Thanks for the correction. I am so with you. Let's get our pitchforks!!
Command us, Oh Colofornian!!
Posted on 06/09/2011 8:31:18 AM PDT by Colofornian
Last week marked the one-year anniversary of the quiet removal of Bruce R. McConkie’s compendium Mormon Doctrine from Deseret booktores. All references to it had already been expunged from the Gospel Principles manual brought back into use for priesthood and Relief Society in 2010. It is no longer officially recognized by the Church.
Like many Mormons, I have some personal history with this book. When I was baptized into the LDS Church in 1993, the father of a friend gave me a copy, carefully inscribed to congratulate me on this momentous step. It looked like a helpful resource with its A to Z organization and comprehensive explanations. I was pleased to have it.
But then a friend quietly took me aside, looking fairly constipated with anxiety.
“I know you, and I know you’re actually going to read that book,” she told me. “So I wanted to tell you that just because it is called Mormon Doctrine, and it was written by a general authority, doesn’t mean that everything in it is really what the Church teaches now. If you have any questions about anything, anything at all, just come and ask me.”
This was confusing. This hyper-orthodox Molly Mormon friend was telling me, in her gentle Utah woman’s voice, that a Church general authority was not quite trustworthy as a source of information about the Church. Interesting.
Boy, was she ever right. When I read the book I found numerous passages I considered offensive, and others that seemed flat-out wrong in their interpretation of the Bible. I was grateful that she had taken the time to warn me and to teach me a valuable lesson: just because something has the veneer of authority does not make it authoritative or true.
I was very glad to hear the news a year ago that the Church had finally begun to officially disassociate itself with the book. Yet I still worry that the book lives on like that stubborn, garrulous old great-uncle you try to avoid at family reunions. It’s given enduring legitimacy to McConkie’s racism, sexism, and strange interpretations of the Gospel. (Check out a first edition to see his rant about psychology as a tool of the devil. It’s seriously trippy stuff. That was later removed, along with many other things.)
It’s not like various leaders of the Church haven’t tried their best to downplay the reliability of this book. When it was first published in 1958, its appearance was news to the prophet, David O. McKay, because McConkie – then just a member of the Council of the Seventy – hadn’t bothered to tell the First Presidency his plans to publish a book claiming to be an encyclopedia of Mormon doctrine. Whoops. McKay and two other apostles (including Marion Romney, Mitt’s dad’s cousin) spent over a year studying the book and compiling a report of the – wait for it – 1,067 corrections that needed to be made. The First Presidency ultimately recommended that the book not be given a second edition at all; it was too full of errors and had been “a source of concern to the Brethren ever since it was published.”
But the Mormon people apparently loved it, and six years later McConkie lobbied the ailing prophet for a second edition. It is not clear that McKay ever authorized it to be published under Church auspices, but McConkie moved forward anyway. (The McConkie family disputes this last claim, and if documents are added to the historical record that demonstrate McKay’s approval of the project, I will stand corrected. I have not yet seen any such evidence.)
Whether the second edition was authorized or not, the book’s success is history. It was a top backlist performer for Deseret for half a century, even after the Church tried several years ago to supplant Mormon Doctrine’s monopoly on the easy-to-use dictionary format with the handy (and free!) little A-Z reference book True to the Faith. It helped some, but not entirely.
There will probably never be an official repudiation of the book. It’s not seen as good form for general authorities to rebuke one another; they’re much too nice for that nowadays. But at times it would save us all a lot of anguish if they would just stand up in General Conference and shout, “Elder so-and-so, your book was full of crap!” This kind of thing was done routinely in Joseph Smith’s day. Then he’d excommunicate everybody, they’d say they were sorry and request rebaptism, and they’d all sit down to fried chicken. It felt good to clear the air.
McConkie is long dead now – and, to be fair to him, he did issue the equivalent of an “I’m full of crap” statement after Spencer W. Kimball’s 1978 revelation on blacks and the priesthood. At that time, McConkie encouraged Latter-day Saints to forget everything he’d ever said about race and people of African descent, since the Church now had further light and knowledge on the subject.
The trouble is, some didn’t forget. Now, with his book finally off the shelves and lacking the Church’s seeming imprimatur, perhaps they will.
But, Jana. That's Mormon leadership in a nutshell: Offensive...and...flat-out wrong in their interpretation of the Bible." What's new under the Mormon sun?
From the article: Yet I still worry that the book lives on like that stubborn, garrulous old great-uncle you try to avoid at family reunions. It’s given enduring legitimacy to McConkie’s racism, sexism, and strange interpretations of the Gospel.
Ya think? But that's typical Mormon output from its "apostles" -- "strange interpretations of the Gospel!" And McConkie, among MANY other Lds leaders, was indeed racist! Hey, Mormon "scripture" to this very day is racist...both in the Book of Abraham AND Book of Mormon.
This Mormon, Jana Riess, tries to downplay McConkie as like a "stubborn, garrulous old great-uncle you try to avoid at family reunions" and "just a member of the Council of Seventy."
What she doesn't mention is how McConkie, after he published his version in the 1950s and it was later revised in 1966 and beyond, was elevated to the grand Mormon status of "apostle."
She also doesn't mention that the book continued to be republished into the late 1970s under the umbrella of a church-owned publisher! (Meaning the Lds church was officially sanctioning it in more ways than one -- including quoting it significantly in its curricula!)
Also, the Lds church sanctioned the revision of the book as Harold B. Lee -- another Lds "prophet" Riess conveniently ignored -- said it was "OK" to publish as both Marion G. Romney and Spencer W. Kimball...a then-First Counselor to be elevated to Lds "prophet"...oversaw the revision and gave the "OK."
And you think discontinuing the printing of a book that some Mormon church leader wrote more than 60 years ago is a crisis?
Wasnt Jana Riess the mormon woman who wrote that other article about the “Twilight” series being full of Mormon themes???
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2732231/posts
Looks like Jana is on her way to breaking free from the falsehood and slavery of Mormonism
Link is not working for me.
Also, the Lds church sanctioned the revision of the book as Harold B. Lee — another Lds “prophet” Riess conveniently ignored — said it was “OK” to publish as both Marion G. Romney and Spencer W. Kimball...a then-First Counselor to be elevated to Lds “prophet”...oversaw the revision and gave the “OK.”
____________________________________________
Well after 1978 Harold B Lee was probably ignored
It didnt look good for the mormon PR to acknowledge anyone in trhe Mormon Corp who had been bigoted towards blacks recently...especially a morm on president and “prophet”
From Wikipedia on Harold Bingham Lee, 11th president of the LDS
It was Lee who blocked the LDS Church from rescinding the Negro doctrine in 1969, a move favored by Hugh B. Brown. In 1969, after McKay’s health failed, and some others within the church leadership thought the doctrinal basis for the exclusion of people of African ancestry from the priesthood was shaky, the remaining First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles (minus Harold B. Lee, who was traveling) voted to rescind the racial exclusion policy; however, that vote was reversed when Lee returned and called for a re-vote, arguing that the policy could not be changed without a revelation. (Quinn, Michael D. The Mormon Hierarchy: Extensions of Power Salt Lake City: 1994 Signature Books Page 14)
When McKay died in 1970 Joseph Fielding Smith became church president and Lee was called as First Counselor in the First Presidency. He continued to gain practical experience for what was expected to be a long presidency of his own, he being decades younger than Smith.
However, Lee’s presidency proved one of the briefest in the history of the church, lasting from Smith’s death in July 1972 to Lee’s sudden fatal heart attack in December 1973.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
God don’t like racists
Related threads
Landmark 'Mormon Doctrine' goes out of print
Mormon Doctrine (1958–2010), RIP.
Mormon Doctrine enjoyed a long, controversial history
Mormon Bookstore Unshelves Twilight Series, Despite Meyer's Sex=Bad Message
“I know you, and I know you’re actually going to read that book,” she told me. “So I wanted to tell you that just because it is called Mormon Doctrine, and it was written by a general authority, doesn’t mean that everything in it is really what the Church teaches now. If you have any questions about anything, anything at all, just come and ask me.” This was confusing. This hyper-orthodox Molly Mormon friend was telling me, in her gentle Utah woman’s voice, that a Church general authority was not quite trustworthy as a source of information about the Church. Interesting.
With a heavy, if not solitary, dependency on the word "now".
Is this article satire???
The whole premise for an LDS church is absurd..espcially in light of the Truth (aka the revealed Word in the OT, and NT)!
J.S.
Excellent post, PY.
good point. if she is a Mormon, with Mormon friends and relatives, then i think she is a courageous woman, to speak out, and i wish her well...
(and yes, certainly i would pray she is led to a Christian church that doesn’t teach other christian churches are damned to Hell. ...especially with the rapid expansion of Islam, we need to remember Jesus rebuking his disciples, and tolerating those who preached in his name. most of all, i pray for Christian unity. as it talks about in Acts and Corintians and Ephesians...)
Not sure what happened. Here it is: One Year Later, Bruce R. McConkie’s “Mormon Doctrine”: Buh. Bye.
Doesn't read that way.
Here you have Mormon grassroots telling other Mormon grassroots that what their sacred "apostles" say is untrustworthy.
Quite interesting!
Ty!
Thanks for the correction. I am so with you. Let's get our pitchforks!!
Command us, Oh Colofornian!!
This Mormon scourge has spread even further than I feared.
What should we do?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.