil is still selecting evil. All the moreso when there are other candidates running on second party tickets who aren’t pro abortion.

But since you seem to think that selecting the lesser pro-abortion candidate is a morally laudable act… let’s put some numbers to it. How many abortions are acceptable to you as a “compromise.” Let’s not talk in platitudes. Let’s pick a number. Is it 10,000? 100,000? A few million?

How much of the blood of the innocents is a “fair” price to pay so we can elect someone with an “R” after their name?