Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brigham Young Univ Newspaper Recalled Over "Apostle/Apostate" Mix-up
Editor & Publisher ^ | April 7, 2009 | E&P Staff

Posted on 04/07/2009 7:23:28 AM PDT by Alex Murphy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: greyfoxx39

Should read, “With that mind-set, it’s not unbelievable that the Apostate/Apostle ERROR was made.


21 posted on 04/07/2009 8:32:43 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Classy fashion icon Michelle O......always dressed to the 8s.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
Apostates

Actually, when you consider how many folks, how many church bodies, and how many church sects that LDS label as "apostates," (see ** below) 'tis obvious they've just got "'apostates' on the brain!"

"I'm an apostate, you're an apostate...wouldn't you like to be an apostate, too? Drink Dr. Koolaid."

** "Christendom" -- as defined by LDS apostle Bruce R. McConkie: “The term applies to the whole body of supposed Christian believers; as now constituted, this body is properly termed APOSTATE Christendom” (Mormon Doctrine, p. 131).

McConkie added: “A perverted Christianity holds sway among the so-called Christians of apostate Christendom.” (p. 132) (So, now we're not only "apostates," but "perverted" and "so-called Christians.")

22 posted on 04/07/2009 8:50:06 AM PDT by Colofornian ("As the fLDS are, the LDS once were. As the fLDS are, the LDS will become.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
The paper claims it was typo caused by spell check.

That's a LIE!
The words are SPELLED correctly!

Perhaps Apostle was incorrectly spelled and the correction suggested by the spell checker was Apostate.

I have had that type of thing happen to me.

23 posted on 04/07/2009 8:52:24 AM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; All
Who wants to go on E-bay to nab one of these that a BYU student is bound to be selling soon? (Perhaps the Flying Inmans could pool their resources to acquire one...after all...the Inmans admire truth-telling -- wherever it's source may be)

(I hope it doesn't become a case like the Hofmann forgeries, though...where the highest church officials were trying to get first nab @ some of these things to bury them in the infamous underground church vault)

24 posted on 04/07/2009 8:54:00 AM PDT by Colofornian ("As the fLDS are, the LDS once were. As the fLDS are, the LDS will become.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
From the article: Brad Rawlins, chair of the Department of Communications said, “We are reprinting the paper and we will have the corrected version back on the racks by mid-afternoon This shows the deep concern we have on the matter. We don’t think this error is glib or cute or humorous. We understand people will take offense to the error. We ourselves are offended as a department for this error.

No wonder some FREEPER posters are constantly being told by LDS FREEPERS how "offensive" their posts are...seems they're so "offense-happy" that BYU's Communications Department Chair says they even offend themselves!

And here wasn't it the LDS apologists, FAIR, who came up with a Daniel C. Peterson piece called, "Offenders for a Word?" -- trying to make some big case that just because LDS use a distinctive word, it offends Christians?

Well, all these BYU students were doing was to do the same thing Mormons have done for 179 years -- you take a good Christian word and then redefine it 180 degrees! That's been Mormon tradition from the get-go!!! Retrieving all these publication copies & reprinting them? Isn't BYU showing now who's being the "Offenders for a Word?"

25 posted on 04/07/2009 9:06:21 AM PDT by Colofornian ("As the fLDS are, the LDS once were. As the fLDS are, the LDS will become.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
From the article: “Clearly this is an unacceptable mistake, and we’ll be spending a great deal of time with our students over the next several weeks to carefully examine our review processes,” Department of Communications administrators said in a formal statement.

Translation: "Our hierarchy is not hierarchical enough."

26 posted on 04/07/2009 9:09:02 AM PDT by Colofornian ("As the fLDS are, the LDS once were. As the fLDS are, the LDS will become.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Since Jos. Smith was the first mormon apostate, it’s only logical that all who follow in his footsteps are also apostates.


27 posted on 04/07/2009 9:20:43 AM PDT by topcat54 (Don't believe in a pre-anything rapture? Join "Naysayers for Jesus")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Ouch, freudian slip?

That is just classic.


28 posted on 04/07/2009 9:48:33 AM PDT by reaganaut (ex-mormon, now Christian. "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; All
Quorum of the Twelve

Well, we know this Phrase isn't biblical -- so it can't be a "restoration" of the original. (So we know LDS have abandoned original titles -- and have created their own)

(And even if LDS try to say, "Hey, Jesus had 12 disciples/apostles" -- then they know neither the Bible nor even the Book of Mormon.)

Jesus actually had at least 14 apostles. Judas killed himself, leaving 11. Matthias replaced him as the 12th (13th accumulative apostle). Then Jesus, post-resurrection, personally chose Saul/Paul. So, even if you discount Judas, it's still 13.

What's more, if LDS say they believe the Book of Mormon is history...then their account goes that the resurrected Jesus went to South or Central America to establish yet another testimony/church of Jesus. Well, if this is history, how many apostles did the American Jesus establish? (A second set of 12). That makes for 24-25 apostles -- all contemporary to each other.

So if the LDS Church is a true "restoration" of the original church, why don't they have a "Quorum of 24" or a "Quorum of 25"???...Could it be because they don't really believe that the Book of Mormon was historical?

29 posted on 04/07/2009 9:57:36 AM PDT by Colofornian ("As the fLDS are, the LDS once were. As the fLDS are, the LDS will become.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
Divine Intervention Add in Pack for Desktop Publisher Spell Check Version 2.0
30 posted on 04/07/2009 10:45:41 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (Stupidity has an expiration date 1-20-2013 *(Thanks Nana))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

Well, there’s no yellow journalism in that paper..

LOL


31 posted on 04/07/2009 11:03:05 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

This explains why nobody knows why Joey Smith claimed he had found that Presbyterianism is untrue...

He meant to say something positive and affirming as he was informing his Mom that he wanted to become a Presbyterian minister, but he sneezed “achoo” and the spell check picked it up as “untrue”...

Mystery solved...

:)


32 posted on 04/07/2009 11:12:55 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
This explains why nobody knows why Joey Smith claimed he had found that Presbyterianism is untrue...

He meant to say something positive and affirming as he was informing his Mom that he wanted to become a Presbyterian minister, but he sneezed “achoo” and the spell check picked it up as “untrue”...

Mystery solved...

Given the BOM etc., Joey must have had a severe case of hay fever...

33 posted on 04/07/2009 11:21:01 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (Stupidity has an expiration date 1-20-2013 *(Thanks Nana))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
Divine Intervention Add in Pack for Desktop Publisher Spell Check Version 2.0

LOL

34 posted on 04/07/2009 11:28:48 AM PDT by Colofornian ("As the fLDS are, the LDS once were. As the fLDS are, the LDS will become.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
I have had that type of thing happen to me.

INdeed: I have to.

I retract my calling it a LIE!

35 posted on 04/07/2009 11:34:31 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Devine
Electronic
Vocabulary
Idea
Locator

Details.....


36 posted on 04/07/2009 11:39:02 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Here is a lithograph of an early experiential model.

It was stone(d), powered I believe...


37 posted on 04/07/2009 11:44:15 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (Stupidity has an expiration date 1-20-2013 *(Thanks Nana))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicked_Bible

The Wicked Bible, sometimes called The Adulterous Bible or The Sinners' Bible is a term referring to the Bible published in 1631 by Robert Barker and Martin Lucas, the royal printers in London, which was meant to be a reprint of the King James Bible. The name is derived from the compositors' mistake: in the Ten Commandments (Exodus 20:14) the word not in the sentence Thou shalt not commit adultery was omitted. This blunder was spread in a number of copies....

38 posted on 04/07/2009 1:52:05 PM PDT by Rameumptom (Gen X= they killed 1 in 4 of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rameumptom; Alex Murphy

Look! Over there......

lol


39 posted on 04/07/2009 2:03:23 PM PDT by colorcountry (A faith without truth is not true faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian
***Could it be because they don't really believe that the Book of Mormon was historical?***

You misspelled hysterical.

40 posted on 04/07/2009 2:17:11 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (14. Guns only have two enemies: rust and politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson