Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Neanderthals Have Sex with Modern Humans?
Fox News ^ | November 06, 2009 | Charles Q. Choi

Posted on 11/13/2009 5:05:13 PM PST by HarleyD

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: OldPossum
I am not convinced that those Neanderthal genes are extinct at all. Over the years as I went to work, from time to time I would observe some men—oddly enough, it was never women—on the subway who had a distinct resemblance to the drawings of cavemen that I have seen. Sometimes I would see one who complemented the facial looks with mass amounts of dark hair emanating from his shirt cuffs.

Interesting observation. One might wander among the hills of Tennessee or Afghanistan and see folks that, shall we say, differ more in appearance than the average? Am I agreeing with the Neanderthal theory? Not quite. But there are many unknowns.

41 posted on 11/13/2009 8:18:18 PM PST by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Re: Bawney Fwanks - could be that’s why the species died out? No reproduction, no continuation of the species.


42 posted on 11/13/2009 8:18:38 PM PST by boatbums (Pro-woman, pro-child, pro-life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD

Very interesting. God, that Bible....


43 posted on 11/13/2009 9:59:53 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

From a brief article from Answers In Genesis:

“Since the Bible describes all human beings as sinners, and we are all related (“And He has made from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth,” Acts 17:26), the gospel makes sense only on the basis that all humans alive and all that have ever lived (except for the first woman6 ) are descendants of the first man Adam. If this were not so, then the gospel could not be explained or defended.

Thus, there was only one man at the beginning—made from the dust of the earth (Genesis 2:7).

This also means that Cain’s wife was a descendant of Adam. She couldn’t have come from another race of people and must be accounted for from Adam’s descendants.”

for the full article, reasonably succinct - here is a link:

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/who-was-cains-wife

They make the very solid theological point that only sons of Adam can be saved. There is only a plan of salvation for those who fell, who were Adam’s posterity.


44 posted on 11/13/2009 10:21:50 PM PST by Marie2 (The second mouse gets the cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Marie2; Just mythoughts
“Since the Bible describes all human beings as sinners, and we are all related (“And He has made from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth,” Acts 17:26), the gospel makes sense only on the basis that all humans alive and all that have ever lived (except for the first woman6 ) are descendants of the first man Adam. If this were not so, then the gospel could not be explained or defended. Thus, there was only one man at the beginning—made from the dust of the earth (Genesis 2:7).

I would, of course, agree with you. There is only ONE descendant from Adam. The point being, at least according to this article, is that homo sapiens were completely different, and processed information differently (perhaps divinely), than the neanderthals. It could be safely argued that those descendants, the descendants of Adam, made it through the Great Flood. The rest would have perished. And there wouldn't be a conflict with the text as the scriptures may be abscribing "the race of men" to homo sapiens.

45 posted on 11/14/2009 12:26:35 AM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
It happens all the time "Down the Shore"...

Hot Chicks With Douchebags


46 posted on 11/14/2009 2:54:23 AM PST by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr
Interesting observation. One might wander among the hills of Tennessee or Afghanistan and see folks that, shall we say, differ more in appearance than the average? Am I agreeing with the Neanderthal theory? ... many unknowns.

Add back country New England, and it sounds Lovecraftian.

47 posted on 11/14/2009 8:26:26 AM PST by Lee N. Field (I am not a navi, nor do I ramble on pretending to be one on teh Interwebz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Stultis

48 posted on 11/14/2009 8:36:35 AM PST by Gamecock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Marie2

The word ‘blood’ was added in Acts 17:26. And there are two different days of flesh beings created/formed in Genesis 1 and 2.


49 posted on 11/14/2009 1:10:30 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

Of course they had sex together. The question is whether they had children as a result.


50 posted on 11/14/2009 1:14:14 PM PST by DavidAccord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Ewwwwww.....gross....


51 posted on 11/14/2009 1:32:32 PM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
I would, of course, agree with you. There is only ONE descendant from Adam. The point being, at least according to this article, is that homo sapiens were completely different, and processed information differently (perhaps divinely), than the neanderthals. It could be safely argued that those descendants, the descendants of Adam, made it through the Great Flood. The rest would have perished. And there wouldn't be a conflict with the text as the scriptures may be abscribing "the race of men" to homo sapiens.

John 1:1 In the beginning (that means Genesis) was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

So if the Heavenly Father is given to us by His Word from the beginning, the beginning is what sets the foundation.

Now we have scientific evidence there is more than one blood type. So how did all the different blood types get their beginning? And in this modern era DNA can tell the sex and the race of the individual. IF we are all one blood when did this reactions of blood types and distinguishing features recognized by DNA begin.

Genesis 6:2 is the second place in the Word where Neanderthals having sex with modern humans is recorded.

BUT Christ Himself told Nicodemus that the 'first' requirement to see the kingdom of God was to be born from above. So these that were reproduced of the flesh modern humans and so called Neanderthals, that came through this flesh age would have met that first requirement.

The book of Jude tells us about those of Genesis 6:2 that refused to be born into flesh and pass through this flesh age and they are marked and numbered for that same death that the devil was judged.

Now the Adam and Eve sinned the first sin of flesh in this flesh age. Why I say that, because before the Adam was ever formed we are told that in the midst of the Garden of Eden was the symbolic 'tree of the knowledge of good and evil'. Yet at the end of Genesis 1 The heavenly Father said his creation was good.

Isaiah 14 and Ezekiel 28 both describe that 'age' when the devil was created and when he rebelled and there he was as a symbolic tree knowing 'good and evil.

52 posted on 11/14/2009 2:30:19 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Lee N. Field
Interesting observation. One might wander among the hills of Tennessee or Afghanistan and see folks that, shall we say, differ more in appearance than the average? Am I agreeing with the Neanderthal theory? ... many unknowns.

Add back country New England, and it sounds Lovecraftian.

Please don't start mentioning Cthulhu, the Deep Ones, the Elder Race, the Mi-Go, the Old Ones, the Outer Ones, or the planets of Yuggoth or Yaddith, or utter the cry Tekeli-li whilst traveling on the fabled Plateau of Leng, else the UFOlogists here will be crawling all over this thread like ants at a picnic.

53 posted on 11/14/2009 2:33:15 PM PST by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Are you saying that the human race has been sort of infiltrated by some other mammal? I.e. we all have some sort of neandrethal blood in us?

If so I’d like to bring up the fact that separate species can’t reproduce successfully. Also, the sex with an animal is a crime of great proportions in scripture. Also, that mankind is the only creature made in God’s image.


54 posted on 11/14/2009 10:51:29 PM PST by Marie2 (The second mouse gets the cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson